Helen Grant
MP for Maidstone and Malling
Con
6 May 2010 - Present
Questions Asked by This MP
Parliamentary questions and government responses.
Prime Minister's Questions
No PMQs questions found for this MP.
Given the Justice Minister's conflicting remarks in the Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee, and given the Solicitor General's responsibility for upholding the rule of law, will she confirm whether a decision that a defendant on trial will face a judge, sitting alone, will be subject to judicial review?
Context
The MP is questioning the Justice Minister's conflicting remarks in the Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee.
Ellie Reeves
I will take away the hon. Lady's comments, discuss them with Justice Ministers and confirm the position to her in writing.
Session: Jury Trials
View All Questions -->
Sir Brian Leveson recommended removing the right to elect a jury trial in cases involving offences that carry a maximum sentence of up to two years. Cases would be heard by a judge, sitting alongside two magistrates, in a Crown court bench division. The Government's proposals go much further. They seek to remove the right to jury trial for offences carrying a maximum sentence of up to three years. Cases would be heard by a judge sitting alone. Why have the Government departed from Sir Brian's recommendations in two important respects, both of which make serious inroads into the right to be heard by a jury?
Context
The MP is questioning the Government's proposals in contrast to Sir Brian Leveson's recommendations.
Ellie Reeves
As I set out, we inherited a courts system in crisis, with victims waiting years for their cases to get to court. We have all heard the stories of rape victims waiting three or four years for their cases to get to court. That is unacceptable, and it is why inaction is not an option, and why we have invested over £2.5 billion in our courts system. Jury trials will remain a cornerstone of our justice system. It is right, however—given the backlog that we face, and given that Sir Brian said that investment alone will not shift the dial—that we look at the jury system, which has not been looked at since the 1970s, to see what more we can do to make sure that cases get to court quicker and are heard, giving justice to both victims and defendants.
Session: Jury Trials
View All Questions -->
I thank the right hon. and learned Lady for what she said about the Hudgell case and the child cruelty register. It is unfortunate that the right hon. and learned Lady just will not answer the very straightforward questions that I am asking. Jo Hamilton OBE was a victim of the Post Office Horizon scandal. Will the Solicitor General explain how removing this vital safeguard makes the justice system more fair, not less?
Context
There is concern that none of the wrongly convicted sub-postmasters in the Post Office Horizon scandal would have had the right to a jury trial under proposed measures.
Ellie Reeves
The hon. Lady will be well aware that we are not removing jury trials; they will remain a cornerstone of this justice system. Some cases involving sentences expected to be three years or less will be triable either way, which will be heard by a judge.
Session: Courts and Tribunals Bill
View All Questions -->
On Second Reading of the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Minister for Courts and Legal Services told the House that 'politics is about choices', so let us be clear about the choices this Government have made. They chose to bring forward a Bill with no consultation, no manifesto mandate, no Green Paper, no White Paper, and no robust modelling. What does the Minister think about these choices?
Context
The Courts and Tribunals Bill faces criticism for its lack of consultation, manifesto mandate, robust modelling, and expedited Committee scrutiny.
Ellie Reeves
May I first pay tribute to the hon. Lady's tireless campaigning on behalf of her constituents, Paula and Tony Hudgell? I am pleased that the Government have now announced a child cruelty register. In relation to the points made by the hon. Lady, Sir Brian Leveson—an incredibly well regarded and experienced lawyer—took months on his two reports, which set out a huge number of recommendations.
Session: Courts and Tribunals Bill
View All Questions -->
Which is it? Is it about the backlog, in which case what alternatives to scrapping jury trials are actually being considered, or is this just an unworkable attack on our civil liberties wrapped up in ideology?
Context
The Minister for Courts and Legal Services says she would scrap jury trials even if there was not a crisis in the courts. The Lord Chancellor wants to look at alternatives to reduce the backlog.
The Solicitor General
I would remind the hon. Lady that 90% of cases in this country are already heard without a jury, but I do not think it can be denied that 14 years of Conservative Government left a crisis in our courts. It cannot be right that victims of rape are waiting three or sometimes four years for their cases to get to court. As I have said before, reform on its own is not enough. That is why we have a record number of sitting days, and it is why we are putting £550 million into support for victims and have increased solicitor fees. We have to look across the system at how we can do better, because justice delayed is justice denied.
Session: Jury Trials
View All Questions -->
The Government cannot champion legal certainty on the one hand and flirt with retrospective decision making on the other. There is another contradiction too, this time on retrospectivity. The Courts Minister says that cases already committed for trial at Crown court could be pushed back to swift courts. The Lord Chancellor suggests that the changes would only apply to new cases. That is not a minor discrepancy; it is about people’s lives. Which version are we meant to believe: the Lord Chancellor’s or the Minister’s?
Context
There is a contradiction between the Minister for Courts and Legal Services who says she would scrap jury trials even if there was not a crisis in courts, and the Lord Chancellor who wants to look at alternatives to reduce the backlog.
The Solicitor General
Any changes will need to go through legislation in this House in the normal way, and I am sure that the Conservatives will want to scrutinise any proposals we put forward. I am happy to take away those questions to the Ministry of Justice and ensure that the hon. Lady receives an answer.
Session: Jury Trials
View All Questions -->
This month, the hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull East wrote: 'The erosion of jury trials not only risks undermining a fundamental right, but importantly, will not reduce the backlog by anything like enough'. He went on to say he would vote against it if brought to the House and that both the House and the public will not stand for the erosion of this right. Is the Solicitor General concerned about these proposals?
Context
The MP refers to a statement by Karl Turner expressing concerns about the erosion of jury trials and the Justice Secretary's proposals. The MP also mentions that at least 38 colleagues share similar views.
Solicitor General
I take very seriously the proposals put forward by Sir Brian Leveson, which made it clear that because of the crisis in the justice system and a backlog of 80,000 cases left by the previous Conservative Government, investment alone is not enough; radical reform is required. Jury trials are not being got rid of but some cases will be heard by magistrates or the Crown bench division. Justice delayed is justice denied. People wait far too long for their case to get to court and 60% of rape victims pull out before it gets there.
Session: Jury Trials
View All Questions -->
The campaign to introduce a child cruelty register has been led tirelessly by Paula Hudgell, the adoptive mother of 11-year-old Tony Hudgell. Sadly, Paula has now been diagnosed with terminal cancer. Tony was just 41 days old when his birth parents abused him so badly that he had to have both his legs amputated. Tony will live with the consequences of those injuries for the rest of his life. Will the Solicitor General agree to work, and at speed, with her colleagues in the Ministry of Justice? They seem keen to support Paula’s campaign, hopefully with an amendment to the Sentencing Bill in the House of Lords.
Context
Paula Hudgell, adoptive mother of Tony Hudgell, is leading a campaign for a child cruelty register and has been diagnosed with terminal cancer. Tony was severely abused at 41 days old, losing both legs.
The Solicitor General
I thank the hon. Member for raising the tragic case of Tony Hudgell. I know that his parents, along with the right hon. Member for Tonbridge (Tom Tugendhat), who is no longer in his place, have campaigned tirelessly for Tony and his family. I am very sorry to hear about Paula’s diagnosis, and I am sure that the thoughts of the House are with her and the family. I will take this matter away and do everything I can, along with Home Office and Justice Ministers, and we will respond in full to the points raised by the hon. Lady.
Session: Violence against Women and Girls
View All Questions -->
One of the most sickening aspects of violence against women and girls is cruelty to and abuse of children. There is currently no national mechanism to track down and monitor serious child cruelty offenders after service of their sentences. The Under-Secretary of State for Justice, the hon. Member for Rother Valley (Jake Richards), said this of the Sentencing Bill on Report: ‘A problem in the system has been identified, and we are determined to fix it. It simply cannot be right that some horrific child abusers can have access to children—to live with children or work with children—at the end of their sentences without any system of monitoring or notification’. The Minister went on to welcome the offer of cross-party talks and promised to work ‘at speed’ to establish a child cruelty register. Can the Solicitor General please update the House on what concrete steps have been taken since then?
Context
A lack of a national mechanism to track serious child cruelty offenders after their sentences. The Under-Secretary of State for Justice promised cross-party talks to establish a child cruelty register.
The Solicitor General
I thank the hon. Member for raising the extremely important issue of child abuse. I will work with the Minister to respond to her in full on the points that she raises today.
Session: Violence against Women and Girls
View All Questions -->
According to press reports, Qari Abdul Rauf, a convicted ringleader of the Rochdale child rape gang, is still living in the town. That is nearly 10 years after a judge ordered his deportation. Repeated appeals under article 8 of the ECHR—the right to family life—have blocked his removal. What action are the Government taking to stop criminals abusing article 8 to defeat Parliament’s clear intention to deport them?
Context
Qari Abdul Rauf, a convicted ringleader of the Rochdale child rape gang, is still living in the town nearly 10 years after a judge ordered his deportation.
The Solicitor General
If you come to this country, you play by our rules. That is why since we came into office, we have been taking action to ensure that foreign offenders can be deported at the earliest opportunity. In the period since we have been in office, we have deported nearly 30,000 foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers. That is the highest rate of returns for more than half a decade. It is the right thing to do, it will save prison capacity, and it will save taxpayers’ money.
Session: Immigration Government Legal Advice
View All Questions -->
Why is Britain missing from the list of signatories supporting a reset of the European convention on human rights for national Parliaments to remove foreign offenders who threaten public safety? Can the Solicitor General confirm whether the Government will now back that initiative?
Context
Nine European allies have written to Strasbourg, requesting a reset of the ECHR for national Parliaments to remove foreign offenders. Britain has not joined.
The Solicitor General
As the Lord Chancellor made very clear yesterday, the UK remains committed to the ECHR, but it is absolutely right that as the challenges facing modern democracies evolve, so must international law and indeed domestic interpretation of that law. This Government are taking a serious, considered and responsible approach, and we have a history of engaging constructively with the Court.
Session: Immigration Government Legal Advice
View All Questions -->
The Attorney General has admitted to recusing himself from certain matters; he has also maintained absolute silence about which matters those may be. In these circumstances, we must ask ourselves: is that the level of transparency that our democracy demands? What safeguards exist when the Attorney General’s past clients and present duties overlap? Who, independent of the Attorney General himself, scrutinises those critical decisions on recusal, or do we face the concerning spectacle of the Government’s chief legal adviser marking his own homework?
Context
Concerns about transparency regarding the Attorney General’s recusal from certain matters.
The Solicitor General
As I have outlined, the Attorney General’s Office has rigorous and long-standing processes in place. Upon appointment, the AGO compiles a list of matters in which the Law Officer has previously been involved, by searching cases, cross-referencing with information obtained by the Law Officer’s chambers or firm and working through the list with the Law Officer themselves. The Office works with the Government Legal Department, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office to obtain additional information and compile the final list of conflicts and actions associated with each case. As the shadow Solicitor General knows, the Attorney General cannot publish a list of his former clients due to client confidentiality.
Session: Attorney General's Office Transparency and Conflicts of Interest
View All Questions -->
I fully support the Government's mission to halve violence against women and girls within the next decade, but how will the Government's progress be measured to ensure that they deliver against their target? What assessment has been made of the definition of violence against women and girls?
Context
The MP supports the Government's mission to halve violence against women and girls within a decade but asks how progress will be measured to ensure delivery of this target.
Lucy Rigby
Timeliness is clearly key, and the hon. Lady is absolutely right to refer to our commitment to halving violence against women and girls within a decade. We will take urgent action, building on the urgent action we have already taken. In November, for example, pilots of the new domestic abuse protection orders began with three police forces, enabling them to provide additional protection to victims.
Session: Violence against Women and Girls
View All Questions -->
Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. I wish you and the team a very happy Christmas indeed. I congratulate the Solicitor General on her position and welcome her to her place. I hope to work constructively and effectively with her on this challenging and very important part of Government. As the Solicitor General knows, rape victims need action now, urgently, given that many rape cases take more than two years to come to trial. There has been much talk from Ministers about opening specialist fast-track rape courts, but disappointingly there has been very little detail to date. How will the Government achieve that fast-tracking if they do not use all potential court sitting days, as requested by the Lady Chief Justice but refused by the Lord Chancellor?
Context
The MP acknowledges the Solicitor General's position and expresses concern about the length of time many rape cases take to come to trial. She asks how fast-tracking will be achieved if all potential court sitting days are not used.
Lucy Rigby
I am grateful to the shadow Solicitor General for her kind words. She brings an awful lot of experience and expertise to her role, and I look forward to working constructively with her. She raises the issue of violence against women and girls, and refers to Crown court sitting days. I said earlier that I am very pleased that an additional 2,000 Crown court sitting days were added by the Lord Chancellor yesterday.
Session: Violence against Women and Girls
View All Questions -->
Violence against women and children is abhorrent and inexcusable. It crushes self-confidence and self-esteem in victims, wrecks families and ruins lives. As someone who was a family lawyer for 23 years before coming to this place, I welcome the Government's mission to halve violence against women and girls within the next decade. To achieve that important goal, what action are the Government taking on prevention and early intervention, and when will the specialist rape courts be introduced?
Context
The question acknowledges the importance of reducing violence against women and girls, asking for specifics on early intervention and prevention measures.
Sarah Sackman
I welcome the shadow Solicitor General to her place. She brings enormous experience, not only in legal matters but specifically in relation to violence against women and girls, and I look forward to working constructively with her in this area. In answer to the hon. Lady's question, she is right that the commitment to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade is a cross-Government initiative. Prevention and early intervention are a core part of that; that is why when the VAWG mission board met earlier, there was a real focus on education—how we educate about consent and early intervention, so that we can prevent these cases from entering the criminal justice process.
Session: Violence Against Women and Girls
View All Questions -->
Other Parliamentary Activity
Debates led and petitions presented.
Blue Badge Eligibility
16 July 2025
Responding: Lilian Greenwood
Main Concerns
['Cancer patients and those with life-altering conditions are being denied blue badge eligibility despite significant side effects of treatment such as extreme fatigue, pain, and mobility restrictions. The current three-year rule and the lengthy application process of 12 to 15 weeks are out of step with cancer timelines.']
Specific Asks
['The lead MP asks for a reconsideration of the position on blue badge eligibility criteria to include cancer patients and those with life-altering conditions, either by broadening the current system or introducing a separate but similar scheme.']
South East Water: Disruption of Supply
03 June 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Water Supplies East Grinstead 2026-01-12
12 January 2026
Urgent Question
Contributed to this debate
Will the Minister confirm the support for people affected by the ongoing interruption to water supplies in East Grinstead and the surrounding villages, with more than 16,000 households impacted due to...
Sentencing Bill 2025-10-29
29 October 2025
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. The new clauses would require the Secretary of State to assess the effectiveness and use by courts of parenting orders and financial orders for yo...
Attorney General’s Office Conflicts of Interest 2025-01-23
23 January 2025
Urgent Question
Led by this MP
Will the Solicitor General make a statement on the management of conflicts of interest in the Attorney General’s Office, particularly regarding the Attorney General's previous representation of Gerry ...
Football Governance White Paper
23 February 2023
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
David Fuller Case
08 November 2021
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
UN International Day of Education
28 January 2021
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
I thank the Backbench Business Committee for scheduling this important debate so close to the United Nations International Day of Education. The debate highlights the importance of education, especial...
Football (Regulation)
26 January 2021
General Debate
Led by this MP
The governance of English football is broken, with financial disparities between rich clubs and poor ones leading to unsustainable business models. The Football Association's outdated structure and la...
BROADCASTING
18 October 2016
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Welcomes the debate and the hon. Member for West Bromwich East to his place. Stresses that the BBC is widely recognised as one of the world's best broadcasters, and highlights the importance of the co...
BACKBENCH BUSINESS
07 July 2016
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The internet needs to be a force for good, not ill. With more than three quarters of constituents using the internet daily and half of all crimes having digital components, there is an urgent need for...
Attendance
67.3%
66 of 98 votes
Aye Votes
37
37.8% of votes
No Votes
29
29.6% of votes
Abstentions
32
32.7% of votes
11 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Closure motion
Ayes: 293
Noes: 218
Passed
11 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Second Reading
Ayes: 270
Noes: 286
Failed
10 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Social Housing Bill [Lords]: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading
Ayes: 77
Noes: 292
Failed
09 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Ame...
Ayes: 371
Noes: 100
Passed
08 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 140
Ayes: 79
Noes: 300
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 142
Ayes: 108
Noes: 357
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 143
Ayes: 106
Noes: 302
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: Amendment 1
Ayes: 162
Noes: 297
Failed
07 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 6
Ayes: 77
Noes: 317
Failed
07 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 145
Ayes: 170
Noes: 316
Failed
04 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Motion to sit in private
Ayes: 1
Noes: 79
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 65
Ayes: 166
Noes: 346
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 67
Ayes: 105
Noes: 410
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 88
Ayes: 85
Noes: 427
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Representation of the People Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 411
Noes: 102
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and...
Ayes: 322
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) (Amendment...
Ayes: 318
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 80
Noes: 281
Failed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED AYE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4
Ayes: 173
Noes: 282
Failed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED AYE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
Ayes: 177
Noes: 308
Failed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Customs (Tariff and Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2026
Ayes: 323
Noes: 160
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Carbon Budget Order 2026
Ayes: 332
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (International Aviation and International Shipp...
Ayes: 329
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026
Ayes: 330
Noes: 93
Passed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness
Ayes: 108
Noes: 307
Failed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amen...
Ayes: 294
Noes: 110
Passed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition Day: Puberty blockers
Ayes: 112
Noes: 283
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
Ayes: 164
Noes: 311
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
Ayes: 104
Noes: 391
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
Ayes: 74
Noes: 323
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11
Ayes: 171
Noes: 322
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
National Security (State Threats) Bill: Allocation of Time motion
Ayes: 233
Noes: 94
Passed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
Ayes: 85
Noes: 317
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 8
Ayes: 143
Noes: 249
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
Ayes: 135
Noes: 258
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 144
Noes: 244
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 77
Noes: 255
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 151
Noes: 258
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 162
Noes: 246
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulatio...
Ayes: 262
Noes: 86
Passed
24 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: Protections for children from online harms
Ayes: 69
Noes: 279
Failed
23 Feb 2026
VOTED AYE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
Ayes: 161
Noes: 272
Failed
23 Feb 2026
VOTED AYE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 156
Noes: 273
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 77
Noes: 280
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 73
Noes: 256
Failed
23 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 361
Noes: 84
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Marit...
Ayes: 362
Noes: 107
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Local Government Finance Report (England) 2026-27
Ayes: 277
Noes: 143
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Principles) (England) Report 2...
Ayes: 279
Noes: 90
Passed
04 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026
Ayes: 392
Noes: 116
Passed
0
PMQs Asked
15
Ministerial Questions Asked
14
House of Commons Debates Involved
1
Westminster Hall Debates Led
0
Statements / Bills
0
Petitions Presented
98
Voting Record
Activity Compared to Peers
How does this MP's parliamentary activity compare to the national average across 1457 MPs?
Prime Minister's Questions
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
3.7
Ministerial Questions
+12% above average
This MP:
15
Average:
13.4
Westminster Hall Debates Led
-60% below average
This MP:
1
Average:
2.5
Commons Chamber Debates
+187% above average
This MP:
14
Average:
4.9
Statements / Bills Proposed
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
9.5
Petitions Presented
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Voting Attendance Rate (%)
-3% below average
This MP:
67.3
Average:
69.2
Important Context
- - Ministers answer questions rather than asking them, so have different activity patterns
- - Activity quantity doesn't measure quality or effectiveness of representation
- - Some MPs focus more on constituency work than parliamentary questions
- - Newly elected MPs will have less parliamentary history
About This Page
This page tracks Helen Grant's parliamentary activity including questions asked, debates (Commons Chamber + Westminster Hall), statements/bills, and petitions presented.