Alex Burghart
MP for Brentwood and Ongar
Con
8 Jun 2017 - Present
Questions Asked by This MP
Parliamentary questions and government responses.
Response classifications show how directly each question was answered.
Why does the government punish people who do not vote Labour, including parents sending children to private schools and pensioners unable to pay for fuel this winter?
Context
The question follows criticisms that the government is punishing those who did not vote Labour.
Angela Rayner
The Government has been fixing the mess left by the Conservatives, taking difficult decisions to fix a £22 billion black hole. The faces may change but it is the same old Tory party: straight back to putting everything on the credit card.
Assessment
Specifically asked about punishment towards non-Labour voters and was met with criticism of the Conservative party's actions.
Changed Subject
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Why do the Government think that above-inflation pay rises for trade unions are worth so much more than reducing inheritance tax for farmers?
Context
Opposition highlighted the impact of inheritance tax on family farms.
Angela Rayner
I think it is an audacity for the hon. Gentleman to stand at the Dispatch Box and suggest in some way that Labour broke promises or raised taxes. I will school the hon. Gentleman: it was his Government who raised taxes to their highest level for a generation.
Assessment
Did not explain prioritization of union pay over farmer concerns; instead criticised previous government's performance.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Will the right hon. Lady commit to no further increases to inheritance tax or reductions in agricultural property relief?
Context
A typical mid-size family farm faces a new liability of half a million pounds due to inheritance tax.
Angela Rayner
The hon. Gentleman talks about the facts, and I absolutely stand by the figures that the Government have set out. The vast majority of estate owners will be totally unaffected.
Assessment
Did not commit to no further increases or reductions as requested; focused on current figures only.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
What would the right hon. Lady like to say to farmers concerned about their livelihoods?
Context
Opposition Members spoke to farmers worried about their way of life due to the current government's policies.
Angela Rayner
First of all, we are absolutely committed to our British farmers, and—[Interruption.] That is why we have committed £5 billion to the farming budget over the next two years. That is the largest ever amount for sustainable food production in the UK.
Assessment
Did not fully address all concerns raised by farmers; focused on funding commitment only.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Does the right hon. Lady agree that this Government's decisions mean higher inflation for working people?
Context
The official Opposition referenced previous inflation rates under Liz Truss.
Angela Rayner
I ask the hon. Gentleman: 11.1% or 3%?
Assessment
Did not provide agreement or disagreement on current government's impact on inflation.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
What are the Government doing to bring down inflation?
Context
The official Opposition highlighted previous inflation rates under Liz Truss.
Angela Rayner
I think it is astonishing that—first, may I welcome the hon. Member to his place? Many people might not know that he was the Minister with responsibility for growth when, under Liz Truss, inflation was at 11.1% and growth flatlined.
Assessment
Did not provide information on current measures to reduce inflation; instead criticised previous government's performance.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
It is perfectly reasonable to rule things out. The Minister has had plenty of time to talk to No. 10 since his interview on Sky. I am sure the Labour party would rule out many things at this stage—I am sure it would rule out leaving the European convention on human rights, getting rid of net-zero targets and bringing back the death penalty—so why is it so hard for the Minister and the Government to rule out rejoining the EU?
Context
The Minister refused to rule out rejoining the EU in the next Labour manifesto, despite the Prime Minister stating it would be wrong to rerun divisive arguments about rejoining the EU.
Hamish Falconer
I want to be really clear with the House, as the Prime Minister has been repeatedly: despite the anxious desire of Opposition Members, we are not rerunning the arguments of 2016 once again. My constituents, and the constituents of Members right across the House, are concerned with the day-to-day impacts of the deal we have inherited; it is my job to improve it, and that is what I am focused on. Our manifesto red lines remain in place, and I will of course update the House on the proceeds of the negotiation. We have been clear in the King's Speech that, should that negotiation result in the need for legislation in this House, it will of course face scrutiny here.
Session: EU-UK Relationship 2026-09-10
View All Questions -->
The questioner reiterates his previous question and asks again about the income tax receipts that Ben Houchen will retain. He wants to know why mayors cannot provide rebates like councils.
Context
The Prime Minister announced that mayors will keep a proportion of income tax receipts but did not clarify if they can use this to cut taxes or offer rebates.
Louise Haigh
The mayor does not have the ability to provide rebates now and is unlikely to in the future, as it would involve data from HMRC and setting income tax thresholds.
Session: Topical Questions 2026-09-10
View All Questions -->
I welcome the Minister to his post. I very much look forward to him updating the House on his negotiating mandate and his conversations with the European trade commissioner. Earlier this summer, the Prime Minister said that it would be wrong to rerun divisive arguments about rejoining the EU, but, soon after, the Minister refused to rule out rejoin being an option in the next Labour manifesto. Will he tell the House: will Labour rule out rejoin featuring in its next manifesto?
Context
The Prime Minister said it would be wrong to rerun divisive arguments about rejoining the EU, but the Minister refused to rule out rejoin being an option in the next Labour manifesto.
Hamish Falconer
I can hear that there is outrage behind me. I have many responsibilities, but writing the next Labour party manifesto is not one of them. We are committed to the red lines. We were all elected on that manifesto. We want to go further and faster—we have inherited a poor deal with the European Union, and it is my job to improve it.
Session: EU-UK Relationship 2026-09-10
View All Questions -->
The questioner asks why Conservative Mayor Ben Houchen will not be allowed to use the income tax receipts to cut taxes or offer rebates. The questioner believes that mayors should have the same power as councils to offer rebates.
Context
The Prime Minister announced that mayors will keep a proportion of income tax receipts but did not clarify if they can use this to cut taxes or offer rebates.
Louise Haigh
The mayor does not have the ability to provide rebates now and is unlikely to in the future, as it would involve data from HMRC and setting income tax thresholds.
Session: Topical Questions 2026-09-10
View All Questions -->
Will the Secretary of State support a Lib Dem amendment to ensure parliamentary scrutiny on decisions to block disclosure based on national security grounds?
Context
The right hon. Member for Makerfield warned of the lack of proper scrutiny in national security decisions.
Hilary Benn
The Government are committed to maximum possible disclosure consistent with the requirement that falls on Ministers, but debate on amendments including Lib Dem proposals will occur during the Committee stage of the Bill.
Session: Troubles Legacy Legislation 2026-07-08
View All Questions -->
Given the former Armed Forces Minister's resignation, does the Secretary of State now accept that the Bill should not progress and revert to previous legislation?
Context
There is lack of cross-party support for the bill.
Hilary Benn
The 2023 Act's immunity provisions were opposed by all Northern Ireland political parties, victims' organizations, and Labour. The Government will proceed with reforms as these have broad-based opposition.
Session: Troubles Legacy Legislation 2026-07-08
View All Questions -->
I am very glad to be the one to break the news that the right hon. Gentleman wants to keep his current job and not move to another role. This is a serious question. Does the right hon. Gentleman think it would be appropriate for the new Prime Minister to answer questions before the summer break? If so, will he make representations to the next Prime Minister?
Context
The MP inquires about the new PM's plans to answer questions before the summer break.
Darren Jones
I understand the premise of the hon. Gentleman's question, and I am sure the new Prime Minister will agree with the sentiment. We are waiting for confirmation of the timetable for the Labour party's election of a new leader. The sitting dates of this House have already been confirmed, but I know the new Prime Minister will want to come to the Dispatch Box at the earliest opportunity.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Obviously the House does not want to do anything prejudicial to a case, but it appears that the Metropolitan police are saying that some documents could be released without being prejudicial. If there is a criminal trial or even if there isn't one, more information will likely be released. As this has been a particularly novel way of using and responding to a Humble Address, it is likely there will be a Select Committee inquiry into how the process ran. Will the right hon. Gentleman give a commitment now at the Dispatch Box that there is no material that the Government have withheld that the Metropolitan police have not explicitly asked to be withheld?
Context
The House agreed that more information will be released if it does not prejudice the case, yet there is a discrepancy between what the Government says and what the Metropolitan Police request.
Darren Jones
All documentation the Government hold has been published except for what was requested by the Metropolitan Police. The only remaining documentation that will be released is held by the Metropolitan police themselves.
Session: Lord Mandelson Humble Address Government Response
View All Questions -->
The Government have always maintained that they withheld material from the Mandelson case only at the request of the Metropolitan police, but two weeks ago, a Daily Mail journalist spoke to the Met who insist that they did not ask for certain messages to be withheld. Can the Chief Secretary explain why the Metropolitan Police and the Government are saying different things?
Context
There are discrepancies between the Government's claim of withholding material at the police request and a Daily Mail report suggesting otherwise.
Darren Jones
I have been advised not to detail or itemise those requests but instead refer to the categories of documentation requested. The Government do not want to jeopardize the Metropolitan Police's criminal investigation by releasing certain documents, as it could make their work harder.
Session: Lord Mandelson Humble Address Government Response
View All Questions -->
This may be the last time I come up against the right hon. Gentleman during parliamentary questions. When we first faced each other nine months ago, I said that he was one of the most able performers in Government, and I still believe that to be the case. I think there will come a time when his party regrets the fact that he did not stand in this leadership contest. I think he would have lost—
Context
The MP predicts this may be the last time he interacts with the right hon. Gentleman due to upcoming leadership changes.
Darren Jones
I thank the hon. Gentleman for his kind comments. He says that this might be our last time together at the Dispatch Box; I do not know where he is planning on going, but I hope to be back here in due course. He asks a very pertinent question. I know that any Prime Minister takes their responsibilities to the House seriously, and I am sure that the next Prime Minister will be at the Dispatch Box at the earliest opportunity.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
You have not answered my question. This is a crucial piece of the puzzle in understanding how the IRA obtained weapons used against people in our country. You are within your rights to ask Ireland to conduct a full public inquiry on behalf of victims. Will you do so?
Context
The previous answer did not address the specific request to write to the Taoiseach for an urgent public inquiry into the Enfield explosives factory.
Hilary Benn
Since this matter was raised directly, I undertake to raise it with Irish authorities because they will have seen our exchange.
Session: Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
View All Questions -->
The Belfast Telegraph reported that prior to 1985, a large amount of gelignite used by the IRA came from a single factory in County Meath, Ireland. Nothing was done despite British intelligence raising concerns. Will you commit to writing to the Taoiseach asking for an urgent public inquiry into this Enfield explosives factory?
Context
Reports in the Belfast Telegraph suggest that a large part of gelignite used in IRA bombs was routinely stolen from an Enfield explosives factory prior to 1985. The supply amounted to many tonnes, and British intelligence repeatedly raised concerns with Dublin.
Hilary Benn
I have seen the reports. The Bill facilitates cooperation with Irish authorities regarding these matters. We will provide information for those affected through full co-operation between the Irish authorities and the legacy commission.
Session: Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
View All Questions -->
Cat Little, the permanent secretary, has just told the Foreign Affairs Committee that a very, very small number of people have actually seen the document in question. Will the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister commit to the House that when he has identified who leaked it, he will report them to the Metropolitan police?
Darren Jones
I can confirm that we take this matter deeply seriously and, as I say, we reserve the right to do so once the facts have been established through the inquiry.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
The Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister is perfectly intelligent enough to know that there is an enormous difference between those two words. I will remind him that the Prime Minister is bound by the ministerial code.
Yesterday, the Prime Minister also told the House:
“Sir Olly was absolutely clear that nobody put pressure on him to make this appointment”—[Official Report, 22 April 2026; Vol. 784, c. 316.]
but that is not what Sir Olly said to the Foreign Affairs Committee. He actually said:
“Throughout January, honestly, my office and the Foreign Secretary’s office were under constant pressure.”
Again, he said that
“while I think the Department felt under pressure, we were proud of the fact that we had not bowed to that pressure.”
Again, he said that Philip Barton’s handover to him
“contributed to my strong sense that there was an atmosphere of pressure”.
To avoid being in breach of the ministerial code, Ministers must correct the record at the earliest available opportunity. At the very latest, the earliest opportunity is now. Will the Prime Minister correct the record?
Yesterday, the Prime Minister also told the House:
“Sir Olly was absolutely clear that nobody put pressure on him to make this appointment”—[Official Report, 22 April 2026; Vol. 784, c. 316.]
but that is not what Sir Olly said to the Foreign Affairs Committee. He actually said:
“Throughout January, honestly, my office and the Foreign Secretary’s office were under constant pressure.”
Again, he said that
“while I think the Department felt under pressure, we were proud of the fact that we had not bowed to that pressure.”
Again, he said that Philip Barton’s handover to him
“contributed to my strong sense that there was an atmosphere of pressure”.
To avoid being in breach of the ministerial code, Ministers must correct the record at the earliest available opportunity. At the very latest, the earliest opportunity is now. Will the Prime Minister correct the record?
Darren Jones
It is not the view of the Prime Minister or the Government that the Prime Minister needs to do so.
Session: Ministerial Code
View All Questions -->
Last week, someone in the heart of Government leaked some extremely sensitive documents to The Guardian. This appears potentially to be a crime under the National Security Act 2023. Has the Cabinet Office reported it to the Metropolitan police?
Darren Jones
As I confirmed to the House, I think, a day or so ago, a leak inquiry has begun. When further facts are established, we reserve the right to do so.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Paragraph 1.6.c of the ministerial code states:
“It is of paramount importance that ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity.”
Yesterday, the Prime Minister said to the House that Sir Olly Robbins
“went on to say: ‘I…have complete confidence that… recommendations to me and the discussion we had and the decision we made were rigorously independent of’ any ‘pressure.’”—[Official Report, 22 April 2026; Vol. 784, c. 316.]
What Sir Olly actually said to the Foreign Affairs Committee was:
“I also have complete confidence that their recommendations to me and the discussion we had and the decision we made were rigorously independent of that pressure.”
Sir Olly said “that” pressure, not “any” pressure. The Prime Minister materially changed Sir Olly’s meaning. Robbins was clear that he had been put under pressure. Does the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister know whether the Prime Minister intends to correct the record?
“It is of paramount importance that ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity.”
Yesterday, the Prime Minister said to the House that Sir Olly Robbins
“went on to say: ‘I…have complete confidence that… recommendations to me and the discussion we had and the decision we made were rigorously independent of’ any ‘pressure.’”—[Official Report, 22 April 2026; Vol. 784, c. 316.]
What Sir Olly actually said to the Foreign Affairs Committee was:
“I also have complete confidence that their recommendations to me and the discussion we had and the decision we made were rigorously independent of that pressure.”
Sir Olly said “that” pressure, not “any” pressure. The Prime Minister materially changed Sir Olly’s meaning. Robbins was clear that he had been put under pressure. Does the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister know whether the Prime Minister intends to correct the record?
Darren Jones
I think the difference between the words “that” and “any” is not of material relevance to the question that the shadow Minister is putting to the House. The Prime Minister has not misled the House. The testimony of the Prime Minister and of Sir Olly Robbins is very clearly on the record, and that makes the case.
Session: Ministerial Code
View All Questions -->
Does this case not exemplify why the Government's solution is wrong? It reopens the door to vexatious litigation and pays for these challenges against our troops with taxpayers' money. Will they use this opportunity to think again and take a new approach that guarantees genuine protections?
Context
A case has arisen where veterans face vexatious litigation, with legal aid funding the challenges against them. The courts themselves have stated that some cases are ludicrous.
Hilary Benn
There will be genuine protections, but legal aid in Northern Ireland is a matter for the Executive. The previous Government did not consider removing judicial review entirely. The argument that it should not apply in certain cases would face significant opposition.
Session: Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy and Reconciliation
View All Questions -->
In 1991, the SAS shot and killed three members of the IRA's East Tyrone Brigade. A judicial review was brought against these findings but it was thrown out by the High Court in Belfast. Why is this case continuing?
Context
The questioner is concerned about the continuation of judicial reviews that continue for years after incidents, citing a specific case.
Hilary Benn
Any citizen has a right to bring a judicial review against any decision made. The original judge threw out the case as having no merit, and given the inquest found the use of force lawful, it is not surprising that this was thrown out.
Session: Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy and Reconciliation
View All Questions -->
Will the Minister publish the details of that meeting and ensure that the new Cabinet Secretary looks into what happened at that meeting and everything between that meeting and the direct award?
Context
A meeting between the Prime Minister and Palantir in February last year, with Palantir receiving a direct award for £240 million from the Government.
Darren Jones
The Humble Address deals with the matters in question, but the meeting referred to is about the extension of a contract awarded under the previous Government. It is incorrect to suggest it was a new contract related to the meeting.
Session: Standards in Government
View All Questions -->
Well, it is not very clear, because FIRS is three years old. This morning, I spoke to my right hon. Friend the Member for Tonbridge (Tom Tugendhat), who established FIRS. When he was establishing it, MI5 told him that it was essential for understanding the operation of the Chinese state in the UK. The enhanced tier would impose mandatory registration and transparency requirements on individuals and organisations in the UK working with Chinese entities. I think most people in this House would now agree that that is entirely necessary. It is there to help our security services protect our country. Please will the Security Minister give us a date by which he will come back to this House to tell us definitively whether he will put China on the enhanced tier, and to set out his explanation?
Context
The MP questioned the clarity of the Government's response to the new China spy case regarding the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS).
Dan Jarvis
On a simple point of fact, FIRS is not three years old. When we came into government, FIRS was not a properly developed system. [Interruption.] Opposition Members may groan, but it is a statement of truth that FIRS was not ready to go. This Government got a grip and introduced that tool. It came into force, in effect, on 1 October last year. We have already placed two countries on the enhanced tier. We take these decisions very carefully, but I give the hon. Gentleman a commitment that I will come back, when there is a requirement to do so, and update the House on any further decisions that we seek to make on FIRS.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Given the apparent conflict of interests, will the Minister agree to publish full details of that meeting in February last year and explain why it was not disclosed at the time?
Context
A meeting between the Prime Minister and Peter Mandelson and Palantir in February last year, with Palantir later receiving a direct award for £240 million from the Government.
Darren Jones
Since the Government have done some research, they have found that the original contract was awarded under the previous Administration and renewed subsequently. The Government will disclose information under the Humble Address.
Session: Standards in Government
View All Questions -->
Yesterday, in the light of the new China spy case, I asked the Security Minister to place China on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme. He told us that FIRS is “a relatively new tool”, and that the Government “are seeking to ensure that we can derive the maximum operational capability from it.”—[Official Report, 4 March 2026; Vol. 781, c. 817.] That is wonderful Whitehall language, but will he please tell us what it means?
Context
The MP questioned the clarity of the Government's response to the new China spy case regarding the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS).
Dan Jarvis
The arguments about FIRS are well rehearsed, but I am old enough to remember when Conservative Members said that we would not introduce FIRS. Then they said that we would introduce it later than we had said we would. We introduced FIRS on time, but it is still a relatively new capability. I think that it offers considerable potential, in terms of what it will deliver for our country, but we are looking very closely at how we can ensure its maximum operational capability. I think that is pretty clear in any language.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Will he also commit to return to this House before Easter to update Members on the work that his Department has done and what it has found?
Context
Investigation into Peter Mandelson's time as a Government Minister.
Matthew Patrick
I believe that work will be published by the Cabinet Office. I will ensure that, through that, the House will receive an update on the records.
Session: Public Services
View All Questions -->
Can the Minister assure the House that his Department will comb its records to identify any possible wrongdoing?
Context
Revelations about the procurement of services and goods during Peter Mandelson's time as a Government Minister.
Matthew Patrick
I can absolutely give the shadow Secretary of State that assurance. That work is under way and we will update the House on anything that may emerge.
Session: Public Services
View All Questions -->
At the risk of overworking the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, I would like to ask him a question. It is boring but important; my last boring question was to the Paymaster General. The Opposition have found that his Department often refuses to release information to Members in response to parliamentary questions, but then releases it in response to freedom of information requests. Does he agree that, in principle, that is wrong?
Context
There is a concern that the Department often refuses to release information in response to parliamentary questions but then releases it in response to freedom of information requests.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Darren Jones)
I do, and I am happy to take a look at that.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Happy new year, Mr Speaker. Over Christmas, seven former senior SAS officers wrote in The Telegraph: ‘In this Troubles Bill, the Government is complicit in this war on our Armed Forces.’ A few days later, the Northern Ireland Veterans Commissioner, appointed by this Government, said that the Bill treats veterans “worse than terrorists” and is eating at the very fabric of the Armed Forces. Can the Secretary of State tell the House which former senior officers support the Bill?
Context
The MP cites statements from former senior SAS officers criticizing the legislation, questioning if any former senior military figures support it.
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Hilary Benn)
I do not agree with either of the characterisations that the hon. Gentleman just referred to. I am confident that the protections, which we have designed specifically for veterans, will change their experience in relation to the legacy process. However, as I have said to the House, we continue to talk to veterans and veterans organisations. I want to produce a Bill that can offer the reassurance they are looking for: that we have a fair and proportionate system that recognises their service to the country.
Session: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
View All Questions -->
Last week, it was announced that the Government’s attempt to join the new EU defence fund had failed. This is a major setback for our relationship with the EU, and it is a major embarrassment for the Government. Since that time, no Minister has come to the House to explain what on earth has gone so horribly wrong, so perhaps the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster can tell us: what has gone so horribly wrong?
Context
The government's attempt to join the EU’s new defence fund has failed, leading to embarrassment for the government. There are no explanations in the House about what went wrong.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Darren Jones)
First, regardless of the negotiation on SAFE, our collaboration with European partners is stronger than ever on defence and defence procurement. In relation to SAFE in particular, about which the hon. Member asked, this was always going to be a negotiation between the EU and the UK, and the UK Government rightly have to consider value for money considerations in return for how much access British industry has to the contracts being negotiated in Europe. Irrespective of the position on SAFE, I can confirm to the House that UK companies will still be able to take part in European procurement for defence equipment, with an up to 35% allowance for British components in those manufactured goods.
Session: EU Relations
View All Questions -->
Well, someone was briefing in the right hon. Gentleman’s name. I thank him for his answer, but on the same theme, the electricity distribution network for London and much of the south-east, as well as the gas distribution network for about 5 million people in our country and the water supply for about another 3 million, are currently under Chinese ownership. That includes the power supply for the Palace of Westminster, Whitehall and many security capabilities. Will the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster tell us whether he has reviewed the national security implications of these legacy acquisitions? If not, will he commit to doing so?
Context
Concerns over national security due to current Chinese ownership of electricity distribution networks, gas distribution network for about 5 million people, and water supply for another 3 million.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Darren Jones)
I can reassure the hon. Member and the House that we constantly keep critical national infrastructure risks under review and will take interventions as required to protect the national interest and national security of the United Kingdom.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
A few weeks ago I wrote to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster about Chinese ownership of critical national infrastructure, including the possible acquisition of Thames Water. I have not had a reply, but since then The Telegraph has been briefed by the Government that the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster would block such an acquisition. Can he confirm to the House that he will use his powers under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 to launch an investigation before any Chinese acquisition of Thames Water is allowed to proceed?
Context
A previous letter to the Chancellor regarding Chinese acquisition of Thames Water and concerns over national security.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Darren Jones)
The House will know that because of the quasi-judicial powers I have under the National Security and Investment Act 2021, I cannot comment on individual transactions. I can assure the hon. Gentleman that we are always willing to use those powers to protect the national interests and national security of this country.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
I thank the Secretary of State for his answer, and I am aware that the Republic is sharing the information with our inquiry, but he will be aware that the Omagh inquiry is only capable of answering questions about what UK state authorities did and did not do. Four years ago, Mr Justice Horner said that there needed to be a parallel inquiry in the south. The victims and families recognise that; does the Secretary of State recognise it?
Context
The Omagh bombing in 1998 was the deadliest attack during the troubles. The UK government has initiated an inquiry into whether state authorities could have prevented it.
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Hilary Benn)
I recognise what the judge said in his judgment four years ago, and I strongly support what the last Government did to establish a public inquiry, but it is for the Irish Government to make that decision. I hope that with the unprecedented co-operation that the Irish Government have undertaken to give the inquiry, they will provide vital information for the inquiry to get to the bottom of what happened.
Session: Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
View All Questions -->
On 15 August 1998 in Omagh, the Real IRA murdered 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins. It was the deadliest attack of the troubles, and the most wicked. Following the 2021 recommendation of Mr Justice Horner, the last Conservative Government launched the Omagh inquiry into whether UK state authorities could have done anything to prevent the bombing. However, the bombers planned and launched their attack from the Republic of Ireland, which is why Mr Justice Horner also said that an independent inquiry was needed in the Republic to ask whether Irish state authorities could have done anything. Given that the UK inquiry was announced three years ago, did the Secretary of State raise the question of an inquiry in the south with his counterparts on his recent trip to Dublin?
Context
The Omagh bombing in 1998 was the deadliest attack during the troubles. The UK government has initiated an inquiry into whether state authorities could have prevented it.
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Hilary Benn)
I have raised that question in my conversations with the Irish Government. It is, of course, for the Irish Government to decide whether they wish to hold a public inquiry but, as the hon. Gentleman will be well aware, the Irish Government have committed to co-operate fully with the inquiry that the last Government established, both through the memorandum of understanding on the provision of information and the commitment they have made to legislate to allow witnesses to give evidence to it.
Session: Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
View All Questions -->
Was he told that the alleged case of spying against Members of Parliament was due to collapse before the information became public and, if so, who told him?
Context
MP inquires about the notification of a Crown Prosecution Service decision regarding an alleged case of spying against MPs.
Darren Jones (Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister)
The only relevant institution in this case is the Crown Prosecution Service. It is the CPS that independently decides whether to bring forward these cases, and it was the independent decision of the Crown Prosecution Service not to proceed.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
In their plan for change, the Government pledged to get the country the highest sustained growth in the G7—or back to where the Conservative Government left it. However, it seems that this Government are on course to fail. All respected international analysis—by the OECD, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and so on—suggests that over the next four years, the UK economy will grow nothing like as fast as the United States or Canada. What analysis can the Minister point to that suggests otherwise?
Context
The Government pledged to achieve the highest sustained G7 growth, but international analysis suggests otherwise.
Ellie Reeves (Minister without Portfolio)
Since coming into government a year ago, we have taken measures to fix the mess left behind by the Conservatives. That is why, in the first quarter of this year, we were the fastest growing economy in the G7; interests rates have gone down four times, meaning people are paying less on their mortgages; and wages are rising faster than prices. That is the difference that a Labour Government make.
Session: Plan for Change
View All Questions -->
Will the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster confirm that civil servants should not engage in public fundraising for political parties and will he assure the House that this breach will be properly investigated?
Context
Senior civil servant Lord Mandelson spoke at a Labour Party fundraising event, raising concerns about the rules for civil servants.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Pat McFadden)
I believe there has been correspondence to the Cabinet Secretary about this. He will reply in due course, but let me add this: Lord Mandelson is doing an excellent job as our ambassador to the United States.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Will the Secretary of State set out why the Government decided to drop that appeal?
Context
The High Court in Northern Ireland ruled that the legislation preventing taxpayer-funded compensation was incompatible with the European convention on human rights. The Conservative Government appealed this judgment, but when Labour came to power last summer, they dropped the appeal.
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Hilary Benn)
The courts found clauses 46 and 47 were unlawful. Although the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal was not obviously asked to rule on that, because we had withdrawn the appeal, it did comment unfavourably on those provisions. We supported clauses 46 and 47 at the time, but they have not worked, and that is why we have to find an alternative way forward.
Session: Interim Custody Orders Compensation
View All Questions -->
Will the Paymaster General give us an update on his negotiations with the European Union? He has not updated the House since the beginning of February, and there has been much speculation in the press. Will he take this opportunity to rule out dropping the right to annual quota negotiations on fishing?
Context
The MP asks for an update on the government's EU fishing negotiations, noting that there has been much speculation in the press since the last update.
Nick Thomas-Symonds (The Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office)
We will negotiate in the interests of our fishers and understand and implement our marine protection rights. As I am sure the hon. Gentleman will understand, I will not give a running commentary on the negotiations, but we are clear that we will negotiate in the national interest and in line with the manifesto that the Government, with 411 Members of Parliament, were elected on.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
We do not yet know what else the US Administration may announce later today apart from tariffs on cars and steel and aluminium. The effects of any tariffs, if imposed, will be felt equally across the UK. Has the Government provided businesses in Northern Ireland with information to help them prepare for different scenarios?
Context
The House expects the US to announce major changes to its tariff regime, which may cause disruption in the UK. Alex Burghart highlights that Northern Ireland could be particularly affected due to unique arrangements.
Hilary Benn
We will have to see what tariffs are announced and then take appropriate action. If the EU retaliates, there will be an issue for Northern Ireland. However, businesses can get tariff reimbursement if they demonstrate that goods bought from the US do not leave the UK.
Session: UK Industrial Strategy
View All Questions -->
We appear, regrettably, to be witnessing the start of a global trade war. Over the past week, the United States has placed tariffs on some of its major trading partners, and they have retaliated in kind. The President has said that he intends to place tariffs of 25% on EU goods soon. Should that happen, it is highly likely that the EU will respond. Even if the United Kingdom were to avoid tariffs, the consequences for Northern Ireland could be particularly complex. What conversations has the Paymaster General had with his European counterparts to ensure that Northern Ireland is not caught in the crossfire of a trade war?
Context
The MP is concerned about the potential consequences of a trade war between the US and EU, especially for Northern Ireland.
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office)
To reassure the hon. Gentleman, the Windsor framework taskforce is based in the Cabinet Office and I regularly discuss issues on Northern Ireland with my European counterparts. I can assure him that I will speak to Maroš Šefčovič on a number of occasions prior to 19 May.
Session: Relations with the EU
View All Questions -->
Police numbers in Northern Ireland are at their lowest ever. Two weeks ago, Policy Exchange estimated that the cost to the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) of the repeal of the legacy Act might well stretch to hundreds of millions of pounds. If that is the case, will the Government step in to support the PSNI, or are they content to see a reduction in frontline policing and national security?
Context
Policy Exchange estimated the cost to the PSNI of the repeal of the legacy Act might stretch to hundreds of millions of pounds, potentially reducing frontline policing.
Hilary Benn
The Government have provided additional funding to the PSNI through the autumn statement via the additional security fund. The Policy Exchange report contains speculation about numbers but it is clear that legislation supported by the previous Government was flawed and found to be unlawful, necessitating a fix.
Session: Public Services
View All Questions -->
Yesterday in Davos, Mr Šefčovič suggested that the UK and the EU were talking about dynamic alignment. As the Paymaster General will be aware, that is, if true, a very significant step. Will he be clear with the House: is dynamic alignment on the table?
Context
The MP asks about dynamic alignment mentioned by Mr Šefčovič.
Nick Thomas-Symonds (The Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office)
I have to give the hon. Gentleman top marks for audacity. I do not know whether Conservative MPs have heard, but a week ago, the Leader of the Opposition gave her new year speech, and, as I am sure they know, we listened to it extremely carefully.
Session: Relations with the EU
View All Questions -->
Other Parliamentary Activity
Debates led and petitions presented.
Rewiring the State
02 September 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The Prime Minister has set out priorities to address 40 years of overly centralised decision making and over-privatisation, which have stripped power and resources away from communities. The Governmen...
Northern Ireland Office
29 June 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The debate addresses the lack of an agreed budget for Northern Ireland, with Departments forced to rely on emergency contingency powers. The Finance Minister's draft multi-year budget remains unresolv...
Lebanon: Israel Defence Forces Operations
03 June 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Asked the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs to make a statement on the Israel Defence Forces’ operations in Lebanon. Emphasised that the IDF is expanding its i...
Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response
01 June 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges
28 April 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The motion calls for the matter of Peter Mandelson's appointment as US Ambassador to be referred to the Privileges Committee due to claims that the Prime Minister misled the House. Kemi Badenoch argue...
Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update
27 April 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Dunmurry Police Station Attack
27 April 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - Motion to carry over the bill to next Session
27 April 2026
Bill Debate
Contributed to this debate
The amendment seeks to ensure that proceedings on the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill continue into the next parliamentary session. The Bill is essential to address the legacy of the troubles, which ha...
Points of Order
27 April 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Point of Order
22 April 2026
General Debate
Led by this MP
Sought a correction to the record from today’s Prime Minister’s questions, stating that Sir Olly Robbins was under pressure regarding the appointment of Philip Barton, contrary to what the Prime Minis...
Attendance
72.4%
71 of 98 votes
Aye Votes
38
38.8% of votes
No Votes
33
33.7% of votes
Abstentions
27
27.6% of votes
11 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Closure motion
Ayes: 293
Noes: 218
Passed
11 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Second Reading
Ayes: 270
Noes: 286
Failed
10 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Social Housing Bill [Lords]: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading
Ayes: 77
Noes: 292
Failed
09 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Ame...
Ayes: 371
Noes: 100
Passed
08 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 140
Ayes: 79
Noes: 300
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 142
Ayes: 108
Noes: 357
Failed
08 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 143
Ayes: 106
Noes: 302
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: Amendment 1
Ayes: 162
Noes: 297
Failed
07 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 6
Ayes: 77
Noes: 317
Failed
07 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 145
Ayes: 170
Noes: 316
Failed
04 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Motion to sit in private
Ayes: 1
Noes: 79
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 65
Ayes: 166
Noes: 346
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 67
Ayes: 105
Noes: 410
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 88
Ayes: 85
Noes: 427
Failed
02 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Representation of the People Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 411
Noes: 102
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and...
Ayes: 322
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) (Amendment...
Ayes: 318
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 80
Noes: 281
Failed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED AYE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4
Ayes: 173
Noes: 282
Failed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED AYE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
Ayes: 177
Noes: 308
Failed
24 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Customs (Tariff and Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2026
Ayes: 323
Noes: 160
Passed
24 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Carbon Budget Order 2026
Ayes: 332
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (International Aviation and International Shipp...
Ayes: 329
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026
Ayes: 330
Noes: 93
Passed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness
Ayes: 108
Noes: 307
Failed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amen...
Ayes: 294
Noes: 110
Passed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition Day: Puberty blockers
Ayes: 112
Noes: 283
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
Ayes: 164
Noes: 311
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
Ayes: 104
Noes: 391
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
Ayes: 74
Noes: 323
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11
Ayes: 171
Noes: 322
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
National Security (State Threats) Bill: Allocation of Time motion
Ayes: 233
Noes: 94
Passed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
Ayes: 85
Noes: 317
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 8
Ayes: 143
Noes: 249
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
Ayes: 135
Noes: 258
Failed
17 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 144
Noes: 244
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 77
Noes: 255
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 151
Noes: 258
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 162
Noes: 246
Failed
16 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulatio...
Ayes: 262
Noes: 86
Passed
24 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: Protections for children from online harms
Ayes: 69
Noes: 279
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
Ayes: 161
Noes: 272
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 156
Noes: 273
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 77
Noes: 280
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 73
Noes: 256
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 361
Noes: 84
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Marit...
Ayes: 362
Noes: 107
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Local Government Finance Report (England) 2026-27
Ayes: 277
Noes: 143
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Principles) (England) Report 2...
Ayes: 279
Noes: 90
Passed
04 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026
Ayes: 392
Noes: 116
Passed
6
PMQs Asked
51
Ministerial Questions Asked
59
House of Commons Debates Involved
0
Westminster Hall Debates Led
20
Statements / Bills
0
Petitions Presented
98
Voting Record
Activity Compared to Peers
How does this MP's parliamentary activity compare to the national average across 1370 MPs?
Prime Minister's Questions
+64% above average
This MP:
6
Average:
3.7
Ministerial Questions
+280% above average
This MP:
51
Average:
13.4
Westminster Hall Debates Led
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Commons Chamber Debates
+1114% above average
This MP:
59
Average:
4.9
Statements / Bills Proposed
+111% above average
This MP:
20
Average:
9.5
Petitions Presented
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Voting Attendance Rate (%)
+5% above average
This MP:
72.4
Average:
69.2
Important Context
- - Ministers answer questions rather than asking them, so have different activity patterns
- - Activity quantity doesn't measure quality or effectiveness of representation
- - Some MPs focus more on constituency work than parliamentary questions
- - Newly elected MPs will have less parliamentary history
About This Page
This page tracks Alex Burghart's parliamentary activity including questions asked, debates (Commons Chamber + Westminster Hall), statements/bills, and petitions presented.