← Back to House of Commons Debates
Transition to State Pension Age
16 July 2026
Lead MP
Debbie Abrahams
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
EmploymentBenefits & WelfareWomen & EqualitiesParliamentary Procedure
Other Contributors: 2
At a Glance
Debbie Abrahams raised concerns about transition to state pension age in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
EmploymentBenefits & WelfareWomen & EqualitiesParliamentary Procedure
Government Statement
Ms Debbie Abrahams presented the Work and Pensions Select Committee report on the transition to state pension age, highlighting its importance given recent increases from 65 to 66 in 2020 and further rises starting this April with a peak at 67 by 2028. The report noted uneven effects of these changes, particularly affecting individuals in poor health or with limited resources. Over the past two decades, spending on state pensions and benefits has risen from 5.3% to 6% of GDP, projected to reach 9% by 2070, with over half of DWP spending allocated towards these areas. The committee emphasises the need for fairness not just between generations but within them, considering regional disparities in health and financial stability. For instance, healthy life expectancy has decreased since 2012, falling to 60.7 years for men and 60.9 years for women on average, with industrial regions experiencing even lower figures. Employment rates for those aged 65 dropped to 42% in 2025, decreasing further at 66. The committee advocates better support for older workers through healthier workplaces and flexible employment options, endorsing the Mayfield review but stressing its potential delays. They recommend consulting on an uplift in Universal Credit for those nearing state pension age to prevent hardship, estimating a cost of £600 million annually versus estimated savings of £10.5 billion from raising the pension age to 67. The report also criticises outdated impact assessments and urges comprehensive reviews considering health, employment history, income levels, and protected characteristics.
Question
Did you examine in your report measures the Government could take to keep older people employed? As you rightly noted, this issue affects individuals as they get older.
Minister reply
The Mayfield review provided valuable recommendations which we strongly endorse. Additionally, I would direct my hon. Friend towards other reports that echo similar suggestions. It is crucial to consider the broader context of older workers beyond those with health conditions or disabilities.
Shadow Comment
Gordon McKee
Shadow Comment
Mr Gordon McKee acknowledged the Select Committee Chair's statement and inquired about measures within the report aimed at keeping older people employed. He emphasised that maintaining employment for elderly individuals is a significant challenge as they age.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.