← Back to House of Commons Debates
Regulation of the Marmalade Market
15 April 2026
Lead MP
Tessa Munt
Debate Type
Adjournment Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Tessa Munt raised concerns about regulation of the marmalade market in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Tessa Munt raised concerns about the regulation of marmalade, highlighting that preservers and food retailers are selling products that do not comply with regulations on total sugar and fruit content. She cited the Jam and Similar Products Regulations from 2003, which specify a 60% sugar requirement for marmalade. However, recent changes remove the need to display total sugar content as a percentage on labels. Munt emphasised that these rules are not arbitrary but grounded in scientific research conducted at Bristol University's Long Ashton research station and argued that departing from these standards could result in inferior products.
Order was called to remind MPs to avoid using informal language.
Government Response
Government Response
Angela Eagle responded by reassuring Members that there will be no changes to the composition of marmalade. She clarified that under current EU rules, marmalade can still be labelled as orange marmalade without any requirement for change. The minister emphasised that the Government's aim is to support and protect traditional British food products like marmalade through meaningful regulation. She noted that the SPS deal with the EU will help align regulations and make it easier for consumers to understand what they are buying, while ensuring there are no changes in sugar requirements.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.