← Back to House of Commons Debates
Personal Protective Equipment (Inclusive Standards)
24 March 2026
Lead MP
Kirsteen Sullivan
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
Employment
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Kirsteen Sullivan raised concerns about personal protective equipment (inclusive standards) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Proposes a Bill to require public sector procurement of personal protective equipment (PPE) to comply with Standard BS 30417:2025 or an equivalent standard, arguing that current PPE is often inadequate and unsafe for many employees due to size inconsistencies. Emphasises the need for fit-to-form PPE to ensure safety across various industries including healthcare, firefighting, and construction.
Bathgate
Highlights that current PPE is inadequate for many employees due to poor fit, particularly affecting women and those with disabilities. Mentions the development of BS 30417 by the British Standards Institution, which considers fit-to-form at every stage of procurement, supply, and use. Argues that enshrining this standard in public procurement will send a clear message to employers and manufacturers about inclusive PPE.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.