← Back to House of Commons Debates
BRITISH VICTIMS OF TERRORISM (ASSET-FREEZING AND COMPENSATION)
02 November 2016
Lead MP
Andrew Rosindell
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Andrew Rosindell raised concerns about british victims of terrorism (asset-freezing and compensation) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Proposes a Bill to provide the UK Government with direct power to freeze or seize assets of any state or organisation that sponsors or perpetrates acts of terrorism, enabling compensation for British victims. Emphasises cases like IRA terrorism sponsored by Colonel Gaddafi's regime and recent threats from new generations of terrorists. Advocates for justice for all victims, highlighting personal examples such as the assassination of Ian Gow and the Canary Wharf bombing.
Andrew Rosindell
Con
Romford
Calls for action to address the long-standing issue of compensation for British victims of terrorism, particularly those affected by IRA-Gaddafi regime. Highlights discrepancies in compensation received by American and British victims, and urges the UK Government to utilise frozen assets as leverage for negotiations with future Libyan governments. Seeks a legal framework ensuring that any future victims of terrorism receive justice.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.