← Back to House of Commons Debates
BBC
15 September 2016
Lead MP
Karen Bradley
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyForeign AffairsCulture, Media & SportStandards & Ethics
Other Contributors: 28
At a Glance
Karen Bradley raised concerns about bbc in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Today I am laying before Parliament a draft of the royal charter for the continuance of the BBC, together with the accompanying draft framework agreement between the Government and the BBC. This draft sets out the policies contained in the White Paper published in May, which was informed by public consultations involving over 190,000 people. The new charter aims to strengthen the independence and distinctiveness of the BBC, reform its governance and regulation, enhance transparency, ensure financial stability through a fixed licence fee for the next 11 years, mandate closer cooperation with other broadcasters, and improve representation for all nations in the UK. It also includes provisions for Ofcom to regulate the BBC's operations starting April 3rd next year.
Kelvin Hopkins
Lab
Luton North
Expressed concerns about the draft charter, questioning whether it sustains a degree of Government pressure and threatens the independence and funding of the BBC. He pointed out that having Government appointees on the new board could weaken editorial independence. He also asked for assurances regarding the financial security of the BBC given recent changes in TV licence fees for over-75s, and questioned whether future funding cuts might occur. Furthermore, he raised concerns about the impact on programme diversity with a focus on distinctiveness rather than the Reithian principles, and asked for guarantees that the regulation by Ofcom would not undermine editorial independence.
Maldon
Welcomes the draft charter's significant changes, including new governance structures, diversity requirements, and increased competition for schedule space.
Welcomes transparency and openness commitments but raises concerns over appointment processes and talent pay. Questions the parity of Gaelic with Welsh and challenges the Secretary of State on regional broadcasting issues.
Ed Vaizey
Con
Didcot North
Praises the enhancements made by Karen Bradley to the charter, particularly transparency in pay and open competition for BBC chairman. Emphasises the importance of diversity within the charter.
Ben Bradshaw
Lab
Exeter
Welcomes today’s statement, especially on backing down from previous composition of the board proposals. Questions Rona Fairhead's treatment in the transition to the new unitary board.
Damian Collins
Con
Monmouth
Welcomes the decision for an open and fair process for appointing the chairman of the new BBC unitary board, asks about expected timeline for appointments.
Ian Paisley Jnr
DUP
North Antrim
Raises concerns over past bias in reporting and questions the transparency of salary disclosures for amounts above £150,000.
Philip Davies
Con
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Asked if the BBC should be transparent about taking public money, questioning the need for criminal sanctions against non-payment of licence fee.
Karen Bradley
Con
Staffordshire Moorlands
Responded to Philip Davies by mentioning the Perry review and the necessity of a criminal sanction under current systems. Emphasised that BBC should be transparent about its value for money. Discussed editorial independence and the need for decisions regarding commissioning and news programming to remain with the BBC.
Ian Murray
Lab
Edinburgh South
Expressed support for the importance of the BBC, mentioning Ed Balls being turned into Fred Astaire as a remarkable feat. Questioned if the charter renewal undermines flexibility in BBC Scotland’s news programming and highlighted the significance of audience choice over political influence.
David Morris
Con
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Inquired about the lack of provision for a six o’clock news programme specific to Scotland within the statement.
Deidre Brock
SNP
Edinburgh North and Leith
Questioned whether the new charter would provide greater autonomy in editorial and commissioning decisions for Scotland, particularly with regard to local decision-making power.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Welcomed the involvement of the National Audit Office and expressed that this should deliver confidence, transparency, accountability and financial rigour.
Graham Jones
Lab
Blackpool North and Cleveleys
Critiqued the government's approach to the BBC’s funding, noting pressures on sports events, programmes like “The Great British Bake-Off”, and the merger of news channels. Suggested that this undermines the independence of the BBC.
Desmond Swayne
Con
New Forest West
Asked about decisions regarding Caversham Park’s monitoring service before inquiries are held, expressing dissatisfaction with discussions around salaries.
Diana R. Johnson
Lab
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Inquired how the charter would impact regional news programmes and local radio such as BBC Humberside.
Martin Vickers
Con
Brigg and Immingham
Asked about board representation for English regions in light of the Secretary’s statement focusing on Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
Carmarthen East and Dinefwr
Questioned how the charter would ensure accountability to Welsh audiences and if there could be a Wales member permanently sitting on Ofcom’s board now that it has assumed external regulatory duties.
Stewart Jackson
Con
North East Cambridgeshire
Inquired about ensuring the Public Accounts Committee had the appropriate resources and powers to hold the BBC accountable, after previous issues with legal discrepancies between the committee and the BBC.
Jim Cunningham
Lab
Coventry South
Asked about limits on programme commissioning, suggesting that a 100% rate of commissioning could constitute privatisation by the backdoor.
Nigel Huddleston
Con
Droitwich and Evesham
Expressed hope that revealing “talent” salaries would not reveal gender pay gaps.
Alison Thewliss
SNP
Glasgow Central
Asked about BBC Alba’s programming and its contribution to MG Alba, comparing it with S4C's situation. Mentioned the 73% repeat rate for programmes on BBC Alba.
Andrew Bingham
Con
High Peak
Inquired about promoting programme production outside London and its economic benefits to various areas, using examples of productions from his constituency.
Chris Stephens
SNP
Glasgow North West
Asked for confirmation that costs of free television licences for the over-75s would be published by local authority area and questioned if transferring this cost to the BBC would negatively affect programming quality.
Mark Menzies
Con
Fylde
Asked about the impact of the charter review on the BBC’s training, development, and apprenticeship programmes.
Peter Bone
Con
North Luton
Asked the Secretary of State to explain how new measures would address concerns about BBC bias in favour of the European Union.
Karen Bradley
Con
Staffordshire Moorlands
Responded that Ofcom and the National Audit Office will oversee regulatory matters, ensuring issues like BBC bias are addressed. Also confirmed assurance for investment in local radio stations such as BBC Radio Stoke.
Jeremy Lefroy
Con
Staffordshire Moorlands
Asked the Secretary of State to confirm that under the new charter, there will be proper investment in excellent local radio stations like BBC Radio Stoke shared by his and the Minister's constituents.
Government Response
EconomyForeign AffairsCulture, Media & SportStandards & Ethics
Government Response
Responded to various questions regarding transparency, editorial independence, regional programming, commissioning decisions, accountability measures, programme funding, talent salary revelations, and the impact of new costs on BBC operations. Explained that Ofcom is the regulator under new proposals, and the National Audit Office will assess value for money. Also confirmed assurances for local radio station investments.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.