← Back to House of Commons Debates
Charter for Budget Responsibility
24 February 2026
Lead MP
Torsten Bell
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyTaxation
Other Contributors: 5
At a Glance
Torsten Bell raised concerns about charter for budget responsibility in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves to approve the updated charter, which includes doubling the buffer against fiscal rules and introducing a fiscal lock. The motion supports reducing inflation, lowering interest rates, and boosting business confidence through fiscal stability. Recent data shows a £30.4 billion public finance surplus in January, setting records for monthly surpluses. The Government has reset fiscal rules to prioritise investment and is committed to delivering one annual fiscal event, aligning with the International Monetary Fund's recommendations.
Torsten Bell
Lab
Swansea West
Supports the updated charter which includes reforms to reduce inflation, stabilise interest rates and enhance business confidence through a sustainable fiscal strategy. The new framework provides for one annual assessment of fiscal rules and maintains the OBR's independence.
Richard Fuller
Con
North Bedfordshire
Thanked the Minister for their speech and criticised the Government's economic management, citing a lack of stability and credibility. Emphasised the chaos of the last year by referencing statements made by the Chief Secretary to the Treasury regarding growth forecasts and fiscal plans which have not been realised. Raised concerns about the removal of flexibility in the definition of 'balance' in the charter and questioned why the OBR's independent assessment ahead of the spring statement has been removed. Mentioned business confidence falling due to record concerns over the tax burden on businesses, with 80% of people believing the Government is handling the economy poorly.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Expressed concern regarding the difficulties faced by the Northern Ireland Executive in balancing budgets and addressed the lack of progress on Barnett consequentials despite promises made. Welcomed positive news about tax surplus but underscored the need for addressing ongoing challenges.
Charlie Maynard
Lib Dem
Witney
Acknowledged issues with the current economic policymaking process and noted that reducing fiscal events can create artificial cliff edges. Emphasised the importance of proper parliamentary debate on budget proposals, similar to Sweden's model, for fostering market confidence and stabilising public finances. Highlighted that crucial decisions made during Budget processes significantly affect constituents' daily lives and argued for a fuller picture of Government tax and spending plans.
Torsten Bell
Lab
Swansea West
Responded directly to questions regarding the Government’s changes to the fiscal charter. Emphasised that these changes were based on commitments in their manifesto and recommendations from the IMF. Highlighted the importance of transparency and maintained forecasts twice a year despite fewer fiscal events. Criticised the Opposition spokesperson for ignoring positive economic indicators such as monthly surplus, wage growth, business investment, GDP growth, inflation falling, and interest rates decreasing.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.