Argues for full transparency in negotiations to facilitate parliamentary scrutiny. Outlines the Government's approach towards a free trade agreement and stresses the importance of upholding Northern Ireland’s interests without imposing additional customs infrastructure.

Calls for greater accountability and transparency in the negotiations, urging the Government to commit to making a statement on Monday after this week's crucial round of talks before the Joint Committee. Also highlights the need for meaningful consultation with the devolved Administrations, noting that engagement has been cursory and not reflective of previous promises.

Intervenes to defend the Government's engagement with the Welsh First Minister, questioning whether seeking an extension of the transition period is official Labour party policy. His intervention suggests ongoing tensions between the UK government and devolved administrations regarding the Brexit process.

Intervenes to express concern about the lack of meaningful input from the Scottish Parliament in the Brexit negotiations, questioning whether engagement has been merely informational rather than participatory in decision-making processes.

Asked Bill Cash about his views on a dispute resolution mechanism in any future agreement between the UK and EU. Inquired if independent arbitration could play a role, given that member states have historically benefitted from state aid to the disadvantage of the UK.

Supports the Government in getting a deal done by end of year, but warns that the Northern Ireland protocol undermines UK sovereignty and allows EU to dictate state aid rules. He argues for revisiting withdrawal agreement due to potential impact on businesses trading with Northern Ireland.

Praises right hon. Member for East Antrim (Sammy Wilson) for his advocacy of leaving the EU and thanks hon. Friend for Stone (Sir William Cash). Disagrees with those who never wanted to leave the EU, emphasising that constituents in North East Derbyshire are committed to having left the EU and want clarity by December.

Argues for a deal that protects jobs, businesses, workers' rights, environmental standards, and maintains supply chain integrity. Expresses concern over Government's insistence on sticking to pre-crisis timetable despite economic challenges posed by the pandemic.

Criticised the gap between rhetoric and reality regarding Brexit, highlighted concerns over border checks and trade deals with lower food standards. Emphasised the importance of protecting agricultural interests.

Stressed the importance of achieving a successful deal by December 31st, underlined the risks of no-deal for automotive and farming sectors. Called for clarity on the implications of no deal for supply chains.

Expressed concerns about the Northern Ireland protocol, its impact on trade and regulatory checks, and potential tariffs between Northern Ireland and Great Britain. Highlighted the need for clarity from the Government regarding implementation of the protocol.

The Government's ambition to secure the best possible outcome for the UK during Brexit negotiations is supported, emphasising the importance of a deadline in negotiations. He cites historical context from Sussex and business experience to argue that certainty and deregulation will benefit British businesses post-Brexit. He also supports the idea of securing independent trade deals with countries such as Japan and the US.

Expresses concern over the current state of manufacturing, citing risks to companies like Nissan due to potential tariffs. Questions food standards and environmental protection in future trade deals with the EU. Calls for clarity on new regulations for businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, and urges a pragmatic approach rather than an ideological one.

Emphasises the need to be prepared to walk away from negotiations if necessary, drawing on his experience in business. Believes this will lead to securing a deal without extending the deadline and completing Brexit successfully.

Thanked participants, acknowledged the withdrawal agreement and political declaration, defended scrutiny practices, highlighted engagement with devolved Administrations, emphasised economic benefits of Brexit, reiterated commitment to state aid policy independent from EU rules, dismissed extension of transition period, assured ongoing work for a deal within timeframe, confirmed development of separate subsidy policy, underlined importance of democratic decisions in Northern Ireland regarding the protocol.

Asked about Government's capacity to handle no-deal planning alongside covid-19 management.