← Back to House of Commons Debates

Syria: Security Situation

24 February 2020

Lead MP

Tobias Ellwood

Debate Type

General Debate

Tags

Foreign AffairsBenefits & WelfareChildren & Families
Other Contributors: 27

At a Glance

Tobias Ellwood raised concerns about syria: security situation in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Mr Ellwood expressed deep concern over the deteriorating security situation in north-western Syria, highlighting the displacement of nearly a million people and the death of civilians due to Russian and regime bombardment. He emphasised the need for a ceasefire and condemned Russia's obstruction at the UN Security Council. Mr Ellwood questioned Britain’s role as a P5 member, whether Turkey has requested support from the UK, and how the West can regain its international influence.

Government Response

Foreign AffairsBenefits & WelfareChildren & Families
Government Response
The Minister, James Cleverly, acknowledged the crisis in Syria and highlighted ongoing efforts by the UK to condemn violations of international law. He emphasised financial commitments of £118 million for humanitarian aid in north-western Syria and a total commitment of £3.1 billion since 2011. Stressed ongoing efforts for peace in Syria through diplomatic channels at UN Security Council level. Emphasised the complexity of military intervention and commitment to addressing the situation without escalating violence. I refer the hon. Lady to the answer I gave a few moments ago: the numbers of Syrian refugees coming to the UK will not fundamentally change the situation on the ground. The UK will continue to act with international partners at the UN level and at others to de-escalate the situation and to push to end the violence and the targeting of civilians, because that is the only real, sustainable way to address the situation in Syria. Our representative at the United Nations has spoken in no uncertain terms about how wrong the behaviour of the regime and the Russian backers has been in targeting civilian facilities and civilians. I am very proud of the fact that the UK has supported the humanitarian efforts in the region. We will continue to do so and have committed to doing so in future, but ultimately, the only sustainable solution is a political one in which the regime in Damascus and its Russian backers understand that their actions will not be accepted at the international level. As I say, we continue to work with international partners. We have made it very clear that the regime has stepped well beyond any internationally recognised bounds. We welcome the EU’s adoption of new listings under the Syria sanctions regime—18 businesspeople and two entities have been listed. The UK will continue to work with the international community to ensure that those who profit from the conflict are held to account. The international coalition against Daesh is still in existence. Until that risk has been completely eliminated, I can foresee only that we will work internationally to achieve that. The Government will continue to work with international partners to seek a consensus, to address the actions of the Assad regime and to put in place a politically sustainable future for the people of Syria. I have no doubt that we will continue to do so at the UN level and others. My right hon. Friend’s question is characteristically pithy. I happen to disagree. We still have significant influence on the international stage and we will use it to ensure that this conflict is brought to an end as quickly as possible.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.