The Bill seeks to protect women seeking abortion services from harassment. Demonstrations have included graphic images, misleading leaflets, and emotional pressure tactics. Local councils face significant challenges in implementing buffer zones due to the time-consuming process and legal costs. The police prefer national protections rather than localised measures that require constant renewal. Ealing's PSPO was supported by various organisations including medical bodies and religious figures who understand the importance of women’s rights to privacy and dignity. Without action, similar incidents could escalate into more severe forms of harassment as seen in other countries.

Rises to oppose the Bill, arguing it could damage freedom of speech and that existing legislation already suffices. Cites a Home Secretary’s review from 2018 which found national buffer zones unnecessary due to existing laws against harassment and disorder. She notes that only 36 out of 363 clinics have experienced anti-abortion activities, predominantly passive in nature such as praying, displaying banners, handing out leaflets. Criticises the Bill for being an overreaction and potential infringement on fundamental liberties including freedom of assembly and conscience. Emphasises concerns about silencing minority groups with unpopular opinions and cites support from human rights groups against the proposed zones.

Informs Members that a Division will follow, reminding them of new voting arrangements due to social distancing measures. Announces the Question will be put according to Standing Order No. 23 and advises patience during the process.