← Back to House of Commons Debates
Aviation Banning Orders (Disruptive Passengers)
10 March 2020
Lead MP
Gareth Johnson
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Gareth Johnson raised concerns about aviation banning orders (disruptive passengers) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves a bill proposing that the courts have the power to ban individuals convicted of using or threatening violence on planes for a period set by the court, aiming to prevent such behaviour and protect passengers and crew. The Bill addresses an increase in 'air rage' incidents, estimated at 4,145 cases in the past year, which represents a 9% rise from the previous year.
Gareth Johnson
Con
Dartford
Proposes that banning individuals from flying after being convicted of using or threatening violence on planes would help protect cabin crew and passengers, acting as a deterrent to potential violent incidents. Emphasises the need for targeted measures against selfish, violent behaviour rather than broad restrictions like alcohol bans.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.