← Back to House of Commons Debates
Workers (Definition and Rights)
26 February 2020
Lead MP
Chris Stephens
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyEmployment
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Chris Stephens raised concerns about workers (definition and rights) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Chris Stephens moved to amend the definition of a worker, to make provision about workers’ rights, and to address recent Supreme Court judgments. He emphasised the need for greater protection from day one in employment, eliminating zero-hours contracts, and providing better protection for precarious work, especially in the hospitality sector. He highlighted that current practices promote insecurity and hardship among workers and suggested penalties for employers who change shift notices with short notice.
Chris Stephens
SNP
Glasgow Cathcart
Chris Stephens argued that the Bill would refine worker definitions, provide greater protection to workers from day one of employment, eliminate zero-hours contracts, and give better support to precarious work. He cited examples of individuals affected by zero-hour contracts in Cheshire and Coventry who faced financial instability due to unpredictable income and delays in Universal Credit payments. Stephens also mentioned the Living Wage Foundation's 'insecurity premium' concept which affects those with variable hours and low incomes significantly.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.