← Back to House of Commons Debates

CCRC Decision on 44 Post Office Prosecutions

05 October 2020

Lead MP

Paul Scully

Debate Type

Ministerial Statement

Tags

Justice & CourtsBusiness & Trade
Other Contributors: 35

At a Glance

Paul Scully raised concerns about ccrc decision on 44 post office prosecutions in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Government Statement

Justice & CourtsBusiness & Trade
Government Statement
The Government recognise the detrimental impact of the Horizon dispute on postmasters and their families. On October 2nd, the Post Office responded to the Court of Appeal and Southwark Crown court regarding 47 cases referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, stating it will not oppose 44 out of these cases. The Post Office sincerely apologised for past failings and committed to reviewing historical prosecutions involving around 900 postmasters. It also launched an inquiry chaired by retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams to assess failings related to Horizon.

Shadow Comment

Kevan Jones
Shadow Comment
The shadow minister criticised the government's inadequate response, expressing disappointment that despite the Post Office's announcement not pursuing 44 cases, there is no guarantee of compensation or resolution for affected postmasters. He questioned if the government was involved in the decision to cease prosecutions and demanded a full public inquiry with investigative powers.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.