← Back to House of Commons Debates
Transport for the North: Funding
17 March 2021
Lead MP
Diana R. Johnson
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 4
At a Glance
Diana R. Johnson raised concerns about transport for the north: funding in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Ms Diana R. Johnson raised concerns about a 40% cut in funding to Transport for the North, which she argued undermines levelling up promises. She noted that TfN's core funding allocation was reduced from £10 million to £6 million and smart travel ticketing projects were delayed due to lack of funds. Ms Johnson questioned the Government's commitment to devolution and economic regeneration in northern England.
Diana R. Johnson
Lab
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Ms Diana R. Johnson argued that the Prime Minister’s statement denying funding cuts was incorrect, highlighting that TfN’s core funding had been reduced by £4 million. She noted TfN's role in advising on rail investment and shaping projects but criticised the Government for not supporting key initiatives such as Northern Powerhouse Rail, which could contribute billions to the UK economy.
Pendle
Emphasised that delivering high-quality transport infrastructure in northern England is a top priority for the Government, and stated that Transport for the North’s funding settlement is appropriate and fair. He dismissed concerns about the funding settlement and urged Members to move on from discussing this issue.
Diana R. Johnson
Lab
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Questioned whether the budget for Transport for the North, which was £10 million, has been reduced to £6 million. She also raised concerns about the Minister's conduct during the debate.
Commented that Diana R. Johnson's point was not a formal point of order but noted that it is up to the Member in charge of the Adjournment debate to take a reasonable amount of time and that the Minister has adequate time to respond.
Government Response
Government Response
Transport for the North’s funding settlement is appropriate and fair and enables it to continue to carry out its statutory functions. The Minister dismissed concerns about the funding settlement and urged Members to focus on delivering for the north.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.