← Back to House of Commons Debates
Public Health
30 November 2021
Lead MP
Maggie Throup
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 33
At a Glance
Maggie Throup raised concerns about public health in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves to approve the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings) Regulations and the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (Self-Isolation) Regulations.
Desmond Swayne
Con
New Forest West
Questions the Minister about public appointees giving advice against socialising which contradicts clear scientific advice.
Clarifies that Dr Harries' statements do not represent official government policy and questions the timing of the regulations expiration dates.
Rachael Maskell
Lab Co-op
York Central
Asks why the Government is not listening to public health professionals like Dr Harries who advise on necessary measures against the pandemic.
Challenges whether it's acceptable for Department employees to take positions that conflict with official government policy, questioning if this undermines principles.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Supports the Minister and expresses agreement with guidelines being followed in Northern Ireland as well.
Asks about travel restrictions not covered in today's debate, specifically PCR tests on day two of arrival.
Vicky Foxcroft
Lab
Lewisham North
Raises concerns for immunosuppressed individuals and requests antibody testing to assess their level of protection against the virus.
Clive Betts
Lab
Sheffield South East
Questions the enforceability of mandatory face coverings and highlights enforcement issues in public spaces like shopping centres.
Daisy Cooper
Lib Dem
St Albans
Considers mask wearing regulations unenforceable due to public compliance issues and asks how the Minister intends to set an example when some MPs do not wear masks themselves.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
Questions the logic of different expiration dates for two related statutory instruments, and advocates for a review by Parliament after recess.
Alex Norris
Lab Co-op
Nottingham North and Kimberley
Supports reintroducing masks on public transport and shops due to high transmission risk. Emphasises need for clear guidance on enforcement, especially concerning shop workers who have faced abuse during the pandemic. Criticises inconsistency in policies regarding mask-wearing across different settings.
Mark Harper
Con
Hampshire South West
Inquired about the potential need for parliamentary recall if strengthened measures are required after the House has risen for the Christmas recess, seeking assurance that either sitting or recalling will be decided by the House.
Karl McCartney
Ind
Lincolnshire North East
Asked whether there should be a return to Parliament before Christmas or shortly afterwards if strengthened measures are needed. Raised concerns about inconsistency in regulations across different indoor settings.
Mark Harper
Con
Forest of Dean
My right hon. Friend raises important points about parliamentary time and suggests that it was possible to debate the measures before they came into force, emphasising the availability of parliamentary time when the Government wants to do something.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
My hon. Friend questions the justification for a lockdown in light of current circumstances, arguing that there is no conceivable way the NHS will be overwhelmed by this variant due to 90% of the population having antibodies.
Desmond Swayne
Con
New Forest West
My hon. Friend points out the potential for another pingdemic as Christmas approaches, undermining efforts to increase vaccinations and removing a key incentive for people to get vaccinated if self-isolation rules are removed.
My hon. Friend explores the issue of what happens when there is a new variant, questioning the sustainability of a policy that involves continuous cycles of measures, vaccine development, and subsequent freedoms, suggesting this approach might be unsustainable and counterproductive.
Central Ayrshire
Discussed the emergence of the Omicron variant, highlighting its heavily mutated nature and potential for increased transmissibility. Emphasised the importance of PCR testing over lateral flow tests due to their ability to detect S-gene dropout, indicating a possible omicron case. Advocated for stricter travel quarantine measures and called for domestic precautions such as mask-wearing in public spaces, schools, and workplaces.
Steve Brine
Con
Winchester
Brine criticised the extension of the Coronavirus Act without a vote and expressed concern about the low attendance in the House during an important debate. He questioned the necessity and timing of new regulations, suggesting they had a chilling effect on society and businesses. He was particularly concerned about the impact of self-isolation regulations on education and emphasised the need for clarity regarding definitions such as 'suspected' cases.
Daisy Cooper
Lib Dem
St Albans
The Liberal Democrats support the regulations but have grave concerns about whether the Government are doing enough to protect people, particularly with respect to mask-wearing and financial support for those in self-isolation. They also advocate for the reintroduction of 'work from home if you can' encouragement, improved ventilation measures in schools, and addressing NHS pressures including ambulance service delays and GP workload issues.
Christchurch
Mr Chope criticises the regulations, arguing they are oppressive and not supported by evidence. He questions why shops cannot permit vaccinated individuals to shop without masks and why those who have been fully vaccinated are treated similarly to unvaccinated individuals in terms of mask-wearing requirements. Mr Chope also expresses concern over the lack of consistency in enforcement regarding reasonable excuses for not wearing face coverings and the potential for these regulations to suppress individual freedom.
Daisy Cooper
Lib Dem
St Albans
Ms Cooper intervenes, suggesting that the primary incentive for vaccination is reducing personal risk of hospitalisation and death rather than being able to engage in social activities freely.
Alec Shelbrooke
Con
Wetherby and Easingwold
Mr Shelbrooke asks if there is a mechanism to clarify points before the vote, referencing Mr Chope's speech about inconsistencies and lack of evidence in the regulations.
Huw Merriman
Con
Bewdley
I intervened on the Secretary of State and was assured that measures would not be kept in place longer than necessary. I support proportionate measures for an unknown variant's impact but have concerns about singling out transport as unsafe compared to hospitality, which may send a negative message to rail users. On self-isolation regulations (regulation 1338), the lack of end date and default setting until March could lead to another 'pingdemic'. If omicron proves less harmful than delta, strict isolation rules might hinder immunity development. The beta variant example shows that variants can quickly become less concerning; thus, legislation should be flexible and not overreach. Concerns also exist about PCR testing costs for travel restrictions.
Nigel Evans
Con
Blackpool North and Cleveleys
Evans noted the time constraints for the debate, urging all speakers to be mindful of their contribution length so that the Minister has sufficient time to respond. No additional policy details or statistics were provided.
Mark Harper
Con
Fittleworth
Mr Harper supports the Government's resistance to economically damaging measures such as working from home and vaccine passports, which he deems ineffective and illiberal. He acknowledges the NHS is under pressure but argues that it is not due to a high number of COVID-19 patients; instead, it stems from backlogged cases during the pandemic. He supports transparency in data regarding hospital capacity and pressures on discharge due to social care inadequacies. Mr Harper endorses face-covering regulations for their short-term nature but opposes self-isolation regulations due to lack of clarity and concerns about a potential new 'pingdemic'.
Daisy Cooper
Lib Dem
St Albans
Ms Cooper recognises Mr Harper's assertion regarding the percentage of patients in hospitals due to COVID-19 but highlights its wider impact on hospital operations, including ward closures for cleaning and staff absenteeism. She calls for an assessment from the Government detailing the overall impact of COVID-19 patients on bed availability, staffing levels, and elective procedures.
Steven Baker
Con
Wycombe
The debate is not about the incremental inconvenience of mandating face masks, but rather it is about taking away public's right to choose based on uncertain evidence. There is a concern over economic costs and psychological harm to children from prolonged restrictions. The speaker questions where hope comes from in Government’s response and whether society will be managed as empty vessels or free spirits with dignity of choice. He also raises a case for a constituent stuck in South Africa due to travel bans.
Ben Spencer
Con
Runnymede and Weybridge
The debate is about uncertainty regarding the Omicron variant's impact and the direct effects of new restrictions. There are concerns over disproportionate impacts on children, chilling effect on social activities and economic sectors, lack of clarity in three weeks’ time about domestic data compared to international data due to differing vaccine roll-outs, and overall uncertainty in decision-making without proper scrutiny.
Bob Seely
Con
Isle of Wight
Seely argues for a balanced view on the precautionary principle, criticising overreaction during the pandemic as harmful to younger and poorer populations. He highlights repeated failures in forecasting by Professor Ferguson, including underestimating deaths from past diseases like foot-and-mouth and BSE, and overestimating deaths from swine flu and bird flu. Seely also mentions criticism of Ferguson's models during the current COVID-19 pandemic for being overly pessimistic and lacking credibility when compared to real-world outcomes. He calls for an inquiry into forecasting success and principles to guide future policy decisions.
Sammy Wilson
DUP
East Antrim
Wilson supports Seely's criticism of the reliance on overly pessimistic predictions, citing a Health Minister in Northern Ireland who quoted Ferguson’s predictions about 'biblical proportions' of deaths to scare people.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
Agrees with the issue of vaccine slot availability and supports SI No. 1340 on face coverings based on The BMJ evidence but expresses concern over SI No. 1338 due to lack of sunset provision and concerns about 'suspected of' clause in regulations. Worries that businesses might see these measures as the new normal, impacting investment decisions.
Maggie Throup
Lab
Erewash
The Minister for Care has concluded the debate by explaining that these regulations are necessary to slow down the spread of a new variant, allowing science time to catch up. She emphasised the need for balanced measures and stated that restrictions will be reviewed in three weeks' time. The Minister also addressed concerns about financial support for those required to self-isolate legally, confirming that they can apply for test and trace support payments if eligible.
Government Response
Government Response
I thank my right hon. Friend for his comments, which will have been heard on the Treasury Bench. The regulations are precautionary and proportionate, designed to safeguard the gains made by the vaccination programme. The Government will closely monitor emerging data on the new variant and review measures in three weeks' time.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.