← Back to House of Commons Debates
Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill 2019-21 - New Clause 1, New Clauses 2 to 4 and various amendments
26 October 2021
Lead MP
Stephen Farry
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
Northern Ireland
Other Contributors: 24
At a Glance
Stephen Farry raised concerns about northern ireland (executive formation) bill 2019-21 - new clause 1, new clauses 2 to 4 and various amendments in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves that the clause be read a Second time. Proposes new clauses for joint election of First Ministers and identical status, powers, and responsibilities. Includes provisions for weighted majority vote in the Assembly without use of designations. Also proposes amendments to restore Good Friday Agreement provision for joint election by the Assembly of the joint First Ministers.
Lindsay Hoyle
Speaker
Chorley
Discusses multiple new clauses and amendments introduced, including provisions for joint election of First Ministers, identical status and responsibilities, weighted majority vote in the Assembly without use of designations. Also covers restoring Good Friday Agreement provision for joint election by the Assembly.
Gavin Robinson
DUP
Belfast East
Robinson agrees that the Bill reflects New Decade, New Approach but suggests caution against extensive amendment unless there is joint agreement on a range of issues through another forum. He highlights the importance of maintaining stability and avoiding unnecessary changes.
Julian Smith
Con
Skipton and Ripon
Supports the debate on the First Minister’s titles but argues that other amendments are not appropriate for this Bill. He emphasises the importance of implementing clauses asserting the continuation of Executive roles in case a First or Deputy First Minister exits power sharing, citing witnesses from Committee discussions and the need to avoid another three years without government as seen in 2017. He advocates for the removal of the two-month commencement date to ensure quicker implementation of the Bill's provisions.
Colum Eastwood
SDLP
Foyle
Welcomes many provisions but expresses deep concern over the political context, especially regarding the DUP’s threats to pull down the Assembly. Discusses issues related to the election of First and Deputy First Ministers and highlights the failure of Unionist parties in addressing nationalist participation in key roles like the Justice Department. Calls for resolving the issue through new clause 3, emphasising the need for stability and addressing real problems rather than constant debate over titles.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Supports extending the period to ensure stability and prevent crises. Acknowledges the need for devolution but criticises the current political instability in Northern Ireland. Highlights the importance of delivering services in education, health, housing, and infrastructure during interregnums.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Shannon welcomed the Minister to his new role and expressed a preference for devolution over direct rule. He argued that issues should be debated within Northern Ireland's Assembly rather than being tagged onto other Bills. Shannon highlighted the interference by Westminster during the abortion issue, emphasising the need for local decision-making in health, education, policing, and other key areas. He pointed out waiting times for medical procedures such as hip replacements and cataract surgeries are excessively long in Northern Ireland post-covid, with a lack of classroom assistants in schools and delays in assessment for ADHD and autism cases. Shannon urged the Government to allow the Assembly to prioritise need over political wishes.
Pontypridd
Welcomes attempts to safeguard power sharing. Suggests the Secretary of State should respond to the forthcoming report on a Bill of Rights and request advice from the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. Proposes the re-establishment of a civic forum as envisaged under the Good Friday agreement.
Dwyfor Meirionnydd
Asked when an Irish language Act will be brought forward, highlighting the importance of such legislation in celebrating culture and bringing people together.
Conor McGinn
Lab
Wirral West
McGinn questions the Minister about the commitment to an Irish language Act and other cultural provisions. He seeks clarity on when the Government will bring forward this legislative package as previously committed.
Stephen Farry
SDLP
North Down
Farry thanks everyone for their contributions and acknowledges the tension between implementing New Decade, New Approach faithfully and anticipating future crises. He does not intend to push amendments to a vote today but believes there may be an opportunity for further reflection and consultation with Northern Ireland parties.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Intervened to ask for more clarity on when the cultural package might be seen and if it will need legislation from Westminster. Expresses understanding of how the Secretary of State envisages dealing with the matter.
Stephen Farry
SDLP
North Down
Asked for an assurance that if the House of Lords considers potential further reforms and soundings show consensus from Northern Ireland political parties, the Government will be open-minded about legislating to put them into effect.
Pontypridd
Supports the Bill to safeguard power sharing but urges fast-tracking its passage. Cites evidence that devolved power sharing is overwhelmingly popular with voters and emphasises the importance of a functioning Executive amid current instability in Northern Ireland.
Brandon Lewis
Con
[INTERVENTION] Clarifies that there has never been discussion about an Irish language Act; instead, it is a cultural package. Emphasises the importance of delivering on this commitment.
Richard Thomson
Lab
Welcomes the Bill's contribution to securing a prosperous and well-governed Northern Ireland, emphasising that democratic politics needs space for discussion and consensus-building. Supports Clause 2 as it enhances transparency, accountability, and opportunities for good governance.
Carla Lockhart
DUP
Upper Bann
Lockhart supports a stable Stormont and criticises the UK government's inaction during Sinn Féin's disruption. She calls for caution against future interventions that could undermine devolution and stresses the importance of addressing concerns regarding the Northern Ireland protocol.
Colum Eastwood
SDLP
Foyle
Eastwood agrees with Lockhart's comments about Sinn Féin but challenges her to speak against threats from her own party regarding the protocol, which he sees as a threat to Good Friday agreement institutions.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Hoare agrees that business views should be heard but questions why tearing down Stormont and removing local voices would help those businesses, indicating a support for devolution stability.
Claire Hanna
SDLP
Belfast South and Mid Down
Ms Hanna emphasised that without genuine belief in power sharing, rules alone cannot force cooperation. She cited examples of governance failures due to lack of accountability, such as the renewable heat incentive scheme scandal. She also raised concerns about the current designation structures fostering sectarianism and advocated for their review.
Tan Dhesi
Lab
Slough
Mr Dhesi agreed that a functioning Northern Ireland Assembly is crucial for local governance, criticising the UK Government's approach to Brexit and the Northern Ireland protocol as detrimental to stability.
Stephen Farry
Alliance Party
North Down
Mr Farry questioned a specific party's reluctance to expedite language and culture provisions through the Northern Ireland Assembly, implying support for local action rather than waiting for UK Parliament intervention.
Ian Paisley criticises the two-faced approach of some Members who claim to support the Belfast Agreement while proposing changes. He accuses certain MPs of wanting to uphold sectarianism and challenges Claire Hanna's speech.
Claire Hanna
SDLP
Belfast South and Mid Down
Claire Hanna objects to being misquoted by Ian Paisley, clarifying that she criticised the current designation mechanisms for locking in sectarianism rather than supporting it.
Colum Eastwood
SDLP
Foyle
Eastwood intervenes to remind Ian Paisley of historical context, including his party's opposition during the Good Friday Agreement negotiations. He emphasises that his party has been implementing the agreement since St Andrews.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.