← Back to House of Commons Debates
Child Marriage Prohibition Bill - Clause 1 (Minimum age of marriage)
19 November 2021
Lead MP
Pauline Latham
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 23
At a Glance
Pauline Latham raised concerns about child marriage prohibition bill - clause 1 (minimum age of marriage) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves the Child Marriage Prohibition Bill, aiming to set a blanket minimum age for marriage at 18 in England and Wales. Argues that current laws allowing marriages at 16 with parental consent are outdated and often lead to child coercion and abuse. Cites examples of children being coerced into early marriages, impacting their education and future prospects. Emphasises the need to protect vulnerable young people from harmful practices and uphold international commitments against child marriage.
Gagan Mohindra
Con
South West Hertfordshire
Compliments Ms Latham on her work to bring the Bill to the House. Supports the proposal to prevent children from being coerced into marriage, highlighting that current laws enable abuse through parental consent.
Robert Buckland
Con
Praises Ms Latham's work and agrees that recent legislation has shifted the perspective on child victims. Argues against the mechanism of parental consent, stating it can be used as a vehicle for abuse.
Virendra Sharma
Lab
Ealing, Southall
Supports Ms Latham's stance on child marriage, referencing personal experience and emphasising the negative impact of early marriages on education and poverty levels for women and girls.
Robin Millar
Con
West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Congratulates Ms Latham on bringing forward the Bill, highlighting its importance in tackling child marriage. Asks about patterns of communities or traditions where this practice is more prevalent.
Anthony Mangnall
Con
Darlington
Supports Ms Latham's efforts, highlighting the Foreign Secretary’s pledge to tackle child marriage internationally and enquires about enforcement mechanisms within the Home Office or relevant Department.
Sajid Javid
Con
Bromsgrove
Praises Ms Latham for championing the Bill, agreeing that it is vital legislation to clearly demonstrate opposition to child marriage in the UK.
Robin Millar
Con
West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Reiterates support for the Bill, highlighting the importance of upholding marriage as a noble institution while addressing harmful practices.
Sarah Champion
Lab
Rotherham
Champion supports the amendment because it addresses child protection and highlights that most cases of child marriage are non-registered religious or customary marriages. She provides statistics showing that 3,096 children aged 16 to 17 were legally married between 2007 and 2017 in England and Wales. She also shares a personal anecdote about a friend who was forced into a child marriage at age 16.
[INTERVENTION] Sharma agrees that forced marriages and honour-based abuse are interlinked with child marriage, which he considers to be child abuse.
Selaine Saxby
Con
Tiverton and Honiton
Saxby supports the amendment by emphasising that marriage is a serious undertaking and should not be entered into lightly. She cites statistics showing that at least four times as many girls as boys are involved in child marriages, leading to various negative outcomes such as leaving education early and limited career opportunities.
Ben Spencer
Con
Runnymede and Weybridge
Mr Spencer supports raising the marriage age to 18, arguing that it is a serious decision with significant legal and financial implications. He believes the current allowance for parental consent at ages 16-17 is odd given the personal nature of marriage. Mr Spencer advocates for aligning marriage legislation with principles from the Mental Capacity Act by ensuring full competence and willingness when making such decisions. He emphasises the importance of maturity and the impact of age on romantic choices.
[INTERVENTION] Ms Mackrory agrees with Mr Spencer, stating that the Bill modernises marriage legislation and grants young people autonomy to make decisions about marriage without parental control.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Andrew Slaughter supports the Bill, arguing that allowing marriage at ages 16 and 17 blurs lines and may encourage child marriage. He cites research showing domestic violence and sexual abuse in marriages involving minors and highlights a UN recommendation to raise the minimum age for marriage to 18. He also points out that forced marriage disproportionately affects girls and women, calling for more government support to protect those at risk.
Tom Pursglove
Con
Corby
Supports the Bill and emphasises its importance in ending child marriage. Argues that raising the minimum age to 18 will send a strong message against child marriage both domestically and internationally. He also highlights the Government's commitment to tackling violence against women and girls, including forced marriage, through various measures such as training professionals, providing funding for helplines, and developing educational resources.
Gagan Mohindra
Con
South West Hertfordshire
Welcomes the Minister to his place and asks whether Northern Ireland and Scotland will follow suit in raising the marriage age to 18.
Pauline Latham
Con
Mid Derbyshire
Responds that Northern Ireland is consulting on changing its law, while Scotland faces obligations under UN sustainable development goals. She expresses hope for consistent measures across the UK.
James Sunderland
Constitutional
Workington
Commends the Bill's focus on children and highlights its importance in protecting young people from exploitation through child marriage.
Anthony Mangnall
Con
Twin Valley
Questions whether the Minister can further ensure that those involved in arranging forced marriages are held accountable, emphasising the need for enforcement and prosecution.
James Daly
Con
Londonderry North East
Highlights issues with current criminal justice processes that can delay prosecutions and suggests improvements to support victims during this period.
Sarah Champion
Lab
Rotherham
Raises concerns about the delayed implementation of mandatory relationship education and introduces the teaspoon campaign as a practical measure for protecting children taken abroad for marriages.
Nickie Aiken
Con
City, University and Westminster
Praises the Bill and suggests training local councillors to understand cultural differences related to forced marriage practices.
Virendra Sharma
Lab
Ealing Central and Acton
Acknowledges best practices in Ealing and questions whether the Government can adopt best practices from outside Britain, such as those seen in India's recent legislation.
Pauline Latham
Con
Central Derbyshire
Thanked those who participated in the debate, emphasising that it would change lives and life chances for millions of girls and young boys. Acknowledged support from Clerks of the House, the Department, and cross-party initiative including former Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland. Looked forward to the Bill going into Committee stage.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.