← Back to House of Commons Debates
Health Measures at UK Borders
27 January 2021
Lead MP
Priti Patel
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 27
At a Glance
Priti Patel raised concerns about health measures at uk borders in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Government Statement
The Home Secretary, Priti Patel, made an announcement addressing the ongoing challenges posed by the coronavirus pandemic in the UK. She highlighted the Government's focus on protecting the country’s leading vaccination programme and reducing the risk of new virus strains being transmitted from abroad. The statement included a range of measures to strengthen health checks at borders, such as increased police checks for compliance with self-isolation rules, refusal of entry for non-UK residents from red-listed countries, and mandatory hotel quarantine for those who cannot be refused entry. For outbound travel, the Government will introduce stricter enforcement through declarations on the reason for travel, increased police presence at ports, and a review of travel exemptions to ensure only essential reasons are included. The Home Secretary emphasised that these measures aim to protect public health and support the vaccination programme.
Torfaen
Question
Mr. Thomas-Symonds raised concerns about the effectiveness of the new hotel quarantining system, specifically questioning how travellers could arrive with emergent strains via countries not on the control list and whether support is being provided to improve quarantine compliance and isolation assurance services.
Minister reply
The Home Secretary responded by underscoring the necessity of the measures announced today to protect public health. She acknowledged questions about implementation but did not provide specific answers, instead emphasising that these steps are crucial to reducing transmission risks.
Chris Philp
Con
Croydon South
Question
Mr. Philp inquired about the number of hotel rooms required for the new managed isolation process and sought assurance regarding the availability of sufficient accommodation.
Minister reply
The Home Secretary confirmed that discussions are underway with hotel chains to ensure adequate provision of rooms for the mandatory 10-day quarantine. She also stated that further details on this approach will be provided by the Department of Health and Social Care next week.
Diana Johnson
Lab
Kingston upon Hull North
Question
Ms. Johnson asked about the impact of these measures on holidaymakers and the aviation sector, specifically requesting a timeline for a sector-specific support package.
Minister reply
The Home Secretary acknowledged the importance of supporting affected sectors but did not provide a specific timeline for a sector-specific support package. She emphasised that protecting public health is paramount and that all necessary steps will be taken to mitigate the spread of the virus.
Torfaen
Question
The MP expressed deep concern about the measures outlined by the Home Secretary, arguing that they were insufficient in protecting borders against new virus variants. He questioned how travellers could enter via countries not on the control list and sought details on support for quarantine compliance and improvements to the isolation assurance service.
Minister reply
Home Secretary Priti Patel responded by emphasising previous measures since January 2020, including Foreign Office advice, statutory instruments, and test and release policies. She outlined new enhancements such as increased police presence at ports, borders, and airports; enhanced IAS checks with more than 5,000 daily contacts; targeted follow-up visits increasing by about 1,000 per day.
Question
MP Huw Merriman welcomed the evidence-based approach outlined by the Home Secretary and questioned whether criteria for adding or removing countries from the hotel quarantine list would be published and subject to scrutiny.
Minister reply
Home Secretary Priti Patel acknowledged that logistical challenges exist but emphasised the importance of keeping freight moving. She confirmed that changes in guidance and advice will be communicated across Government Departments, including the Department for Health and Social Care, the Department for Transport, and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.
Joanna Cherry
SNP
Edinburgh South West
Question
I thank the Home Secretary for her statement and for advance sight of it. My Scottish Government colleagues are concerned that her proposals do not go far enough; I would be grateful if she would confirm that she will listen to their representations. In April and May of last year, I wrote to the Home Secretary asking for comprehensive health protections at the UK’s external borders, and I referred to the measures being introduced in other countries. Last week, the Home Secretary admitted that we were right, so why did she fail to take precautions needed at the start of the pandemic? What stopped her from closing the borders? Will she commission an assessment of what contribution failing to close borders earlier has made to the death toll and put results in the public domain?
Minister reply
First, I repeat that we work with all devolved Administrations. Regarding precautions at the start of the pandemic, self-isolation measures were introduced from January 2020 onwards, including guidance for UK airports and travel advice by FCDO. We introduced mandatory quarantine and passenger locator form in June last year, closed borders to Denmark after strain identification, and introduced test and release and pre-travel testing bans on flights from South Africa. Each measure adds a layer of protection against virus transmission.
Graham Brady
Con
Altrincham and Sale West
Question
We all hope new variants will be combated by vaccines, but if new countries need to be added to the red list, will the Home Secretary speak urgently to the Chancellor about support for our aviation sector to prevent a haemorrhaging of jobs?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is right in speaking of the sector as an operational partner with which we work every day. Discussions continue regarding new lists or travel bans and necessary support will be provided.
Yvette Cooper
Lab
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Question
The Brazil and South Africa variants have been identified across continents, and less than 1% of new cases in the first wave came from China. May I ask about the number of people likely still to be arriving who are not covered by quarantine hotels, who do not have to take further tests on arrival, and will go straight onto public transport? Can she confirm that this is likely still thousands each day, and does she think it is wise?
Minister reply
I thank the right hon. Lady for her question. Every measure introduced across Government provides degrees of protection; travel bans are in place for red-listed countries, and measures announced today will reduce the number of travellers. Border Force has given examples to show unacceptable behaviour by some travellers. The hotel measures and package under discussion aim to reduce risk and ensure proper quarantine.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
Question
I thank the Home Secretary for her statement. Marjorie from Crook got in touch with me today, saying that Labour is playing politics with coronavirus by criticising our border measures before as a ‘blunt tool’ and now saying they do not go far enough. Does my right hon. Friend agree with Marjorie that it is irresponsible to play politics with coronavirus? Will she ensure if these measures need to be extended to other countries, that will be done at the earliest opportunity?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right; the Opposition’s flip-flopping and claims are not helpful. The Government will take action on rolling out travel bans to other countries where new strains emerge.
Alistair Carmichael
Lib Dem
Orkney and Shetland
Question
Many of those caught by these new measures will be travelling due to family bereavement, often incurring substantial costs at short notice. Can she tell me if there will be some sort of financial assistance available for people of modest means who find themselves in this position?
Minister reply
The right hon. Gentleman is right to highlight such circumstances; the Government are already discussing exemptions and support packages, although details cannot be confirmed yet as work is ongoing.
David Amess
Con
Southend East
Question
I very much support my right hon. Friend’s announcement of restrictions at our borders as a result of the current health crisis. Would she reassure me that regional airports, such as Southend, will be tasked to strictly enforce those rules?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right; all airport operators take responsibility for enforcing coronavirus measures and restrictions, including social distancing and keeping passengers apart.
Rachel Hopkins
Lab
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Question
I am very concerned about the continued threat of covid-19 to frontline Border Force staff at Heathrow, as the new draconian fixed-team working rosters have made social distancing difficult at the same time as covid transmission rates have been at their highest. Can the Home Secretary confirm reports that covid-secure bubbles have repeatedly been breached due to understaffing and the new fixed rosters, and specifically outline what assessment she has made of the adequacy of all Border Force staff’s working conditions?
Minister reply
I thank the hon. Lady for her important question. Border Force staff are on the frontline day in, day out trying to protect the public from the spread of the virus. They are doing exceptional work, and yesterday I thanked them for the work they are doing. In terms of measures that are in place to protect them, I am absolutely focused on protecting our Border Force staff. It is absolutely right that that takes place. The head of Border Force and my colleagues across the Border Force team have been working assiduously with all Border Force colleagues, particularly at Heathrow airport, because it is a busy airport as we saw that on Saturday night, when queues formed because we are enforcing 100% compliance checks. With that, of course, I come back to my point about working with Heathrow Airport Ltd on the measures it is putting in place for social distancing, keeping passengers distanced from Border Force staff and, of course, ensuring that my staff are protected. That is my No. 1 priority.
Question
I support the proportionate approach my right hon. Friend has adopted, but can she help me in relation to two linked matters? She said that she will be looking urgently at the exceptions. Will she particularly bear in mind the need to make provision for those who may be repatriated for urgent medical treatment? Should the extension—we hope it does not—involve any British overseas territory, will she bear in mind the need for early consultation with them?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Cases of medical exemptions and emergencies have always been on the exemption list, and the exemption list is under review right now. Colleagues across all Government Departments are reviewing the exemption list. When changes are made, they will be publicised through the usual channels. Anything that would also affect overseas territories will also be under consideration, and that will also be put in the public domain.
Question
I listened very carefully to the Home Secretary’s earlier answer to the Chair of the Select Committee, my right hon. Friend the Member for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford (Yvette Cooper), and she did not answer a rather direct and important question, which she will have estimates for, because this will be a policy based on evidence. How many people does the Home Secretary expect each day to have to go into quarantine in a hotel, and how many people entering the UK each day does she estimate will not have to go into quarantine under these new measures?
Minister reply
First, it is important to recognise that we do have numbers in terms of how many people are coming through our border every single day. These new measures—it is important to put this in context—will bring those numbers even further down. We still have a lot of British nationals who are travelling, and the advice and the guidance are clear that people should not be travelling and should be staying at home. Through the enforcement measures, that will reduce dramatically. The Government are already working out capacity in terms of hotel accommodation in the light of the period of self-isolation that will be required. The Government will happily share those figures with colleagues in due course.
Question
It is absolutely right that the Government take the necessary and appropriate steps to keep our country safe from these new variants of the virus that are emerging around the world, and I welcome the Home Secretary’s statement, but she will know that any additional restrictions on travel will further damage the aviation sector, which has been deeply impacted by this pandemic. When businesses in other sectors have been forced to close or are unable to trade because of restrictions, specific financial support has been made available, so will the Home Secretary talk to the Secretary of State for Transport and the Chancellor to see what specific support can now be provided for airlines and airports to ensure that they are in a position to help lead our recovery in the future?
Minister reply
I give my hon. Friend every assurance that we are working together across Transport, the Treasury and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office on the aviation and travel sector. Conversations and discussions are under way. As I said earlier, they are our operational partners. We work collectively with them, so those discussions are under way, and I just give my hon. Friend that assurance.
Question
How will the quarantine hotels be selected? Will the Home Secretary set a limit on how far such a hotel can be from the arrival airport, so as to minimise risks during transfers, for which I assume she will also be responsible?
Minister reply
With regard to hotels and these measures, as I have already indicated, that work is under way in terms of looking at the procurement of hotels, who the partners are going to be and also further information around them. Government will be setting out over the coming days further information with regard to hotels and the processes around them. As I indicated earlier, discussions on logistical and operational aspects of that work are under way right now, so my colleagues will come back to the House and provide that information.
Question
I thank the Home Secretary for her statement. Protecting the British people quite rightly has to be our priority, so it is right that our border measures have been under constant review since the pandemic began. In the light of today’s announcement, can my right hon. Friend confirm that Border Force and other frontline emergency workers will be given all the support they need to enforce these rules, so that they can keep themselves and the British public safe?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Border Force is doing incredible work on the frontline; I am seeing that and getting reports of that every single day. It is important that its staff stay safe, which is why we have strong measures in place for them. Enforcement, whether it is through policing or the IAS, has been accelerated, along with the checks. The fact of the matter is that we have clear checks: the passenger locator form must be completed, there are fines for non-compliance, and there is a requirement for self-isolation for arrivals. These measures and checks are in place, and they will be increased to protect public health.
Question
It has been widely reported that the Home Secretary called for tougher sanctions at the border than these somewhat reduced measures she has announced today. Has she been overruled and undermined yet again?
Minister reply
I refer the hon. Gentleman to my statement and the measures that have been announced. It is important to recognise that every single measure that has been put in place, including a ban on international travel for high-risk countries, is to protect the British public. Those measures, along with all the other measures announced today, are part of the layer of protection to reduce transmission of the virus and reduce the risk of a new, dangerous variant coming into the United Kingdom.
Matt Western
Lab
Warwick and Leamington
Question
The Secretary of State said that a layered approach has been taken since January last year, but we saw rugby fans coming from Italy, and we saw football fans coming from Spain in early March. Those may not have been identified as dangerous or high-risk countries, but clearly they were. We seem to be shutting the arrivals gate after the virus has bolted. How does she suggest we will identify those nations across the globe where new variants will be developing? Clearly it is not just Brazil and South Africa. People continue to travel around the world.
Minister reply
I mentioned in my statement that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the Department of Health and Social Care are now supporting other countries around the world when it comes to gene sequencing and genomic testing capabilities, which will help to identify new strains and new variants. That is important, because it is a vital step in the global response, in terms of not just protecting our public here but identifying new and dangerous strains that could go around the world and then come to the UK.
Question
I welcome the proportionate nature of the Home Secretary’s statement. May I take her back to the question I asked her during the urgent question yesterday? Given that these measures are to deal with the risk of a new strain of the virus coming to the United Kingdom that might not be susceptible to the vaccine, and given that the UK chief scientific adviser said that the virus will be with us forever, is this a permanent regime, with countries being added to and taken off the red list as appropriate? If it is not permanent, what is the trigger for removing it in the future?
Minister reply
My right hon. Friend asks a very important question. In terms of permanency, we are living with this virus; that is a fact. In better news, we are just weeks away from seeing people who have had the vaccine develop immunity, so circumstances are changing. We have known throughout this situation that things change, so we keep all our measures under review—whether it is changes to travel bans for specific countries or other measures, they will always be under review. The Government will not hesitate to take measures when it comes to preventing a new strain from coming to the United Kingdom once it has been identified and making sure that we take the right measures to protect the public. As I have said a number of times, at every stage we will keep the House informed and, importantly, we will make sure that advice is communicated to the British public, so that when things change, including at the border, they are kept informed.
Clive Efford
Lab
Eltham and Chislehurst
Question
Last week, the Home Secretary told a private meeting of Conservative party members that she was calling for borders to be closed back in March 2020. If it was right then, it must apply even more so in the face of this new variant. So can she reassure the House that she has told her Cabinet colleagues that the measures that she has announced today are sufficient to protect our borders and prevent a new variant from entering the country?
Minister reply
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the point that I made earlier that there is no single measure that mitigates risk or eradicates risk entirely. Every aspect, every measure that has been brought into place, since January last year and more recently, has helped to reduce the risk of the spread of coronavirus and protect our world-leading vaccine programme.
Martin Vickers
Con
Brigg and Immingham
Question
While I recognise the negative impact on businesses and individuals, I give my right hon. Friend my full support on these proposals and I am confident that that would be the overwhelming view of my constituents. Could I turn to those people who will be resident in hotels? Clearly, there will be an element of contact between them, however well policed it is. Could she give an assurance that there will be appropriate measures in place to limit mixing to the absolute minimum?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right because it is social contact—contact with people—that spreads this virus, which is why the measures in place, but also the current advice with lockdown, are to stay at home and not to travel.
Question
Last month, the World Health Organisation and the EU Transport Commissioner censured France for its border closures, which disrupted vital food, medicine and other goods, as well as causing Christmas chaos at the door of the Dover border. Can my right hon. Friend confirm that the UK’s proportionate public health border measures continue to exempt hauliers in line with recommended international practice during the pandemic, and will she join me in calling on France to follow the UK’s lead and remove unnecessary trade restrictions on the Dover-Calais route?
Minister reply
That is absolutely right. My hon. Friend, like me, will recognise the incredible work that took place in December, and actually is still taking place when it comes to testing road hauliers to allow the flow of goods and freight.
Dave Doogan
SNP
Angus and Perthshire Glens
Question
My hon. and learned Friend the Member for Edinburgh South West (Joanna Cherry) wrote to the Home Secretary last April raising concerns about passengers entering the UK via airports without health checks or quarantining. Five weeks later, the Home Secretary replied to her stating that, in her view, 8 June was the right time to introduce a requirement on passengers to self-isolate for 14 days, that they could be contacted to ensure compliance, and that any breach of compliance was punishable with a £1,000 fine. Can she update the House: how many £1,000 fines were issued as a result of this, and does she regret her role in the Government’s dithering over quarantine while covid accessed our communities through airports?
Minister reply
On Government health measures at the border, the hon. Gentleman will be very clear—I suggest that he reads my statement yesterday and the points that were made then—on the measures that have been brought in since January last year. Border Force has checked over 3.7 million passengers and, specifically with regard to fixed penalty notices, thousands of FPNs have been issued; fines have been issued as well.
Question
As the Home Secretary knows, more than 8,000 people entered the UK last year by crossing the channel in small vessels in order to claim asylum when they arrived. Will she say what impact her statement today will have on the system for managing quarantine for people who arrive and enter the asylum system? Given the recent major outbreak of coronavirus at Napier barracks in Folkestone, where many have been accommodated, will she confirm that the Home Office is working to reduce the number of asylum claimants at Napier and that there will be no new people arriving until the covid outbreak is under control?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right to speak of clandestine entry. First of all, rules will apply, and testing will apply, to everyone with regard to illegal entry to the United Kingdom and those seeking to claim asylum.
Layla Moran
Lib Dem
Oxford West and Abingdon
Question
In the week when we have counted 100,000 dead, the Home Secretary’s announcement is, of course, welcome—better late than never—but these measures will not work without 100% compliance with isolation. Currently, only one in five people asked to self-isolate in the UK does so. Evidence that we have examined in the all-party parliamentary group on coronavirus shows clearly that carrots are often very much more effective than sticks when it comes to such measures, so does she agree that if the Government ensured that there was no loss of earnings from isolation, as other countries do, that might help improve compliance with self-isolation and so cut those chains of transmission?
Minister reply
It is important to put this into the context of travel and the measures and checks that we have put in place around compliance. I have already stated that Border Force is undertaking 100% checks at PCPs.
Shadow Comment
Nick Thomas-Symonds
Shadow Comment
In his response, Nick Thomas-Symonds, Labour MP for Torfaen, criticised the Government's late action in protecting borders against new virus strains. He noted that mutations of the virus pose a significant threat to vaccine efficacy and life, and highlighted past failures in quarantine compliance and delayed introduction of border testing systems. The shadow minister called for comprehensive hotel quarantining and raised several concerns about the effectiveness and implementation of the proposed measures. He questioned how travellers with emergent strains could be detected if they arrive from countries not on the control list and sought clarification on improvements to quarantine compliance and support for these measures.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.