← Back to House of Commons Debates
Economic Responsibility and a Plan for Growth
19 October 2022
Lead MP
Lindsay Hoyle
Chorley
Speaker
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 52
At a Glance
Lindsay Hoyle raised concerns about economic responsibility and a plan for growth in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lindsay Hoyle
Speaker
Chorley
I inform the House that I have not selected the amendment.
Rachel Reeves
Lab
Leeds West and Pudsey
The Conservative mini-Budget has caused financial chaos, high inflation rates, and increased energy costs. It has led to higher mortgage payments for millions of people and undermines the Bank of England’s independence. The Government must take responsibility by publishing OBR forecasts and windfall profit estimates, and introduce a proper windfall tax.
Welcomes recent employment statistics but questions whether it is justifiable to place blame for the current economic crisis solely on the Government's actions.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
Agrees with the motion and criticises the lack of disagreement from Conservative Members, suggesting they recognise their responsibility for the current situation.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Supports the need to help small businesses survive through high energy bills and emphasises the importance of economic growth for job creation.
Questions Labour's stance on protecting pensioners and welcomes the Prime Minister’s confirmation that the triple lock will be protected.
Stephen Timms
Lab
East Ham
Asks for clarification regarding the decision to sack the permanent secretary to the Treasury, suggesting it was due to warnings about economic policies' consequences.
James Cartlidge
Con
South Suffolk
Questions whether Labour's windfall tax policy would be paid for by borrowing and seeks clarification on their stance.
Rushanara Ali
Lab
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Agrees that the Government has failed to learn from their mistakes, with energy companies profiting while citizens suffer. Urges the Government to prioritise using company profits instead of cutting public services.
Anna McMorrin
Lab
Cardiff North
Emphasises the dire consequences for health and social welfare due to high inflation and energy costs, questioning why companies are not contributing their fair share.
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Highlights the undermining of local government projects such as leisure centres due to the economic outlook following the mini-Budget, urging the Government to support these initiatives despite inflation challenges.
Andrew Griffith
Con
Arundel and South Downs
The economy faces challenges due to global trends including the pandemic and Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Government is committed to fiscal discipline and prioritising growth, implementing measures like cutting national insurance, energy price guarantee, and investment zones.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
The current issues in the global markets are caused by Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. The Government is addressing economic challenges while considering broader context.
Meg Hillier
Lab Co-op
Hackney South and Shoreditch
The mini-Budget has led to chaos in the financial markets, causing instability for pension funds and retired people across the country. The Government needs to address these issues.
The Bank of England had to intervene after a collapse in UK Government bond markets following the mini-Budget. The value of BT’s pension scheme has plummeted by £11 billion. The Minister must acknowledge and address this chaos.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
The new Prime Minister and Chancellor had to tread carefully due to global factors, but their actions have been reckless and damaging given the dangerous situation.
Several hon. Members
13:14:00
No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.
Rosie Winterton
13:14:00
Colleagues will be aware that there is a great deal of interest in this debate, so I warn the next speakers that, after the SNP spokesperson, I will introduce a six-minute time limit. I call the SNP spokesperson, Drew Hendry.
Drew Hendry
SNP
Inverness Nairn Badenoch and Strathspey
The report shows that 60% of people across the nations of the UK are worried about their household financial prospects. Drew Hendry emphasises that nine in ten people have delayed putting on heating due to cost concerns. He criticises the current government for focusing on making the rich richer and cutting benefits like Universal Credit, which hurts vulnerable households. The Chancellor's decision to remove the cap on energy prices is seen as exacerbating an already dire situation, especially for those off the gas grid in rural areas.
James Cartlidge
Con
South Suffolk
Asked Drew Hendry about SNP policy regarding Scotland's currency and lender of last resort if it becomes independent. Asked a follow-up question but was not given way to by the speaker.
Brendan O'Hara
SNP
Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber
Noted that heating oil prices have increased by 147% since January and expressed concern for rural areas where residents might not be able to afford to refill their oil tanks. This is a crisis.
Imran Hussain
Lab
Bradford East
Asked the government minister about figures on expected windfall revenue, highlighting that the government always sides with energy giants over ordinary people.
Inquired whether there is any indication of how growth will be spread beyond London and the south-east. Criticised for not addressing this concern sufficiently in his speech.
Alan Brown
SNP
Kilmarnock and Loudoun
Highlighted that fuel poverty has increased by more than 50% under the current government, affecting 6.7 million households, which contradicts their claim of protecting the vulnerable.
William Wragg
Con
Hazel Grove
Expressed concerns over the recent mini-Budget and its impact on public confidence. Criticised the lack of foresight by senior Government members, emphasising the importance of sound financial management and a balanced budget. Stated his personal struggles with mental health but highlighted that delivering a speech in Parliament was not one of them. Emphasised the need for better communication from the Treasury regarding independent organisations' reputations. Vowed to support the Government's position on fracking despite personal opposition, citing the importance of maintaining positions within parliamentary committees and the 1922 Committee.
Asked a point of order regarding the validity of a Member expressing disagreement with policy but voting in support. This was not considered a formal point of order by the Deputy Speaker.
Responded to Geraint Davies, stating that each member is accountable for their own decisions and should not expect interference from the Deputy Speaker regarding voting choices.
Stephen Timms
Lab
East Ham
Praised William Wragg's speech and highlighted economic issues such as food bank dependency, real-term cuts in benefits, and the disparity between inflation rates and benefit increases. Emphasised the importance of upholding promises made to the poorest families during cost-of-living crises. Criticised previous policies that led to increased reliance on social safety nets like food banks and urged for a more compassionate approach towards vulnerable populations facing rising living costs.
Steve Double
Con
St Austell and Newquay
The speaker criticises the rushed mini-Budget, stating it has led to a loss of confidence in markets and businesses. He welcomes the new Chancellor's steps towards stability but emphasises the need for clear policies from both No.10 and No.11. He supports maintaining the triple lock on pensions but urges caution with stamp duty cuts as they may exacerbate housing crises, particularly in areas like Cornwall.
Paula Barker
Lab
Liverpool Wavertree
The speaker condemns the Government for the economic instability caused by the mini-Budget and criticises austerity measures. She highlights the negative impact on communities such as Liverpool, including increased mortgage bills and uncertainty for small businesses. The speech emphasises the need for public services to be adequately funded and stresses that working people are being asked to bear the brunt of stabilising the market.
Jerome Mayhew
Con
Broadland and Fakenham
The Government's intervention during the pandemic prevented a catastrophic rise in unemployment, despite spending £630 billion. This prudence contrasts with Labour's historical track record of worsening unemployment and economic conditions. The current low unemployment rate and productivity growth indicate successful economic policies under this Government.
Mike Amesbury
Lab
Weaver Vale
The economic crisis is the result of irresponsible policy decisions by the current Government, leading to high inflation and increased costs for basic necessities. The mini-Budget exacerbated these issues, causing a spike in mortgage rates and energy bills while wages stagnate or decline. The frequent changes in Chancellor demonstrate a lack of stability and effective leadership.
James Cartlidge
Con
South Suffolk
The Conservative MP emphasises the importance of sound fiscal policy and warns against unfunded tax cuts or spending measures, arguing that they have a significant impact on future generations. He criticises the lack of funding for such measures and the absence of difficult decisions in addressing economic issues. Cartlidge highlights the need to balance the books and ensure that any measures taken are financially sustainable. He also discusses the social care workforce and the importance of maintaining commitments made by previous governments, particularly regarding the health and social care levy.
Hannah Bardell
SNP
Livingston
Intervening to criticise the Conservative government for creating economic black holes in Scotland, which her Government has to address. She describes it as a 'trickle-down tragedy' affecting constituents and calls into question the effectiveness of trickle-down economics promoted by the current administration.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
Mr. Perkins expresses his opposition towards Tory governments, especially the current one, which he finds inept and arrogant, leading to significant impacts on people's lives due to higher interest rates, tax rises, service cuts, and potential further reductions in benefits for disabled people and pensioners. He supports a windfall tax on energy generators' excess profits to fund support measures during winter and criticises the government’s lack of clarity and consistency in their economic policies.
Janet Daby
Lab
Lewisham East
Ms. Daby interjects, agreeing with Mr. Perkins that the Prime Minister should take responsibility for her actions by resigning since she is the one who set the course and ensured the Chancellor lost his job.
Paula Barker
Lab
Liverpool Wavertree
Ms. Barker agrees with Mr. Perkins that it is time for a windfall tax as even the CEO of Shell has advocated for one, indicating that such measures are necessary to address current economic challenges.
James Wild
Con
North West Norfolk
The debate highlights the economic stability and growth achieved by Conservative Governments over the past decade, despite criticisms from opposition parties. Unemployment is at a record low, with high levels of foreign direct investment in the UK. The energy profits levy will generate £26 billion to support citizens facing cost-of-living pressures. Investment in new hospital schemes is essential for addressing health infrastructure needs.
Southgate and Wood Green
The former Chancellor's 'mini-Budget' was a disaster, leading to financial market panic due to uncosted tax cuts and promises of more reductions without OBR costing. This crisis, caused by the Government’s ideology, will be paid for by working people with higher mortgages and borrowing costs. In Enfield, Southgate, many are cutting back on essential groceries and worried about energy bills. The Prime Minister's broken promise of no public spending cuts further exacerbates existing issues in public services. The UK's international reputation has been damaged, and the economic credibility ruined.
Paul Bristow
Con
Peterborough
Economic growth is a good thing, but there are challenges. Paul highlights low pay as the first challenge and emphasises the need for investment in R&D and retraining to create high-skilled jobs. He mentions Peterborough's new university focusing on manufacturing and engineering and the levelling-up fund investment. The second challenge is tax: while he recognises public spending commitments, he asserts that economic growth can address higher taxes over time. Lastly, he stresses the importance of positivity in promoting business and entrepreneurship for future prosperity.
Sarah Olney
Lib Dem
Richmond Park
Criticises the Conservative Government's lack of a real plan for growth after the mini-budget crisis. She points out that the UK economy is facing tough market conditions, exacerbated by the Government's policies which have led to financial instability and higher borrowing costs for small businesses. Olney argues for a focus on tackling labour shortages through investment in youth and skills development, driving green investments, and rebuilding trade post-Brexit. She highlights the need for benefits to be increased with inflation and criticises the failure to tax excess profits from oil and gas companies.
Tahir Ali
Lab
Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
The Government's economic plan has led to a severe downturn, with high inflation at 10.1%, rising energy prices, and unsustainable property costs. In Birmingham, Hall Green, child poverty is exceptionally high at 52.9% and food bank assistance for children reaches alarming levels. The unemployment rate stands at 11.4%. Private companies like Royal Mail have profited while public services suffer from underinvestment. The Labour Party argues that this situation reflects a moral crisis driven by greed.
Janet Daby
Lab
Lewisham East
The Government's economic mismanagement has resulted in increased food bank dependency and child poverty, with many self-employed individuals suffering during the pandemic. The recent mini-Budget led to a financial crisis, impacting mortgage rates and rents. Constituents face rising costs for essentials like rent and utilities. Labour proposes solutions including a national energy company to lower bills, boost job security, promote fair pay, and address gender and ethnic minority pay gaps.
Matt Rodda
Lab
Reading Central
The recent economic turmoil caused by the Government is unprecedented and has severely affected families and businesses. The impact includes increased mortgage costs, empty shops due to business closures, and worsening food bank usage in Reading and Woodley. There is a need for new leadership to address these issues effectively.
Sam Tarry
Lab
Ilford South
The Government's economic policies have plunged the UK into a significant crisis, pushing many households below the poverty line and straining public services. The Chancellor is expected to introduce further austerity measures which will disproportionately affect working-class people. There is a call for strategic long-term investment in the economy instead of austerity cuts. Energy giants are set to make huge profits during this crisis, while ordinary households struggle to pay bills. A single publicly owned energy company should be considered to ensure affordability and accountability.
Beth Winter
Lab
Cynon Valley
The cost of living crisis in Wales is worsening with nearly 90% of surveyed constituents feeling worse off than a year ago, many planning significant cuts to heating. The mini-Budget caused economic chaos and ideological tax handouts for the wealthy. The Chancellor's agenda of public spending cuts is an attack on working-class people’s living standards. There is a need for fair funding in Wales and inflation-proofed pay rises for public sector workers. Wealth must be better distributed, and taxation shifted towards those who can afford it. Trade unions are organising coordinated action over pay and terms.
Pat McFadden
Lab
Wolverhampton South East
The Opposition has expressed significant concerns over the impact of recent economic policies. The debate saw a sharp critique of the mini-Budget and its aftermath, emphasising how it led to a run on the pound, increased gilt yields, emergency interventions from the Bank of England, and higher mortgage rates. McFadden underscores that these issues were self-inflicted rather than due to external factors. He also criticises the Prime Minister’s ideological stance and her handling of the crisis.
James Cartlidge
Con
South Suffolk
Cartlidge questioned Labour's plans for funding energy support, suggesting that it would primarily rely on borrowing despite promises to utilise windfall taxes. This intervention aims to highlight inconsistencies in Labour’s economic proposals.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
Perkins asserts that the Prime Minister's current leadership is merely a temporary phase until the Conservative Party can find an excuse to remove her, indicating deep dissatisfaction with the political direction and handling of recent economic issues.
Edward Argar
Con
Melton and Syston
Closes the debate on behalf of the Government, highlighting economic stability as crucial for the wellbeing of constituents. Acknowledges that decisions may be difficult but necessary for sustainable growth. Emphasises the importance of prioritising the needs of the most vulnerable and cutting taxes sustainably to support further economic growth.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Welcomes the Minister's pragmatism, calling for good, old-fashioned Tory pragmatism and common sense to be at the helm of Government policy.
Pat McFadden
Lab
Wolverhampton South East
Raises a point of order regarding the motion passed by the House calling on the Government to publish Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts and estimates of windfall profits from energy producers immediately.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.