← Back to House of Commons Debates
The Counsellors of State Bill - Clause 1
01 December 2022
Lead MP
Alex Burghart
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 2
At a Glance
Alex Burghart raised concerns about the counsellors of state bill - clause 1 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key Requests to Government:
Bill passed without amendment
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
This clause provides for the Earl of Wessex and Princess Royal to serve as Counsellors of State during their lifetimes, subject to provisos set out in the 1937 Act. The purpose is to ensure that royal functions can be delegated properly when required, maintaining the continuity of the monarchy's role in governance. This Bill reflects the enduring importance of the monarchy and its adaptation to modern times while preserving constitutional traditions.
Angela Rayner
Lab
Ashton-under-Lyne
The House recognised the affection for the royals and their contributions. The swift passage of this Bill demonstrates that when there is consensus, Parliament can act swiftly and responsibly.
Brendan O'Hara
SNP
Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber
Acknowledged the speed and unanimity of the Bill's passage. Provided a brief historical correction on when the kingdom began, emphasising the importance of accurate information in debates.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.