← Back to House of Commons Debates
Power of Attorney (Amendment) Bill - Clause 1
09 December 2022
Lead MP
Stephen Metcalfe
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
Crime & Law EnforcementBrexitMental Health
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Stephen Metcalfe raised concerns about power of attorney (amendment) bill - clause 1 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Mr. Stephen Metcalfe proposes to move the Power of Attorney (Amendment) Bill, which aims to reform the process for making and registering lasting powers of attorney (LPAs). He outlines the need for LPAs due to increasing dementia cases and the protection against fraud and abuse. The bill introduces two key changes: modernising the registration process by introducing digital channels and expanding the certification scope to include chartered legal executives. Mr. Metcalfe highlights current issues with paper-based processes, high backlogs, and difficulties in understanding complex guidance, proposing a more streamlined system that includes identity verification and automated checks.
Peter Gibson
Con
Darlington
Mr. Peter Gibson emphasises the importance of enduring powers of attorney and highlights the necessity for people to register them when capacity is lost, clarifying that many mistakenly believe there are no steps required once an enduring power of attorney is in place.
James Sunderland
Lab
Hastings and Rye
Mr. James Sunderland acknowledges the importance of better safeguards for financial and property issues, protection against loss of mental capacity, and abuse of power as proposed by the bill. He also questions whether the cost will be reduced with the inclusion of chartered legal executives.
Alex Cunningham
Lab
Stocksbridge Penistone
Cunningham supports the bill's aim to modernise LPAs, stressing the need for technology to enhance donor protection. He highlights ongoing issues with the Office of the Public Guardian and welcomes measures that strengthen protections but questions why some Law Society recommendations were omitted from the Bill.
Scunthorpe
Mumby-Croft thanks her colleague for bringing forward this important private Member’s Bill and expresses support based on her personal experience with LPAs. She emphasises the importance of modernising the system to ensure easier access, particularly for those suffering from conditions like dementia.
Jerome Mayhew
Con
Broadland and Fakenham
Mayhew supports the Bill, citing his experience as a barrister attorney who found the current system complex. He welcomes provisions to make LPAs easier through digital means while ensuring a paper alternative remains available, highlighting increased protections from abuse.
Peter Gibson
Con
Richmond Park
Gibson, as a solicitor with extensive experience in LPAs, welcomes the Bill’s measures to update the preparation process and streamlining for clients. He emphasises the importance of legal professionals in assisting with LPA preparation while noting that it may not be essential.
Danny Kruger
Reform
East Wiltshire
Kruger expresses support for the Bill, drawing attention to the significance of LPAs and the potential dangers of elder abuse. He raises concerns about moving towards a paperless society but appreciates the measures in the Bill.
Mike Freer
Con
Horsham
Mr. Freer supported the Bill, emphasising its importance in addressing an ageing population with a rising number of people needing LPAs due to conditions like dementia. He highlighted that preparing early for loss of capacity is crucial and praised the Bill's proposals to make LPA registration safer, simpler, and more accessible through digital means while maintaining paper options. He also mentioned the Government's consultation on potential solutions.
Stephen Metcalfe
Con
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Mr. Metcalfe reiterated his support for the Bill, summarizing its key objectives such as improving access through digital channels while retaining paper options, implementing identity checks to prevent fraud, simplifying objection processes, streamlining application procedures, and enhancing the role of chartered legal executives.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.