← Back to House of Commons Debates
Social Housing (Regulation) Bill
07 November 2022
Lead MP
Michael Gove
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
Housing
Other Contributors: 20
At a Glance
Michael Gove raised concerns about social housing (regulation) bill in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves the Social Housing (Regulation) Bill for Second Reading. Acknowledges the tragedy at Grenfell and outlines steps taken by the Government, including legislation like the Fire Safety Act 2021 and the Building Safety Act 2022 to improve building safety. Emphasises the importance of personal evacuation plans for disabled individuals living in high-rise blocks.
Florence Eshalomi
Lab Co-op
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Welcomes Michael Gove back to his position but expresses concern over the lack of personal evacuation plans for disabled people despite previous promises.
Praises Michael Gove for his work on converting the Social Housing White Paper into legislation and asks if it aligns with treating social housing tenants with respect, removing stigma associated with such tenure.
Battersea
Reiterates Florence Eshalomi's point about personal evacuation plans for disabled people and asks if the Secretary of State supports their implementation.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Raises concern over financial penalties that may punish tenants twice, once for having a bad landlord and again through withheld funds, citing an example from his constituency.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Welcomes Michael Gove back to his position and asks if information about better safety can be shared with other regions including Northern Ireland, which has some high-rise apartment blocks.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Asks whether Michael Gove would regard a complacent attitude towards fire safety by a housing association as very serious, post-Grenfell tragedy.
Lisa Nandy
Lab
Wigan
Supports the Bill but calls for improvements to ensure tenants are at the centre of an advisory panel, further professionalising standards in the social housing workforce, and ensuring the regulator has adequate resources. Criticises the lack of action on building more social homes despite promises made.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Intervened to emphasise that the biggest problem with social housing is a lack of investment and under-supply, leading to desperate measures such as selling off properties. Calls for restoring social housing's pre-eminence.
Theresa May
Con
Walton
Welcomes the Bill's introduction but calls for stronger measures in professionalising the social housing sector. Argues that requiring qualifications would ensure better attitudes towards tenants and improve management standards, reducing stigma associated with living in social housing.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Intervenes to support Theresa May's argument about professionalising the sector. Emphasises that attitude is key, alongside qualifications, for better management of social housing.
Helen Hayes
Lab
Dulwich and West Norwood
The amendment aims to protect secure social housing tenants from threats of violence by ensuring their tenancy rights are maintained when they need to move. It also seeks to prevent families from entering an overwhelmed social housing waiting list unnecessarily.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Mr Francois supports the Bill to improve regulation of social housing. He cites his personal experience growing up in council housing and mentions examples from his constituency where housing associations such as Morgan Sindall have provided poor maintenance services, leading to numerous tenant complaints about delayed repairs during the pandemic. He also criticises Notting Hill Genesis for its management practices, including fire safety concerns at Sangster Court sheltered housing unit. Francois argues that a tougher regulator is needed to hold these organisations accountable and improve service quality.
Mr Marco Longhi supported the Bill on behalf of his social housing tenants in Dudley. He acknowledged the hard work of previous Ministers and stated that high standards of service, safety, and respect are crucial for constituents. He cited an example of long delays in repairs affecting a constituent's child's safety, indicating that while not all landlords or officers perform poorly, many need support to meet their obligations efficiently. Longhi argued for necessary state intervention to ensure social landlords comply with performance improvement plans and maintain high standards.
Battersea
Ms. De Cordova highlighted that many social housing tenants in her constituency face substandard conditions and poor customer service, leading to significant challenges for their mental health and well-being. She cited a constituent who spent over two years trying to get repair work done on his home, underscoring the need for better regulation of the sector. She also emphasised the importance of trained staff and adequate inspections by the regulator to ensure compliance with legal requirements. Ms. De Cordova called for more detail on how the new inspection regime will be delivered and committed resources to support it.
Helen Morgan
Lib Dem
North Shropshire
Welcomed the Secretary of State and broadly supported the Bill, highlighting the tireless campaigning following the Grenfell tragedy. Raised concerns about the delay in introducing the Bill despite the urgent need for improvements in social housing rights. Emphasised the financial pressures on local authorities exacerbated by inflation and high interest rates, calling for clarity on funding delivery. Urged the Minister to find ways to fill the funding gap for councils to protect vulnerable people. Quoted research showing every pound invested in new social homes generates £2.84 in wider economy and saves £780 a year in housing benefit. Questioned why houses bought under right-to-buy are often let into private rented sector, urging retention of 100% proceeds for maintaining social housing stock. Criticised the abandonment of zero-carbon homes policy leading to inefficient home construction. Called for provisions on retrofitting with insulation and energy efficiency in newly built social housing. Advocated ending no-fault evictions and urgent cladding removal.
Salford
Rebecca Long-Bailey broadly supports the Bill but believes it is too narrow to address social housing crises. She argues for an amendment that would make social housing providers subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, noting that six out of 23 social housing providers in Greater Manchester refused freedom of information requests. She raises concerns about funding and proposes routine inspections but highlights a lack of detail on delivery and funding. Long-Bailey also discusses the tragic death of Awaab Ishak due to poor living conditions and criticises the absence of Government action towards national mission for decent homes.
Mitcham and Morden
Welcomes the Bill, stating it is long overdue due to previous government policies that damaged social housing. Mentions a case in her constituency where disrepair caused serious health issues for a tenant's father. Describes the current bureaucratic process as frustrating and ineffective for tenants facing urgent repairs. Emphasises the need for a strengthened regulator with sufficient resources to effectively inspect properties.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon supports the Bill and acknowledges its importance, citing the Grenfell tragedy as a catalyst for change. He highlights a social housing crisis in Northern Ireland, including shortages of suitable and affordable homes. He mentions that around 650 units of temporary accommodation were acquired to meet demand, with approximately 117,000 live housing benefit claims in Northern Ireland by March 2021. Shannon expresses concern about landlords selling rental properties, leading to potential rent increases and a lack of affordable housing for low-income individuals or families.
Greenwich and Woolwich
Welcomes the Bill but seeks to further strengthen it, particularly in consumer regulations, advisory panel composition, professional training qualifications, enforcement powers, inspection frequency, resourcing of the regulator, social housing supply. Argues for more robust measures to protect tenants' health and safety.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Intervened briefly, congratulating the Minister for her summing up. Suggested a need for a snappier name for the social housing regulator to instill fear into complacent chief executives.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.