Explained the differences between Report and Third Reading stages of the bill debate. Emphasised that Report stage allows for specific amendments to be discussed, while Third Reading focuses on passing or rejecting the entire bill.

Commended the hon. Member for Mole Valley's private member’s Bill but criticised Sir Christopher Chope’s amendments, arguing that they miss the point of protecting vulnerable people from sex offenders in local government roles.

Defended his stance on previous legislation and argued against the Opposition's position, insisting that he supports such measures being debated properly in Parliament.

Supported the principles of the Bill but opposed Sir Christopher Chope’s amendments due to their impact on individuals' ability to be rehabilitated and serve in public office, emphasising the need for safeguarding measures.

Beresford opposes the proposed amendments, arguing that they are not appropriate for this Bill and would have a draconian effect on local government. He notes that these new clauses are retrospective and do not consider the nature or time of the conviction. Beresford raises concerns about the potential impact on hard-working councillors who may be disqualified due to minor offences from decades ago, leading to forced by-elections and partisan trawling for past convictions. He believes that such measures undermine the primary aim of protecting children.

Intervened to ask about the application of the provision to individuals who stand as police and crime commissioners despite having a conviction that should disqualify them, specifically mentioning an elected individual in Wiltshire. Indicates concern over criminal proceedings against such candidates.

Mr. Chope argued that his new clauses would prevent individuals convicted of certain offences from serving as councillors, aligning with the Government's commitment to reducing illegal drug use and public harm.

Mr. Beresford supported the Bill by highlighting its importance in ensuring that sex offenders who avoid custodial sentences are also disqualified from local government positions, emphasising it as a necessary safeguard for public trust.

Ms. Hunt agreed with the Bill, stressing that those convicted of sexual offences should not be in positions of influence over vulnerable people and aligning it with Nolan principles.

Ms. Owen supported the Bill, highlighting its importance for public trust and the need to ensure that elected representatives are fit and proper to serve vulnerable constituents.

The Bill will apply to individuals on the sex offenders register and local authorities. It is necessary due to a loophole allowing councillors convicted of sexual offences but avoiding custodial sentences to remain in office. The speaker welcomes support from the Local Government Association and calls for the Bill's implementation across the UK.

Supports clause 1, which inserts a new section into the Local Government Act. The speaker emphasises that people who commit sexual offences should be disqualified from holding positions in local government and highlights the Bill's alignment with Nolan principles.

Welcomes the closure of loopholes but suggests bringing together devolved administrations to look at disqualifications more broadly, including for MPs and police and crime commissioners. Proposes a universal element to disqualifications across the UK.

Pays tribute to those who put themselves forward for elected office and highlights the importance of local government in protecting vulnerable groups. Emphasises that the Bill will protect the public, especially the most vulnerable.

The Minister supports the Bill, emphasising its importance in restoring public faith in local democracy. It updates disqualification criteria to prevent sex offenders from holding elected positions. She highlights the support from various constituencies and mentions that similar provisions have been implemented in Wales through the Local Government and Elections (Wales) Act 2021.

The MP expresses gratitude for the support received from across the House, including his hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch and the Minister. He emphasises the need to update disqualification criteria to align with modern sentencing practices.