The shadow Foreign Secretary expressed condolences for those killed and praised Poland’s cautious response. He questioned the Government on their strategy to strengthen global opposition against Russia, especially among nations in the Global South.

Welcomes the Foreign Secretary’s remarks about strategic endurance and asks for assurance that appropriate representations have been made to the Chancellor and Prime Minister regarding defence investment.

Commends the Foreign Secretary's statement and expresses solidarity with Poland. Questions whether further air support is needed and if a no-fly zone should be considered.

Asks if the Foreign Secretary agrees with him that Article 5 of the NATO treaty is still relevant.

Questions about the role of international bodies in trying to bring about an end to the conflict.

Offers condolences to Poland, questions about continued support for Ukraine’s infrastructure defence.

Discusses measures for punishing Putin and his cronies, mentions the Home Office's report on the visa scheme.

In the context of a missile incident in Poland, can the Foreign Secretary use this opportunity to reinforce to allies that Russia is not only at war with Ukraine but also at war with them?

Does Russia's use of energy as a weapon mean we must avoid being reliant on fossil-fuel autocrats and instead focus on clean, secure homegrown energy?

Despite the UK's efforts in providing military aid, do the Ukrainians have enough air defence equipment to protect themselves?

What steps have the Government taken to establish contact with Russian counterparts after learning of the incident in Poland?

Will the country continue to provide Ukrainians with air defence systems like Thales' lightweight multi-role missile?

How is the Foreign Secretary working with allies to prevent Russia's attempts to rebuild its espionage network?

Can the Foreign Secretary update the House on conversations at the G20 regarding Russia's withdrawal from Ukraine?

Does the Foreign Secretary agree that Russia is entirely responsible for any deaths resulting from the incident in Poland?

Will efforts to provide food and humanitarian aid to Ukraine be redoubled? Will energy equipment and infrastructure repair support also continue?

The Foreign Secretary is absolutely right to be led by the facts, and hopefully those facts will become clearer, given reports that a NATO E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control system was on station at the time. One thing is clear now: that Putin’s evil regime is targeting the civilian infrastructure in Ukraine. My right hon. Friend has just described the support we are giving to maintain lighting and heating systems. Will he emphasise once again that we are giving that aid so that the brave Ukrainian people have the lighting, the heating and the food they need, especially as winter approaches?

On Friday night, I and a small group of my friends made the 2,000-mile trip to Ukraine. We crossed the Polish border and the Ukrainian border, then entered Lviv to deliver much-needed humanitarian aid to suffering families. That was not the only precious cargo on board, because we took with us, after 222 days of their living with my family, the mother and little boy who have been living at home with me in North Norfolk, and reunited them, together, in what were the most remarkable, humbling and emotional scenes I will probably ever see. Of the aid delivered, the generators that the people of North Norfolk were able to get on to the van were incredibly well received. Those generators are not available in Poland any more, so may we have some sort of national push to try to get generators to the people of Ukraine? To bring it home, Secretary of State, last night the father of the little boy whom my wife and family are looking after spent the night in Lviv after missile strikes with no energy, no water and no heating. This is affecting civilians and people I can now proudly say are part of my family.