← Back to House of Commons Debates
Service Family Accommodation
20 December 2022
Lead MP
Alex Chalk
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
DefenceHousingEmploymentForeign AffairsEnergy
Other Contributors: 16
At a Glance
Alex Chalk raised concerns about service family accommodation in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
The provision of safe, good quality and well-maintained accommodation is essential for the armed forces' operational output, recruitment, retention, and morale. The Ministry of Defence aims to ensure that over 96% of its service family accommodation meets or exceeds the Government’s Decent Homes Standard. However, issues like lack of heating and hot water are unacceptable. Contractors have legal and moral duties to resolve such problems within two hours for emergencies and within 48 hours for urgent cases. Since concerns were raised earlier this year, rectification plans were initiated, including improving access to temporary heaters (1,500 additional units) and increasing use of temporary accommodation. Compensation is also being provided for increased energy costs due to the use of temporary heaters.
Dan Jarvis
Lab
Barnsley North
Question
The MP expresses concern about the volume of accommodation concerns during freezing weather and highlights specific issues like black mould and broken boilers. He questions the lack of reasonable ways to report problems, the Secretary of State’s meetings with contractors, a plan for MOD intervention, support over Christmas holidays, and current standards.
Minister reply
The Minister acknowledges the seriousness of these issues and confirms that rectification plans have been in place since September, reducing the backlog from 4,200 to around 3,100. £350 million has been allocated for maintenance above the usual £176 million annual sum, with a decrease in non-habitable failures for personnel moving into properties. There is an assurance that no one will move into properties with mould and alternative accommodation should be provided if necessary.
Tobias Ellwood
Con
Bolton West
Question
I am concerned about the current state of accommodation for armed forces personnel, particularly in relation to heating and boilers not working. I ask what will be done during the upcoming integrated review to address this issue.
Minister reply
The right hon. Gentleman is correct that this affects retention in the armed forces. £350 million has been allocated over two years for improvements. However, contractors like Pinnacle, Amey and VIVO failed to anticipate issues with their IT systems, leading to missed maintenance appointments.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Question
Can the Minister guarantee that no service personnel or their families will be without heating or hot water this winter? How many homes are currently without these essentials?
Minister reply
The hon. Gentleman is correct; contractors are not meeting key performance indicators and value for money is lacking due to missed maintenance appointments. £350 million has been allocated for improvements, including thermal efficiency measures.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Question
In a 2020 report titled “Stick or Twist?”, poor accommodation was cited as one of the major factors in service personnel leaving. The Future Defence Infrastructure Services contract, however, was proceeded with despite these warnings.
Minister reply
My right hon. Friend is correct; there will be a long look at FDIS and lessons from entering into such contracts.
Dave Doogan
SNP
Angus and Perthshire Glens
Question
How can the Minister defend the poor conditions in service family accommodation? Is this failure due to a lack of funding, DIO incompetence, or contractor failure?
Minister reply
The MOD is putting additional funds into maintenance issues. The £350 million allocated addresses these concerns. Questions are being asked about how this contract was entered and who knew what.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
What consequences will follow if satisfaction is not forthcoming, and can the Government discontinue the current contract?
Minister reply
There are clauses in the contract allowing for financial remedies from 23 January. Other legal options may be considered if the breach becomes severe.
Kevan Jones
Lab/Co-op
Barnsley Central
Question
HMS Raleigh; the Commando Training Centre Royal Marines, Lympstone; HMS Sultan; HMS Collingwood; RAF Cranwell; RAF Halton; Catterick garrison; RAF Cosford and Stonehouse barracks are just nine armed forces sites that have contacted me about problems with hot water and heating. Many of those sites deal with initial basic training. What message does it send to young people and potential recruits if we cannot provide the basics of heating and hot water?
Minister reply
The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right: that is not good enough. The majority—indeed, the large majority—of properties have experienced problems for less than 24 hours, but it should not happen at all. We are indignant and frustrated about contractors not meeting their requirements. From now on, we will take every proper and legal step to hold them to account.
Jane Stevenson
Con
Hastings and Rye
Question
Like many on both sides of this Chamber, I have had the privilege of spending time with the armed forces parliamentary scheme. Families' experience and expectation of being the partner of a service personnel are crucial for retention. How long will he give Pinnacle to pull its socks up or make significant change?
Minister reply
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Potential financial consequences can follow from 23 January if things have not improved, I am receiving daily dashboards about the situation and expect improvements every single day.
Honiton and Sidmouth
Question
When service personnel in service families accommodation are away, their spouse has to take charge of property maintenance. Last year, 16,250 armed forces personnel left the armed forces—the largest number since 2016. What account did the Government take of retention of service personnel when they awarded the contract to Pinnacle Group in April?
Minister reply
Issues of recruitment and retention are multifactorial but the hon. Gentleman raises a fair point. It was made crystal clear that Pinnacle had to deliver on it, because otherwise the implications for service families would be deeply profound.
Meg Hillier
Lab/Co-op
Hackney South and Shoreditch
Question
The Public Accounts Committee has issued two reports on this—one in 2016 and one in 2021—and there is also the excellent report by the right hon. Member for Rayleigh and Wickford, which highlighted the same issues. What is the Minister going to do to make sure that there is a real difference? Will he undertake a root-and-branch review of how the Ministry of Defence contracts for these services?
Minister reply
There are two issues: first, the overall quality of stock needs improvement. The £350 million will principally direct at 20% accommodation that requires most support. Secondly, I am keen to get to the bottom of ensuring that DIO does its due diligence on contracts and make sure that we end up with something that will deliver.
Question
Halifax is home to many armed forces families and has a long association with the Duke of Wellington’s Regiment in particular. Service families have made more than 9,000 complaints about the state of their service accommodation since the start of last year, largely relating to maintenance concerns. What are the consequences for those contractors where he finds such failure in meeting those service standards?
Minister reply
Built within the contract is an understanding that should contractors fail to meet acceptable levels of performance (ALP), financial penalties can follow. Under normal English law, if there is a repudiatory breach, it can lead to consequences for the company.
Question
I thank the Minister for his strong response to the question. Many families are deeply concerned by the lack of action to tackle black mould in these homes and the serious effect it could have on their children’s health. What assurances can the Minister offer military families with children that they will not have to live in dangerous conditions?
Minister reply
The position is that if mould is found in a property before service family enters, they will not enter it. There is now a dedicated helpline for people to report it which leads to professional survey and remedial action.
Question
After the death of Awaab Ishak, the Secretary of State said that it should never have happened and that it was a basic responsibility of local authority or housing association. There have been thousands of complaints since 2021 over problems of mould and leaking ceilings in homes of service personnel. Should not the Secretary of State for Defence accept same basic responsibility?
Minister reply
I agree more needs to be done regarding mould. DIO has set up an improvement team of 30 people ensuring that MOD will do everything it can to ensure Amey, VIVO and Pinnacle have nowhere to hide by blaming other people.
Navendu Mishra
Lab
Stockport
Question
This is an extremely important issue, and I place on record my thanks to my hon. Friend the Member for Barnsley Central (Dan Jarvis) for securing this urgent question. I was lucky enough last year to complete the Royal Air Force segment of the armed forces parliamentary scheme, and I visited several bases in the UK and abroad and saw the standard of accommodation that some service families have to live in, and it is simply not acceptable. Will the Minister give the House a precise figure for service family properties that have cases of mould and damp?
Minister reply
I will write to the hon. Gentleman with a precise number, but the central point is this: any member of the armed forces, be they in the RAF—the Navy or the Army—should, if they discover mould in their service family accommodation, call the national hotline, and that should trigger the remedial action that I have indicated, with a surveyor going in. If the issue cannot be sorted within a reasonable period of time, they should then be re-accommodated.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
I thank the Minister for his firm and helpful response to the urgent question. I have an Army base just a couple of miles from my constituency, and I believe it can be of use to help people, whether that is temporary accommodation or a complete refit for affordable housing. To see these sites lying vacant seems so wrong when there is so much need. Will the Minister outline what discussions have taken place referencing accommodation in Northern Ireland so that vacant properties are not left to fall into even deeper disrepair?
Minister reply
The hon. Gentleman raises an important point. It is not just Northern Ireland; other people have got in touch to say, ‘There seems to be this vacant accommodation.’ There is a lot of movement around the country, as he will appreciate, and the MOD needs to keep significant headroom in available accommodation. The central point is that that should not be a mechanism by which properties can fall into disrepair. He makes precisely that point, and that is why the £350 million over and above the annual maintenance cost is so important.
Shadow Comment
Dan Jarvis
Shadow Comment
The shadow minister agrees on the importance of supporting armed forces families but highlights serious issues with current service family accommodation, including black mould causing viral infections and broken boilers in sub-zero temperatures. He calls for urgent action to alleviate these problems today, updates on recent meetings between MOD and contractors, a plan for MOD intervention to prioritise repairs, and support over the Christmas holidays.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.