← Back to House of Commons Debates
Universal Jurisdiction (Extension)
25 April 2023
Lead MP
Brendan O'Hara
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Brendan O'Hara raised concerns about universal jurisdiction (extension) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The Universal Jurisdiction (Extension) Bill would tighten existing legislation on bringing to justice those responsible for the world’s most heinous crimes. It aims to amend the International Criminal Court Act 2001 so that UK courts can prosecute genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity regardless of where they were committed or the nationality or location of perpetrators or victims. The bill seeks to address loopholes in current law which limit jurisdiction to cases involving UK nationals or residents.
Brendan O'Hara
SNP
Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber
The Bill aims to strengthen the UK’s ability to prosecute international crimes of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. It addresses current limitations that require a connection between the accused or victims to the UK. The bill would ensure no hiding place for those responsible for such grave crimes worldwide.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.