← Back to House of Commons Debates
Omagh Bombing
02 February 2023
Lead MP
Chris Heaton-Harris
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
Northern Ireland
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Chris Heaton-Harris raised concerns about omagh bombing in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Mr Heaton-Harris announced his intention to establish an independent statutory inquiry into the Omagh bombing of 1998, which killed 29 people and injured over 200. The decision was taken following careful consideration of previous investigations, the findings of a Northern Ireland High Court judgment in October 2021, and the United Kingdom’s obligations under article 2 of the European convention on human rights.
Daventry
Mr Heaton-Harris explained that the inquiry would focus specifically on four grounds identified by the court, including handling and sharing of intelligence, use of cell phone analysis, advance knowledge of the bomb, and whether disruption operations could have been mounted. The decision was made to establish a statutory inquiry rather than a non-statutory one or referring it to an independent commission due to its powers of compulsion.
Peter Kyle
Lab
Hove and Portslade
Paid tribute to victims of the Omagh bombing, praised the Secretary of State for his decision but criticised inconsistencies in how other atrocities are treated. Emphasised the importance of providing justice and information to all victims.
Defended the Government's position on the legacy Bill, stating that it aims to provide answers where previous investigations have failed. Highlighted efforts to improve the legislation through discussions with interested parties and emphasised the need for a targeted public inquiry that avoids delays.
Acknowledged the Secretary of State's decision, supported the new inquiry while noting differences from previous approaches. Emphasised addressing defects in public inquiries to ensure efficiency and sensitivity towards security concerns.
Welcomed the announcement but expressed concern about disparities between the Omagh bombing inquiry and other cases under the legacy Bill. Called for equal access to justice, truth, and reconciliation for all victims regardless of the time elapsed.
Robin Walker
Con
Carmarthen West and South Pembroke
Commends the Secretary of State for his presentation, emphasises that the Omagh bomb failed in its objectives to disrupt peace, urges engagement with victims' groups and addressing information disparity on both sides of the border.
Daventry
Acknowledges the importance of moving forward after the peace process, reiterates the aim to keep information flowing between governments for the benefit of victims' groups and to respect all sides in their quest for justice.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Supports the Secretary of State's announcement, emphasises the need for a comprehensive investigation into the Omagh bomb incident, stressing that it was planned and transported from the Republic of Ireland.
Welcomes the statement, calls on the Secretary of State to address concerns about security and intelligence failings which might have prevented the atrocity, questions whether the chair will have flexibility beyond set terms of reference.
Dan Jarvis
Lab
Barnsley North
Thinks highly of the Secretary of State for his decision to establish an inquiry into Omagh bombing, expresses concern about how the inquiry relates to the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill and calls on him to keep an open mind.
Thanked the Secretary of State for his statement without providing further details or position beyond gratitude.
Government Response
Defended the Government’s approach, emphasising efforts to improve the legacy Bill through discussions with interested parties. Highlighted the need for a targeted public inquiry that avoids delays and ensures sensitive information is handled appropriately. Acknowledged the complexity of ongoing discussions and emphasised a constructive relationship with Irish counterparts, stressing that information flow between governments is crucial.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.