← Back to House of Commons Debates
The British Nationality Bill - Clause 1
06 June 2023
Lead MP
Robert Jenrick
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
No tags
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
Robert Jenrick raised concerns about the british nationality bill - clause 1 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Moves the Bill to address a technical legal issue identified by the Home Office with regard to the criteria for determining whether European Economic Area nationals living in the UK during the period from 1 January 1983 to 1 October 2000 were 'settled'. The Bill aims to provide reassurance and legal certainty about the citizenship status of individuals born in the UK to parents who were considered settled on the basis of exercising a free movement right, clarifying that such individuals should be treated as British citizens.
Layla Moran
Lib Dem
Oxford West and Abingdon
Welcomes the Bill. Highlights a constituent who had to prove her nationality despite living in the UK for 33 years, showing that the legislation will resolve issues of this kind.
Theresa Villiers
Con
Welcomes the swift action taken by the Government. Emphasises a constituent's case where a son was told his citizenship was in jeopardy, underscoring the importance of legal certainty.
Gregory Campbell
DUP
East Londonderry
Supports the Bill and requests that once it passes, the Minister looks at providing British passports to individuals born in Ireland after 1948 who currently cannot get them without naturalising.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Fully supports and welcomes the Bill. Requests clarification from the Minister on the issuance of British passports to citizens born in the United Kingdom, addressing concerns about a united Ireland.
Stephen Kinnock
Lab
Aberafan Maesteg
Stephen Kinnock supports the Bill, emphasising its narrow scope and purpose to codify legal entitlements for individuals born in the UK to EU parents between 1983 and 2000. He appreciates the Home Office's position regarding passport applications on hold due to recent litigation and asks about further research by the ONS, immediate processing of paused applications once the Bill is enacted, advice and support provisions, expedited procedures for future applications, and fee plans.
Alison Thewliss supports the clarity provided by the Bill amid Home Office confusion. She acknowledges the uncertainty faced by those applying for passports and seeks detailed information on how many individuals are affected, what steps will be taken to ensure they know their rights, and assurances against future EEA Windrush-like situations. Alison highlights the need for clearer, simpler processes around citizenship and passport applications.
Robert Jenrick
Reform
Newark
Responded to questions raised by other MPs, emphasised that the legislation will confirm citizenship rights retrospectively for British citizens who have been affected by recent litigation. Noted that 95 passport applications were paused and assured these individuals would be processed as soon as possible without additional fees. Stressed there was no need for further research or compensation beyond processing passport applications quickly.
Alison Thewliss
SNP
Glasgow Central
[INTERVENTION] Suggested that in cases of casework delays, a consolatory payment is sometimes offered. Asked if such a payment would be appropriate for the 95 individuals affected by passport application pauses.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.