← Back to House of Commons Debates
Non-Domestic Rating (Alteration of List and Appeals) (England) Bill - Amendment 4
22 May 2023
Lead MP
Peter Aldous
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
Taxation
Other Contributors: 7
At a Glance
Peter Aldous raised concerns about non-domestic rating (alteration of list and appeals) (england) bill - amendment 4 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
I beg to move amendment 4, which seeks to abolish liability to non-domestic rates of advertising when a right is granted permitting the use of land for advertising or when land is used for advertising. This will allow businesses greater freedom and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens.
Rosie Winterton
Lab
Rother Valley
I support the amendment as it seeks to abolish liability to non-domestic rates for advertising. This will be beneficial for businesses and could stimulate economic growth by reducing regulatory costs.
Sarah Owen
Lab
Luton North
She expresses concerns about additional burdens on small businesses due to intensified reporting requirements. She highlights that local government is already operating with reduced resources and that new administrative burdens need addressing. The Bill lacks detail on how new reliefs will be implemented and compensated for by local authorities.
Helen Morgan
Lib Dem
North Shropshire
She supports amendments and new clauses to improve the Bill, which she believes is not ambitious enough in fundamentally reforming an outdated tax system. She highlights concerns about the three-year gap between revaluations and suggests annual revaluations as a solution. She also argues against unnecessary red tape for small businesses imposed by the Bill.
Lee Rowley
Con
Rotherham
The Bill aims to modernise business rates through more frequent revaluations, digital data collection, and reliefs for property improvements. It offers nearly £14 billion in taxpayer subsidies this year. The Minister agrees with the general direction of amendments 13 and 14 but argues that full relief undermines broader valuations and could lead to higher taxes elsewhere.
Peter Aldous
Con
Waveney
Supports reform towards annual valuations, digitalisation, and streamlining processes. Acknowledges the Bill's progress but seeks further improvements in future legislation. Seeks to withdraw amendment due to insufficient progress.
Helen Morgan
Lib Dem
North Shropshire
Argues for annual revaluation similar to the Netherlands, criticises the current proposal as not going far enough. Highlights concerns about small businesses and warns of potential tax increases from reduced business rate income.
Sarah Owen
Lab
Luton North
Ms Owen argued that the Government missed an opportunity to provide long-term support for businesses, instead offering short-term fixes. She highlighted concerns from small businesses about administrative burdens and potential penalties, including imprisonment. The Federation of Small Businesses echoed these concerns. Ms Owen emphasised Labour's plan to scrap the current business rates system entirely and replace it with a fairer one that ensures tech giants pay their due taxes while supporting physical retailers. She proposed raising the threshold for small business rates relief to £25,000, which would save high streets over £1 billion. Ms Owen also celebrated local entrepreneurs who contribute significantly to the community.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.