← Back to House of Commons Debates
Seafarers' Employment (Rights and Recognition) Bill - Clause 18 and new amendments to various clauses
07 February 2023
Lead MP
Richard Holden
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
EconomyTaxation
Other Contributors: 18
At a Glance
Richard Holden raised concerns about seafarers' employment (rights and recognition) bill - clause 18 and new amendments to various clauses in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The Conservative MP Richard Holden moves that the clause be read a Second time, initiating discussions on several new clauses and amendments related to implementation monitoring, personal liability for non-compliance by company directors, the role of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, and various other adjustments in line with existing regulations.
Lindsay Hoyle
Speaker
Chorley
The Speaker introduces several new clauses and amendments to be discussed: implementation and monitoring, directors' personal liability for non-compliance, the role of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, and specific adjustments within various clauses.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
Morris acknowledges the Minister's efforts but raises concerns about fines adequacy and port call frequency. He argues that 120 weeks is insufficient and highlights union estimates indicating a need for broader coverage.
Hayes and Harlington
McDonnell welcomes the criminal offence provisions but questions the enforcement mechanism, particularly whether company directors will be held liable.
Christine Jardine
Lib Dem
Edinburgh West
Jardine recognises the data behind the measure but suggests that a weekly visitation frequency is substantial and raises concerns about missing out on coverage for frequent visitors.
Linden queries why the threshold changed from 52 to 120 weeks after consultation, questioning whether trade union support was ignored without compelling evidence.
Mike Kane
Lab
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Supports new clause 2, arguing that it broadens the bill's scope to include more robust protections. He highlights P&O Ferries' actions as a prime example of exploitation and criticises the lack of accountability for companies found failing the test under the Bill.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
Intervened to support Mike Kane's argument, emphasising the opportunity to move ahead with robust protections and questioning why a published version of the charter has not been made available.
Acknowledged the need for stronger seafarers' rights but urged caution on drafting broad regulations that could have unintended international consequences. He suggested focusing on specific instances and working through the International Maritime Organisation.
Gavin Newlands
SNP
Paisley and Renfrewshire North
Mr. Newlands supports amendments aiming to strengthen the Bill by ensuring wider protection for seafarers, including those in renewable sectors. He raises concerns about voluntary agreements and the absence of a mandatory charter, highlighting issues with P&O Ferries' practices and stressing the importance of legal clarity and enforcement.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
Mr. Morris interjects to express concerns about the influence of shipping companies known for abusing seafarer rights in the development of voluntary agreements, advocating for stronger protections.
John Hayes
Con
South Holland and The Deepings
I affirm some of the points made about the concessions the Government have made, endorsing the comments by Grahame Morris. New clause 2 encourages the Government to look more widely at terms and conditions enjoyed by many seafarers. The Bill is welcome but there is a need for a bigger review of these matters.
Roger Gale
Con
Herne Bay and Sandwich
Called upon to ensure the debate does not overrun, suggesting the pace of previous speakers needs adjustment. Emphasised the importance of addressing conditions that affect recruitment into seafaring.
David Linden
Lab
Aberdeen South
Supports new clause 4 to penalize directors who exploit workers, as seen in the P&O Ferries incident. Argues that current legislation lacks personal liability for such actions.
Hayes and Harlington
Calls for firm legislation against fire and rehire to prevent another P&O incident. Argues that criminal sanctions should apply to named directors to ensure personal liability.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
Supports the amendment to enforce national minimum wage in UK territorial waters for seafarers with close ties to the UK. Acknowledges feedback from Members but argues that expanding scope could include services without legitimate ties to the UK. Emphasises progress on international standards and cooperation.
Louise Haigh
Lab
Sheffield Heeley
Supports the amendments for beefing up enforcement, allowing unlimited fines, ensuring fine revenue goes towards welfare, and addressing loopholes. Urges the Minister to publish a seafarers' charter setting minimum conditions.
John Hayes
Con
South Holland and The Deepings
Intervened to agree with the need for a seafarers' charter but questioned whether this Bill is the right place for it due to its broader scope.
Gavin Newlands
SNP
Paisley and Renfrewshire North
Acknowledges progress made by concessions from the Minister but remains disappointed that the seafarers' charter is not included. Thinks the Bill is a missed opportunity despite some positive aspects.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.