← Back to House of Commons Debates
Veterans Welfare Services
21 November 2023
Lead MP
Johnny Mercer
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
EmploymentParliamentary Procedure
Other Contributors: 21
At a Glance
Johnny Mercer raised concerns about veterans welfare services in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
With permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, I updated the House on the Government's work to improve welfare services for veterans. Under the current Prime Minister, the experience of being a veteran has transformed with the introduction of defined pathways for housing and healthcare backed by record funding. The government commissioned an independent review into seven bodies including Veterans UK, which was published in July 2023. The government accepts the majority of the review's recommendations and plans to respond formally by year-end. Key changes include retiring the 'Veterans UK' brand in 2024 with a replacement to be announced later, renaming the Minister for Defence People, Veterans and Service Families as ‘Minister for Defence People and Families’ for clarity on coordination responsibilities, exploring options to transform Veterans’ Gateway, and improving digitisation through a £40 million programme. The government aims to make the UK the best place in the world to be a veteran by ensuring efficient and effective services.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Question
Asked when the Government would publish its full response to the independent review, as it is due by year-end with only a few weeks remaining.
Minister reply
The Minister did not provide an exact date but acknowledged that the formal response was due by the end of the year and promised to ensure that welfare services for veterans and their families are efficient and effective.
Torfaen
Question
Inquired about what more can be done to support veterans during winter, given the cost of living crisis.
Minister reply
The Minister acknowledged the challenges faced by veterans and families due to rising costs and assured that efforts are being made to ensure that veterans have access to necessary services and support.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Question
Inquires about the delayed Government response to the independent review of UK veteran welfare services. Raises concerns over worsening support for veterans, lack of action on promises, and the need for a single strategy inclusive of family members and bereaved. Questions training needs and capacity shortages in casework management, as well as digitisation programme expenditure on veterans' welfare services.
Minister reply
Responds by stating that Labour's questions are not relevant to veterans' affairs and accuses them of playing politics with veterans. Reiterates commitment to delivering ID cards by the end of 2023 and acknowledges efforts in improving resources for Veterans UK.
Question
Thanks the Minister and asks about his vision for what comes after Veterans UK, referencing a previous survey on the organisation.
Minister reply
Tributes James Sunderland's work in APPG on veterans and acknowledges the need to improve clarity around Veterans UK functions. Mentions quinquennial review into armed forces compensation tied with full response to the veterans' welfare review by year-end.
Patricia Gibson
SNP
Question
Questions the Minister's statement, highlighting its inadequacy in addressing the cost of living crisis affecting veterans. Asks about lobbying efforts and support for veterans missing out on pension credit due to military compensation awards.
Minister reply
Acknowledges the importance of cost of living support and mentions funds available through the Royal British Legion and the Office for Veterans’ Affairs. Emphasises improvements in veteran welfare over the last seven years.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
Queries about Government strategy drawing on experienced charities such as Veterans Aid.
Minister reply
Pays tribute to veterans' charities and highlights examples of collaboration with Op Courage and Op Fortitude.
South Shields
Question
Asks about the Minister's response regarding nuclear test veterans who were blood tested in the '50s and '60s.
Minister reply
Acknowledges efforts to deliver the medal for nuclear test veterans and denies a cover-up, emphasising the need to act maturely.
Darren Henry
Con
Question
Inquires about support for small veteran charities like Forces in the Community.
Minister reply
References the Armed Forces Covenant Fund Trust providing £10 million annually to support vital charities, large and small.
Dan Jarvis
Lab
Barnsley North
Question
Asks about plans for a fitting 80th anniversary tribute to veterans of Operation Overlord and Operation Market Garden.
Minister reply
Pays tribute to the hon. Member’s work and confirms Government plans to honour these veterans appropriately next year.
Siobhan Baillie
Con
Question
Asks about the transition period towards new veteran services post-Vets UK, particularly concerning VUK.
Minister reply
Explains the retirement of the Vets UK brand and vision for improving support through Veterans’ Gateway.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Question
Inquires about discussions with DWP or Treasury regarding benefits changes that might affect veterans.
Minister reply
States he has not discussed this issue, avoiding commenting on the upcoming autumn statement.
Douglas Ross
Con
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Question
Welcomes the statement on war widows' pension issue but raises concerns that fewer than 400 women may not get the expected money from the UK Government despite previous announcements.
Minister reply
Acknowledges his work since 2017 and expresses satisfaction with the ex-gratia payment, although it does not replace a pension. Reiterates that such payments should be available to everyone entitled but agrees to review the points raised.
Steve McCabe
Lab
Birmingham, Selly Oak
Question
Questions the Government’s position on frozen pensions for ex-service personnel living abroad and suggests they deserve special treatment.
Minister reply
Considers this a difficult Treasury policy area but acknowledges veterans' desire for uprated pensions. Promises to advocate continuously for them as a special case.
Mark Pritchard
Con
The Wrekin
Question
Praises the Minister’s efforts and commends improvements in veteran support over the years, highlighting his constituency's Battle Back Centre.
Minister reply
Acknowledges significant progress but remains committed to improving veterans' care further. Invites the Minister to visit various centres for a better understanding.
Owen Thompson
Con
Taunton Deane
Question
Asks for assurances regarding a root-and-branch review of existing complaints and services within Veterans UK.
Minister reply
Clarifies that retiring the Veterans UK brand does not imply rebranding, emphasising changes to interrelationships between bereavement, compensation, and welfare services.
Matthew Offord
Con
Hendon
Question
Welcomes the Minister's role in veteran support and shares a personal case of a veteran who received necessary help through his intervention.
Minister reply
Acknowledges the work done by his office to assist individual cases. Mentions Op Fortitude, aimed at ending homelessness among veterans this Christmas.
Toby Perkins
Lab
Chesterfield
Question
Asks for further details on what will replace Veterans UK and how it aligns with the Government’s response to the review.
Minister reply
Sets objectives focusing on accountability, resourcing, digitisation, and improving outcomes in compensation. Emphasises a journey towards better veterans care.
Carla Lockhart
DUP
Upper Bann
Question
Requests assurances for the support of Northern Ireland veterans who have experienced traumatic events and barriers to care.
Minister reply
Acknowledges ongoing work in Northern Ireland, including funding the NIVSO (£500,000) and respecting devolved authorities while aiming for standardised veteran support.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
Question
Thanked the Minister for his update and highlighted the work of the East Durham Veterans Trust in providing mental health support. Mentioned the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers' pioneering telephone-based app. Proposed a veterans’ bank holiday to highlight their welfare, noting that the UK is behind on number of bank holidays.
Minister reply
Acknowledged the idea of a veterans’ bank holiday positively and mentioned ongoing efforts such as Op Courage, which spends between £22 million and £24 million annually and had 19,000 referrals in its first year. Emphasised commitment to reducing unmet mental health need among veterans.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
Welcomed the Minister's statement and recognised his understanding of veterans’ issues from both service and personal nature. Inquired about pilot funding for level-up medical and welfare services in Northern Ireland, asking if all veterans would qualify regardless of length of service.
Minister reply
Confirmed there is no criterion based on length of service for eligibility; qualification is based on 24 hours’ service. Emphasised the commitment to supporting veterans irrespective of where they served within the UK.
Shadow Comment
Luke Pollard
Shadow Comment
Thanking the Minister, Luke Pollard stated that Labour is proud of its veterans but criticised the statement for lacking substance. He questioned when the full Government response to the independent review would be published as it was due by year-end with only a few weeks remaining. The review highlighted issues such as an impenetrable welfare system and out-dated paper records, leading Pollard to ask how much of the £40 million digitisation programme will go towards veterans’ welfare services and when outdated reliance on paper records would end. He also questioned staff training needs and capacity shortages in light of over-stretched welfare managers and a high turnover rate.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.