← Back to House of Commons Debates
EU Programmes
07 September 2023
Lead MP
Michelle Donelan
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
EconomyEmploymentClimateBrexitForeign AffairsScience & Technology
Other Contributors: 14
At a Glance
Michelle Donelan raised concerns about eu programmes in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
EconomyEmploymentClimateBrexitForeign AffairsScience & Technology
Government Statement
The UK has secured a landmark deal allowing participation in Horizon Europe and Copernicus, providing British scientists and businesses with access to the world’s largest research collaboration programme. This deal includes cooperation with Norway, New Zealand, Israel, Korea, and Canada. The negotiation was delayed due to the Northern Ireland protocol but resumed thanks to the Windsor framework. The UK will not pay for membership during its non-participation period and has a clawback mechanism protecting taxpayers. Immediate funding certainty is provided through the 2024 work programme, with remaining 2023 calls funded by the UK guarantee. An additional £650 million investment in fusion technology is announced, alongside a commitment to invest £20 billion in research and development. The statement highlights the deal's benefits for job creation, international collaboration on major challenges like climate change and health, and global scientific leadership.
Torfaen
Question
How much will the UK contribute financially to Horizon and other schemes in future years? What financial disadvantages have we incurred by missing out on earlier rounds? How does our associate member status impact strategic shaping of Horizon’s future?
Minister reply
The minister did not provide specific figures but emphasised that Britain is not paying for membership during its non-participation period. She highlighted the clawback mechanism protecting taxpayers and stated that participation now provides immediate funding certainty.
Torfaen
Question
What risks does our exclusion from Euratom pose for international collaboration and energy security?
Minister reply
The minister did not directly address this risk but emphasised the UK’s investment in fusion technology and its commitment to becoming a science and tech superpower by 2030.
Torfaen
Question
The MP criticised the delay in rejoining Horizon Europe, expressing concern over lost funding rounds and brain drain. He questioned the precise financial contribution to Horizon and asked how associate membership impacts strategic shaping of future programmes. The MP also raised concerns about the exclusion of Euratom.
Minister reply
The Secretary of State responded by highlighting the government's efforts in bridging gaps with the Horizon guarantee and securing a good deal for taxpayers, businesses, scientists, and researchers. She clarified that the UK will not pay retroactively for missed periods and provided figures on financial contributions. On Euratom exclusion, she stated that sector consultations supported this decision.
Greg Clark
Con
Barnet and Camden
Question
The MP praised the deal's potential to advance UK status as a science superpower while welcoming Horizon funding for both academic institutions and British industry. He inquired about formal consultations with the UK Atomic Energy Authority.
Minister reply
The Secretary of State confirmed that sector-wide consultations, including those with the UK Atomic Energy Authority, supported the government's approach on Euratom.
Marion Fellows
SNP
Glasgow North West
Question
The SNP welcomed Horizon association but expressed disappointment over not pursuing full EU membership and the exclusion of Euratom. The MP also questioned re-entering Copernicus and Erasmus+.
Minister reply
The Secretary of State reiterated that the UK will remain outside the EU under this Government, while stating that sector consultations supported the decision on Euratom. She clarified that the agreement pertained to Horizon Europe rather than Erasmus+, highlighting the Turing scheme as an alternative.
Vicky Ford
Con
Chelmsford
Question
The MP declared her involvement in setting up Horizon 2020 and praised its potential for innovation across borders and disciplines. She thanked the Prime Minister and negotiating teams for securing the deal.
Minister reply
The Secretary of State acknowledged her right hon. Friend's experience, expressing gratitude and emphasising the deal's benefits to businesses, scientists, and researchers.
Stephen Timms
Lab
East Ham
Question
The MP expressed relief at the rejoining of Horizon Europe but questioned the extent of influence UK could have on shaping future programme.
Minister reply
The Secretary of State confirmed that associate membership grants the opportunity to lead projects from 2024 and participate in ongoing and upcoming opportunities.
James Grey
Con
North Wiltshire
Question
Welcoming the statement, James Grey inquired about specific commitments for Arctic science, noting the significant interest of UK universities and institutions.
Minister reply
Acknowledging his neighbour's work on environmental issues, Michelle Donelan highlighted Britain's strong position in Arctic research and assured support through Horizon Europe membership.
Wera Hobhouse
Lib Dem
Bath
Question
Welcoming the rejoining of Horizon but noting limitations with the Turing scheme compared to Erasmus, Wera Hobhouse requested collaboration to improve the scheme's efficiency.
Minister reply
Michelle Donelan agreed to coordinate a conversation regarding the University of Bath’s concerns and highlighted that the Turing scheme is globally oriented and more inclusive than Erasmus.
Mike Penning
Con
Hemel Hempstead
Question
Congratulating on securing an excellent deal, Mike Penning sought clarification regarding a Horizon project suspended due to COVID-19 affecting fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.
Minister reply
The Science Minister agreed to discuss this matter extensively with Mike Penning.
Mary Glindon
Lab
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Question
Expressing relief and welcoming the news, Mary Glindon requested assurance that Cancer Research UK's hope for continued participation in future European research programmes will be realised.
Minister reply
Michelle Donelan assured that Horizon Europe’s focus on tackling cancer would continue to be key.
Selaine Saxby
Con
North Devon
Question
Welcoming the announcement, Selaine Saxby inquired about extending research opportunities into rural communities.
Minister reply
Michelle Donelan emphasised the levelling-up agenda and highlighted agri-tech as a focus area for Horizon Europe collaborations.
Richard Fuller
Con
North Bedfordshire
Question
Congratulating on achieving a deal that benefits taxpayers, Richard Fuller inquired about future project leadership rights, expansion opportunities post-2027, and the Government’s commitment to R&D spending.
Minister reply
Michelle Donelan assured the UK's leading role within Horizon Europe, potential for expanding beyond current members, and ongoing focus on competitive interests.
Shadow Comment
Nick Thomas-Symonds
Shadow Comment
The Labour Party criticises the delay of two years in securing association to Horizon Europe due to government bluster and division. The shadow minister highlights the loss of potential research funding and talent, citing examples like cancer specialists leaving for other opportunities. He questions the financial contribution to Horizon, impacts on shaping future programme direction, and risks associated with not joining Euratom. Labour expresses concern over economic growth under this government's leadership while acknowledging that the scientific community can make the best of limited opportunities.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.