← Back to House of Commons Debates
Resettlement of Afghans
19 September 2023
Lead MP
Johnny Mercer
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
ImmigrationForeign AffairsLocal Government
Other Contributors: 17
At a Glance
Johnny Mercer raised concerns about resettlement of afghans in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Since June 2021, around 24,600 people from Afghanistan have been relocated to the UK. The minister highlighted that indefinite leave to remain was granted to all Afghans arriving through legal means, along with access to benefits and support services. Bridging hotels were used temporarily due to the urgency of the evacuation but were discontinued as they were costly and unsustainable in the long term. By 31 August, bridging hotel usage for relocated Afghans ended, with over 85% moving into settled accommodation or being pre-matched. The minister thanked local authorities and partners for their efforts and urged continued support from the public. He also addressed ongoing resettlement efforts for those yet to arrive in the UK.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Question
The shadow questions how many Afghans remain in time-limited accommodation, when this figure is expected to reach zero, the accommodation arrangement for new arrivals, financial package details, and costs associated with the eviction process. He also asks about the status of ARAP applications, efforts to bring eligible people from Afghanistan out of harm's way, those waiting in Pakistan, and the number accessing homelessness provisions.
Minister reply
The minister did not provide a direct answer but emphasised ongoing support for resettlement efforts and thanked local authorities. He acknowledged the need to address outstanding issues but did not offer specific figures or timelines.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Question
I thank the Minister for advance sight of the statement. Today’s statement is a continuation of a shameful saga of Government failure when it comes to the Afghans who served alongside our forces in Afghanistan. The Opposition are proud of our armed forces and of the Afghans who served alongside them, but the Minister has not addressed their wider commitment. Where is the apology from him for his policy of neglect? He should provide more detail on a number of questions including how many Afghans and their families are still in time-limited accommodation approved by the Government, expected timeline to zero this figure, how new arrivals will be placed, financial costs, ARAP application processing delays, Afghan refugees waiting in Pakistan, local authority homelessness provision, and commitments to get people out of harm's way from the Taliban.
Minister reply
That was pretty embarrassing from the hon. Gentleman. It was disappointing to receive a typically unpleasant response to the hundreds of people who have worked across the country to deliver this policy. I stood in this House and promised that we would close bridging hotels by 31 August, which has been delivered. Nobody has slept rough throughout this process. The new arrivals he talks about are not within the scope of this statement. He should know that none of the £285 million came from the OVA budget.
Question
I thank the Minister for dealing appropriately with the response from the Opposition Front Bench. During the next week I would like him, or one of his colleagues, to follow up the case that I raised with the Leader of the House last Thursday. An International Security Assistance Force commander said of that person that he, “because of his service in support of the NATO Armed Forces in the Afghan Theatre of Combat Operations…has suffered and continues suffering threats to the life and property of himself.” I know that is not for the Minister to answer today, but I make that request. I want to be approached by the right person to find out how we can solve that problem.
Minister reply
My office will have heard that today. We will ensure that that individual’s case—I saw my hon. Friend’s question last week—is raised with my office. We will do everything we can to provide him with an answer and to see where we go from there.
Alison Thewliss
SNP
Glasgow Central
Question
Discussed the issue of Afghan refugees not being resettled via official schemes and cited specific cases, such as medical students who are unable to continue their education in Afghanistan. Questioned why there is no commitment for these women to come to Scotland despite available places.
Minister reply
Acknowledged concerns about individuals remaining in Afghanistan but emphasised the focus on those already relocated to the UK. Stated that officials worked tirelessly to move Afghan refugees from hotels into more permanent accommodation, and offered to review specific cases of hotel evictions.
Jack Lopresti
Con
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Question
Encouraged councils and legally resettled Afghans to utilise broader mainstream support such as English language classes and unemployment support.
Minister reply
Confirmed the provision of extensive financial support for resettlement, including £9,000 per family, £7,000 per person, a £20,000 integration fund over three years, and £28 per person daily for up to six months in temporary accommodation.
Diana R. Johnson
Lab
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Question
Asked about progress with councils and other accommodation providers to bring ARAP-approved Afghans waiting in third countries into the UK, suggesting a Homes for Ukraine-style scheme.
Minister reply
Acknowledged ongoing consideration of all options to support people in Afghanistan who need resettlement in the UK.
Alun Cairns
Con
Vale of Glamorgan
Question
Praised the Minister's leadership and coordination across government departments, suggesting a visit for the Minister to meet Afghan families settled in his constituency.
Minister reply
Expressed willingness to visit the area to better understand local integration efforts. Stressed the enduring commitment of the Government to support Afghans.
Stephen Doughty
Lab/Co-op
Cardiff South and Penarth
Question
Recognised the Minister's visit with him earlier, inquired about homelessness statistics at the end of the process, raised concerns about equivalency of qualifications for Afghans, and asked about recognition of their skills.
Minister reply
Confirmed that no one slept rough due to this policy or a lack of provision. Promised to address issues regarding qualification equivalency in due course.
Mark Logan
SNP
Coatbridge and Chryston
Question
Asked about the extent of government pressure on the Afghan regime concerning girls' and women's education, mentioned importance of English language courses for integration.
Minister reply
Acknowledged availability of funding for English courses. Stated that issues related to Afghan politics are within the purview of the Foreign Office.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
I thank the Minister very much for his update and for the work that has been done; it quite clearly sounds good. I have a constituent who worked alongside an Afghani, and that outstanding case for resettlement has been turned down. This gentleman, alongside his wife and four children, is living in Afghanistan and in danger from the Taliban and others. He helped the UK forces—our forces—when we beckoned and asked for that help. Surely the operation of the scheme must allow for compassion and common sense.
Minister reply
I ask the hon. Member to write to me about that individual today. I am more than happy to sit down and explain the process to him, look at that case and see whether it has gone right or wrong.
Seema Malhotra
Lab Co-op
Feltham and Heston
Question
I pay tribute to Hounslow Council, my local council, the Feltham convening partnership and others who have played such an important role in supporting Afghan refugees. When the Minister came to the House in March and announced that Afghans would be evicted from UK hotels, about half the 8,000 Afghans in hotel accommodation were children. Will he update the House on how many of those children are now settled in permanent housing as well as on the ongoing strategy for the continuity of their education?
Minister reply
The support going forward is extensive. There will be £9,000 per family, with specific reintegration funding of £20,500 per person to make sure that happens. We had that deadline by 1 September because I do not want people taken out of school.
Munira Wilson
Lib Dem
Twickenham
Question
Let me start by putting on record my thanks to the Immigration Minister, the right hon. Member for Newark (Robert Jenrick), who, after 18 months of begging by me and my team, was finally persuaded to help me bring five British children and their Afghan mother to safety in the UK in June. That was after the father, who had served the previous Afghan Government and worked with NATO, was brutally assassinated by the Taliban. His much younger sister has been left behind. She is an aunt to the children but grew up like their sibling because she is much younger. She is alone with no male relatives, in hiding and in fear of her life because she is a target. Given the Minister’s repeated statements about honouring commitments to those left behind, will he meet me to discuss her case so that we can bring her to safety?
Minister reply
If the hon. Lady sends me the details, I am more than happy to look at them.
Question
On Friday I had the privilege of visiting the Refugee and Migrant Centre in Birmingham. Will the Minister join me in paying tribute to its great work in housing Afghan evacuees? The issue now is that rents have gone up quite significantly, and the centre is finding it difficult to house people.
Minister reply
The pressures on housing across the United Kingdom are well-known. That is why we designed a clever scheme to increase the local housing allowance and combine it with the local authority housing fund.
Barry Gardiner
Lab
Brent West
Question
I commend the Government on the way in which they set up the Ukraine family scheme within a week of the Russian invasion. But the parallel family reunion mechanism for Afghans resettled or called forward for evacuation under pathway 1 of ACRS is still not implemented. I have more than 450 Afghan families in my constituency who are desperate to be reunited with families. Two years on, those families still have no way of bringing their loved ones to safety.
Minister reply
I am always looking at what more we can do in this space. It is easy to forget the depth of the carnage in Afghanistan.
Question
The Minister said that he looks forward to welcoming more of those who stood up for British values at great personal risk, so I want to draw his attention to precisely one of those. My constituent is a former Chevening scholar who has been in fear of his life since 2021. He has, at last, been provisionally accepted on ACRS pathway 3.
Minister reply
I ask the hon. Lady to send me the details of the case directly.
Neil Coyle
Lab
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Question
My constituent’s brother trained and fought alongside UK forces. He escaped murder by the Taliban by fleeing across the border, injured and without papers. Can the Minister confirm how many Afghans have been relocated from third countries under pathways 2 and 3 of the resettlement scheme?
Minister reply
Those schemes lie with the Home Office and the immigration system.
Shadow Comment
Luke Pollard
Shadow Comment
The shadow criticises the government's failure in delivering commitments made to Afghans who served alongside British forces. He questions the eviction process from bridging hotels, demanding an apology for neglecting their needs for 18 months. The shadow asks for details on current and future arrivals' accommodation plans and financial costs of resettlement efforts. He raises concerns about those still waiting in Pakistan and Afghanistan and challenges the minister's claims regarding homelessness support.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.