← Back to House of Commons Debates
National Crime Agency Investigation: Javad Marandi
16 May 2023
Lead MP
Chris Philp
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
Crime & Law EnforcementTaxationCulture, Media & SportStandards & Ethics
Other Contributors: 12
At a Glance
Chris Philp raised concerns about national crime agency investigation: javad marandi in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Crime & Law EnforcementTaxationCulture, Media & SportStandards & Ethics
Government Statement
The Minister emphasised that the Government does not comment on ongoing law enforcement investigations. He stated that UK electoral laws include stringent donation controls to ensure transparency and restrict foreign third-party campaigning. The Elections Act 2022 introduced reforms such as a ban on foreign third-party campaigning, increased transparency requirements for political parties with assets over £500, and a new registration threshold for third-party campaigners spending more than £10,000 during election periods. The Government are developing an anti-corruption strategy to address national security concerns and strengthen public trust in institutions.
Alison Thewliss
SNP
Glasgow Cheetham
Question
The news that Javad Marandi has lost a legal battle with the BBC highlights transparency and freedom of the press. Marandi's companies are linked to money laundering networks, and the UK must not be a haven for dirty money.
Minister reply
The Minister acknowledged the importance of transparency and free speech in exposing wrongdoing. He mentioned the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill aimed at strengthening measures against dirty money. The Government is also committed to anti-SLAPP legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
When will the Government introduce anti-SLAPPs legislation given its importance?
Minister reply
The Minister affirmed the commitment to introducing anti-SLAPPs legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows.
Question
Why has it taken until now for the Government to address revelations about Mr Marandi's donations? Will they return donations received from him?
Minister reply
The Minister welcomed NCA investigations into apparent wrongdoing and emphasised that all political parties need to be vigilant about donations, regardless of party affiliation. He did not confirm whether donations would be returned or if the Government would support Lord Carlile’s amendment.
Desmond Swayne
Con
New Forest West
Question
Is legislation already before the House being considered for anti-SLAPPs measures?
Minister reply
The Minister confirmed that his colleague, the Lord Chancellor, is looking at using existing legislation for SLAPPs.
Margaret Hodge
Lab
Barking
Question
I thank the hon. Member for Glasgow Central (Alison Thewliss) for tabling the urgent question and you, Mr Speaker, for granting it. These revelations are completely damning. There is an investigation into the Azerbaijan laundromat. A total of $2.9 billion was stolen. It was laundered through UK companies and used to bribe politicians and line the pockets of the corrupt Azerbaijani elite, and Javad Marandi is linked with it. Now we hear that he donated three quarters of a million pounds to the Tory party, got an OBE and access to Government Ministers. We should take these allegations very seriously. If they are true, dirty money has well and truly crept into our politics. The Conservative party will not regulate itself, so will the Government bring forward regulations requiring all parties to do due diligence and checks on the source of all political donations? Will the Minister make sure that this donation is returned, and will he investigate and report back to Parliament on any access that Mr Marandi got to Government Ministers because of his large donations to the Conservative party?
Minister reply
As I have said, the rules in this area are being debated as the National Security Bill passes through the House. They are currently being debated in the House of Lords and, as I said in response to the shadow Minister, they may well return here in the course of ping-pong. I welcome the National Crime Agency’s investigation and court action, because no one wants to see dirty money flowing through London. The fact that the NCA is taking action is therefore to be welcomed. I gently repeat the point I made previously, that people are entitled to be assumed innocent until proven guilty. Issues of this kind are not exclusive to one side or the other; I have referred already to the foreign agent of the Chinese Government who was linked to a senior Labour Member of Parliament. In that context, all political parties—not just the two main ones, but the others too—need to exercise caution and vigilance in these matters, for all the reasons that the right hon. Lady just outlined.
Edinburgh West
Question
I thank the hon. Member for Glasgow Central (Alison Thewliss) for tabling the question and you for allowing it, Mr Speaker. Today’s revelations about Mr Marandi’s donations not only raise serious questions about the relationship between money and power in our democracy at present, but are a major security concern. If the Prime Minister is serious about restoring integrity to politics, as he has said, will the Government also now launch an independent inquiry into those and other donations?
Minister reply
As I have said, there is a live law enforcement investigation connected with the Azerbaijan allegations. I think the right thing to do is to allow that NCA investigation to reach its conclusion.
Cat Smith
Lab
Lancaster and Wyre
Question
The Minister will know, as we all do, that trust in democracy and our electoral law is precious and should be kept. Today’s revelations come on top of revelations yesterday by a Government MP that the voter ID laws were an attempt at gerrymandering. The public’s trust is precious; it is easily lost and hard to gain. The Minister mentioned aspects of the Elections Act 2022. Parts of that Act make it easier for foreign actors with bad intentions to influence British politics, so will he look again particularly at the overseas electors loopholes included in that legislation, to ensure that our democracy remains safe and secure?
Minister reply
I agree with the hon. Lady that it is vital that our elections remain safe and secure, but the Elections Act included a number of measures that further tightened up our law, not least the restriction on foreign third parties campaigning at elections, and the strengthening of the transparency framework in relation to political finance. The Act significantly strengthened the law in that area.
Martin Docherty
SNP
West Dunbartonshire
Question
I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Glasgow Central (Alison Thewliss) on securing this urgent question on something we both have an established interest in. The Javad Marandi case shows that bad-faith actors find it too easy to buy access into the body politic, yet most of his donations were done through the official Conservative and Unionist party channels. Earlier this month, we saw painstaking investigation by Jim Fitzpatrick of openDemocracy, showing how shady so-called think tanks such as Our Scottish Future had the lowest possible financial transparency ranking, leaving them open to manipulation from unknown dark-money donors like the notorious Constitutional Research Council during the Brexit referendum. Can the Minister say how the Government are going to ensure that those think tanks and campaigning organisations, which have a clear political goal, comply with best practice and declare who their donors are?
Minister reply
Organisations engaged in political campaigning are covered by the expanded remit of recent legislation—but when it comes to transparency of political donations, I must say the Scottish Nationalists have quite a cheek lecturing anyone else.
Steve McCabe
Lab
Birmingham Selly Oak
Question
I understand there has been a court judgment that a $500,000 deposit by Mr Marandi is one of the sources of the £1 million seized by the National Crime Agency as illicit money. Given that, does the Minister think it would offer some public reassurance if he were able to say from the Dispatch Box now that the Government party will immediately investigate the sources of donations it has received from Mr Marandi?
Minister reply
I am afraid I do not know the details of the cash flows connected with that gentleman; nor do I know the details of the live investigation. I suggest to Members of the House that we wait until the investigation is concluded. All political parties should be careful, in the way the hon. Gentleman just described, in making sure that donations they receive are properly sourced and untainted.
Peter Grant
SNP
Glenrothes
Question
I find it astonishing that a Minister who knew he was coming to the Dispatch Box to answer this question did not bother to read the BBC’s webpage, which had a very simple diagram showing exactly where the £40 million Mr Marandi received had come from. I commend my hon. Friend the Member for Glasgow Central (Alison Thewliss) not only on securing this urgent question, but on her determination in dragging the Government kicking and screaming to the point that they are finally going to do something about the Scottish limited partnerships, because, as we all know, there has never been any legitimate purpose for establishing them. Two of the partnerships she mentioned, Hilux Services and Polux Management, have been named in court by a judge as part of a money laundering ring. During the short period that Hilux Services existed, from 26 March 2013 to 3 October 2016, a time in which Mr Marandi was a significant beneficiary of the company, he donated £143,000 to the Conservative party. Does the Minister accept that, if it is established that, during the time Mr Marandi was making the donations, he was also in receipt of dirty, laundered money, that money must be paid back immediately?
Minister reply
As I have repeatedly said, the Government cannot, will not and should not comment on live investigations, and we never have. The hon. Member asserts as fact what he has read on a news website, but let us wait for the investigation to conclude before drawing conclusions. The last people I will take lectures from on campaign transparency when it comes to finance are the nationalists, who are under investigation by Police Scotland as we speak.
Alex Sobel
Lab/Co-op
Leeds Central and Headingley
Question
There has been reporting on Mr Marandi’s links with the Azerbaijani laundromat, including his links to the ruling family of Azerbaijan and his facilitating property deals for them, for at least six years. Does the Minister think it is moral to retain the donations from Mr Marandi?
Minister reply
I think we should wait for the investigation to get to the bottom of the facts, rather than basing conclusions on rumours and assumption. It is important that that investigation concludes but, as I have said, it is incumbent on all political parties to be very careful and thoughtful about where they take donations from.
Shadow Comment
Alison Thewliss
Shadow Comment
The Shadow responded by highlighting the case of Javad Marandi, who lost a legal battle with the BBC but remains unproven as having committed wrongdoing. She praised transparency and freedom of the press in exposing corruption involving Azerbaijan. She criticised the Conservative government for enabling dirty money to enter UK through corporate structures.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.