← Back to House of Commons Debates
Constitutional Law
21 May 2024
Lead MP
John Lamont
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
ScotlandLocal Government
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
John Lamont raised concerns about constitutional law in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The order amends UK legislation to increase the cumulative borrowing limits of the Scottish Government ahead of the next financial year. It upholds the 2023 fiscal framework agreement and reflects inflation in the borrowing limits, increasing resource-borrowing limit by £29 million from £1.75 billion to £1.78 billion, and capital-borrowing limit by £50 million from £3 billion to £3.05 billion.
Angus MacNeil
SNP
Western Isles
The UK Government has balanced its books only in 11 years since 1945 and paid back less than 2% of the debt accrued. The Scottish Government should not be restricted by Westminster and should work towards independence.
Ian Murray
Lab
Edinburgh South
Critiques the Conservative government for their economic policies such as trebling national debt, crashing the economy, high interest rates, and reducing living standards. He also calls out the proposed £46 billion unfunded tax cut to scrap National Insurance without providing a payment plan. Murray emphasises the need for fiscal responsibility and criticises both UK and Scottish governments for their failures, advocating for a Labour government as the solution.
Christine Jardine
Lib Dem
Edinburgh West
Questions whether the problems with spending and constant arguments are in the best interests of Scotland's people. She suggests that closer cooperation between UK and Scottish Governments would benefit Scotland more than current dynamics.
Contrasts the success of Ireland, which has a single government and budget surplus, with the perceived mess in the UK and underperformance of Scotland. He suggests that there are lessons to be learned from Ireland's governance model.
Angus MacNeil
SNP
Na h-Eileanan an Iar
MacNeil intervenes to criticise the current situation where Scotland is constrained by Westminster's spending decisions, suggesting it's unreasonable that other European countries like Spain do not have similar restrictions based on their neighbours' funding levels.
Alison Thewliss
SNP
Glasgow Central
Thewliss highlights the direct impact of budget cuts and inflation on local projects, such as the Windmillcroft Quay reconstruction project in her constituency which is now facing a £25 million shortfall due to rising construction costs.
Nigel Evans
Con
Rhyl
Evans briefly comments on Thewliss' point about capital funding cuts, emphasising the direct consequences for local projects like the Windmillcroft Quay reconstruction project facing significant inflation-induced budget shortfalls.
John Lamont
Con
Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
Lamont addresses concerns about Scotland's borrowing limits and defends Government interventions during the pandemic. He refutes claims of imposition by the UK Government on borrowing agreements with Scotland and emphasises collaborative efforts for Scottish interests. He criticises SNP spending efficiency and points out that local government funding cuts are more relevant than overall budget debates.
Government Response
Lamont defends the Government's approach to borrowing limits, emphasising collaboration with Scotland. He criticises SNP inefficiency and local government cuts while defending pandemic support measures like the furlough scheme.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.