← Back to House of Commons Debates
Afghan Special Forces Relocation Review
14 October 2024
Lead MP
Luke Pollard
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
ImmigrationDefenceTaxationForeign Affairs
Other Contributors: 19
At a Glance
Luke Pollard raised concerns about afghan special forces relocation review in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
The minister updated the House on the ongoing review of the Afghan Relocation and Assistance Policy (ARAP) applications for former members of Afghan specialist units, including Commando Force 333 and Afghan Task Force 444. He acknowledged the valour of these individuals who fought alongside UK armed forces in Afghanistan and highlighted that a cross-party group had advocated for this review since they were in opposition. The review was initiated by the previous Government due to inconsistencies in how ARAP applications from members of these units were being handled. Approximately 2,000 such applications are within scope of the review, with more than three quarters reassessed so far. Despite delays, key issues have been identified and resolved; eligible former Triples and their families are now invited to relocate to the UK. The minister confirmed evidence of direct employment relationships between some individuals in these units and the UK Government, contrary to previous reports. An overturn rate of approximately 25% is expected as decisions made under categories 1, 2, and 4 are being reassessed. He emphasised that those eligible for relocation will be informed immediately and offered protection from deportation by the UK's ongoing dialogue with Pakistan.
Andrew Bowie
Con
West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Question
The hon. Gentleman should outline what conversations he has had with Pakistani authorities to ensure that those eligible for ARAP are not evicted from their country, and how the Government will support these individuals upon relocation to the UK.
Minister reply
The minister responded by confirming ongoing constructive dialogue with Pakistan’s government to protect ARAP-eligible Afghan special forces personnel from deportation. He also emphasised the importance of providing necessary support for successful rebuilding of lives in the UK.
Andrew Bowie
Con
West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Question
The MP thanked the Minister for his statement and acknowledged cross-party support for the Triples. He asked about the course of action for applications where no direct employment evidence is found, and inquired about updates on the flow from Afghanistan to Pakistan and subsequent relocation to the UK. The MP also raised concerns about Taliban attacks on human rights.
Minister reply
The Minister responded that individuals can still qualify under ARAP even without direct employment evidence, subject to case-by-case assessment. He confirmed ongoing cooperation with Pakistani authorities to ensure eligible personnel are not evicted from Pakistan and can reach the UK safely. The Government will continue to advocate for human rights protection in Afghanistan.
Tan Dhesi
Lab
Slough
Question
The MP welcomed the Minister's statement and asked how individuals whose cases were previously rejected under ARAP would be informed about their review status.
Minister reply
The Minister stated that immediate contact will be made with those whose negative decisions are overturned based on new evidence. The Department aims to complete the review swiftly but cannot provide a specific timeline due to the complexity of remaining cases.
Helen Maguire
Lib Dem
Epsom and Ewell
Question
The MP acknowledged Paddy Ashdown’s call for support for Afghan interpreters and questioned whether the Minister had figures on estimated fatalities among Triples since their review. She also asked about confidence in other ARAP decision-making processes, steps to ensure eligibility and safe passage to the UK, and potential expansion of the armed forces covenant.
Minister reply
The Minister noted difficulties in providing exact numbers due to real-world implications but highlighted improvements being made by the new Government. The Ministry collaborates with Pakistani authorities and will consider further work on the armed forces covenant ahead of legislation.
Neil Coyle
Lab
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Question
I thank the Minister for the tone and intent of his statement, but it was not only the Triples who suffered as a result of the mistakes of the last Government, who capitulated to the Taliban. Will the Department also re-examine cases such as that of Major General Mohammad Dawood Amin, whose case the MOD closed owing to a correspondence error at its end, despite his service to the UK? His brother, Abdul Basir Jaji, and I are still raising his case. He is a constituent of mine, and we are still seeking his safety here in the UK.
Minister reply
It is hard for me to talk about individual circumstances and individual cases at the Dispatch Box, but I shall be happy to discuss the issue with the hon. Gentleman further.
Gavin Williamson
Con
Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Question
I very much welcome the announcement by the Minister. It is absolutely the right thing to be doing. I was privileged to see at first hand the amazing work that the 333 and 444 units did, side by side with British forces. Can the Minister assure the House that he will work closely with the Pakistani Government to ensure that none of those individuals is expelled or moved on from Pakistan until we are able to look at their cases? Would the Minister be able to find time to meet me in order to go through some individual cases that are a bit too sensitive to talk about on the Floor of the House?
Minister reply
I am very happy to meet the right hon. Gentleman to discuss any cases. On the conversation with the Pakistani Government, the main concern in relation to the Triples is about moving them out of Afghanistan and into Pakistan in the first place. The agreement we have with the Pakistani Government means that anyone who is being assessed as part of the ARAP scheme will not be deported back to Afghanistan, which is really important, but there is still a requirement to make sure that we can relocate eligible individuals and their immediate families to the UK in an appropriate and reasonable way.
Shaun Davies
Lab
Telford
Question
I thank the Minister for his work in this area over many years. My constituency and wider borough have played a key role in relocating a number of Afghans over many years. Can the Minister confirm that he is having conversations across Government, including with local government, to ensure that when people are relocated to the UK, it is done in a joined-up and supportive way?
Minister reply
I pay tribute to all those in my hon. Friend’s constituency who are taking steps to support our Afghan friends. We owe them a debt of gratitude, and it is not just about words; we need to make sure that we are living those words. I know that communities, and especially veterans of the conflict, take that responsibility very seriously, and I reassure him that we do too. This new Government have already looked at how we can work across Departments to ensure that we provide better value for money and a more joined-up approach, and further announcements will be made in due course.
Stephen Gethins
SNP
Arbroath and Broughty Ferry
Question
I thank the Minister for his statement and for early sight of it, and I also thank him for the attention he has given to this matter. I pay tribute to colleagues across the Chamber for their service in Afghanistan, and to those who have worked on this issue. I pay particular tribute to the former Member of Parliament for Glasgow South, Stewart McDonald. He received a letter just two weeks before the general election, at which he lost his seat, and he has been unable to take up this matter. The letter said that an error was identified in a response to a parliamentary question on 22 March 2024, which was shocking. It said that there were ineligible decisions and that assessments had been made by the Ministry of Defence—there was a bit of coverage during the election campaign that the Minister probably recalls. Will he please look into that as a matter of urgency? We recognise the brutality of the Taliban regime. We also the recognise the value that the Afghan refugee community brings to communities across the length and breadth of the UK, including in Glasgow and Dundee. Can the Minister speak to the Home Office about how we treat Afghan refugees? A lot of this goes back to the fact that we have a refugee system with a presumption against, rather than in favour of, those who are fleeing the most brutal regimes.
Minister reply
Plymouth is a long way from Scotland, but I enjoyed a cross-party friendship with Stewart McDonald. When it comes to an issue like this, it is important that partisan divides do not affect our collective work, so I am very happy to pick up the issues that the hon. Gentleman mentioned in his question.
Julia Buckley
Lab
Shrewsbury
Question
Will the Minister join me in thanking our British personnel for the hard work they have done in processing the entitled Afghan personnel—for example, at the Nesscliffe Army camp in my constituency of Shrewsbury?
Minister reply
I am happy to join my hon. Friend in doing so. When we look at the Triples in particular, it is apparent that there has been real advocacy from serving and former members in highlighting that there were inconsistencies in the decision making in support of individuals who put their lives on the line in support of our mission. That applies not only to those who served in Afghanistan; I say an enormous thanks to people who are supporting Afghans who relocate to the UK. I know that an awful lot of good work is taking place, including in Shrewsbury.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Question
I recall that when the Minister and the Security Minister were campaigning previously on behalf of the Triples, there was some doubt about the comprehensiveness of the records that show which people had actually served in the way necessary to qualify to come to the United Kingdom. Is the Minister absolutely satisfied that there is no question of any records being withheld—for example, by special forces—that would help identify eligible former members of the Triples?
Minister reply
The review has not yet completed, but as part of it we are looking at evidence amassed across different Government Departments—where evidence of a direct employment relationship can be established. This excludes top-up payments and operational payments, which sit outside that. The right hon. Gentleman will know that I am unable to comment on special forces on the Floor of the House, but I can say that all parts of His Majesty’s Government that kept records of that are contributing to the review. I have to be cautious about this because of the ongoing Afghanistan inquiry, which is looking at elements of this, but I will happily pick this up separately with him.
Kevin Bonavia
Lab
Stevenage
Question
I welcome the work that my hon. Friend the Minister did in opposition and is now putting to good use with this review. We in this country owe a special obligation to those people who are engaged with our armed forces abroad, wherever they may be, and the failures that are coming to light are really worrying. What lessons does he think we can learn from those failures?
Minister reply
I intend, at the conclusion of the Triples review, to be able to publish a full “lessons learned” summary looking at where we need to get to, but there are a number of lessons. One point that has been reinforced in my mind is that there is enormous support for those who served alongside our troops, but we did not see record keeping that matched that type of personal connection and personal thanks for those who served. That is why, as part of this work, we have instructed that there should be changes in processes within the Ministry of Defence—and beyond that, in how we work with other Departments and parts of HMG—to ensure that in future when we have a direct relationship with people, that information is properly stored and accessible.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Question
The Minister talks about the parallel independent inquiry on the deployment of special forces to Afghanistan between 2010 and 2013. Former members of UK special forces told the BBC’s “Panorama” earlier this year that they believed their veto powers on applications by Afghans claiming to have served with the Triples represented a conflict of interest. This conflict of interest might not have arisen had there been good parliamentary oversight of UK special forces. Will the Government consider extending the scrutiny powers of the Intelligence and Security Committee so that it has oversight of UK special forces?
Minister reply
I understand where the hon. Gentleman is trying to get to with his question. It is difficult for me to comment on special forces, for reasons that he will appreciate. I am also really keen to see the output of the Afghanistan inquiry and to understand what lessons Lord Haddon-Cave can identify from that. That might be the moment when that conversation is more appropriate, but it is not one that I can have now.
Calvin Bailey
Lab
Leyton and Wanstead
Question
I praise my hon. Friend for his pursuit of justice with regard to the Triples, and not only in opposition but since he has entered power. On lessons learned, one of the tenets behind a number of the Bills that the Government have pursued—in relation to the Hillsborough inquiry, for example—is a duty of candour. Might that be considered as part of the Afghanistan inquiry as a whole?
Minister reply
The Government certainly intend to bring forward the Hillsborough Bill, which I hope will enjoy cross-party support, particularly in relation to a duty of candour. What we have discovered with the Triples review—I await the final report—is more a failure to organise and record properly, rather than a deliberate attempt to disrupt and not share information. It is that essential plumbing that failed, but also the grip and leadership of the programme, and we need to learn from this to ensure that it never happens again and that all those people who had an eligible case get the support and sanctuary that they need.
Caroline Johnson
Con
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Question
In reference to the ARAP programme, Caroline Johnson inquired about a temporary centre at Beckingham camp where families will be housed in Nissen huts. She asked how long families would stay there and what funding local authorities would receive.
Minister reply
Luke Pollard reassured that transitional facilities like the one mentioned are intended for temporary use only, and he is willing to provide further details regarding the duration of their use. He also highlighted that work will be done with local authorities to ensure proper funding for supporting former Afghan personnel and their families during their stay.
Louise Jones
Lab
North East Derbyshire
Question
After serving in Afghanistan, Louise Jones asked if the review is considering other specialist units that supported UK troops beyond 333 and 444.
Minister reply
Luke Pollard thanked her for her service and confirmed that while the current review focuses on 333 and 444, there are plans to assess similar direct employment relationships with other specialist units in the future.
Munira Wilson
Lib Dem
Twickenham
Question
A constituent who served as an interpreter for British forces is at risk due to his work and has a failed ARAP application. Munira Wilson requested a meeting with the Minister to discuss potential personal intervention.
Minister reply
Luke Pollard thanked her for bringing this case forward, acknowledging the importance of getting relocation decisions right. He offered to meet her to further discuss the case and take it forward.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
Question
In response to the Minister’s statement on supporting Afghan nationals, Andrew Murrison inquired about future military conflicts and the need for a strategic defence review.
Minister reply
Luke Pollard acknowledged the importance of considering state-on-state threats while also recognising non-state threats. He highlighted that Lord Robertson is conducting a strategic defence review to address these challenges.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
Jim Shannon commended the Minister for the statement and offered support in his constituency, including housing, jobs, and school placements for an Afghan national he had previously assisted.
Minister reply
Luke Pollard thanked Jim Shannon for his kind offer and acknowledged the importance of supporting Afghans who served alongside UK forces. He reiterated that local authorities and devolved Administrations are working to ensure wraparound support for relocated families.
Shadow Comment
Andrew Bowie
Shadow Comment
The shadow welcomed the minister’s update on the review of ARAP applications for former Afghan specialist unit members, particularly the Triples. He acknowledged the issues but praised previous government initiatives such as Operation Pitting in 2021 and the establishment of the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme and ARAP. The Conservative Benches support a thorough and fair completion of this review initiated by James Heappey, aiming for correct decisions on these sensitive applications. Questions were raised about the process for Triples where no evidence of employment is found and the flow of potential ARAP-eligible individuals from Afghanistan to Pakistan. Concerns were also expressed regarding housing stock availability and support upon relocation in the UK, alongside a call for continued international pressure on the Taliban regarding human rights abuses.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.