← Back to House of Commons Debates

Local Power Plan

10 February 2026

Lead MP

Ed Miliband

Debate Type

Ministerial Statement

Tags

EconomyEmploymentClimate
Other Contributors: 28

At a Glance

Ed Miliband raised concerns about local power plan in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Government Statement

EconomyEmploymentClimate
Government Statement
Britain's drive for clean energy is focused on delivering a different kind of economy that benefits the many rather than just the wealthy and powerful. The minister highlighted recent achievements such as the warm homes plan, securing the largest offshore wind auction in European history, and agreeing to a fair work charter with business and trade unions. Today, the AR7 auction results for onshore wind and solar were published: 1.3 GW of power at £72 per megawatt-hour from onshore wind and nearly 5 GW at £65 per megawatt-hour from solar, providing power equivalent to over 3 million homes. The minister rejected calls to cancel the auction in favour of new gas stations due to higher costs. He emphasised community ownership as a transformative tool for wealth building and resilience, noting that while Denmark and Germany have significant proportions of wind and solar capacity owned by citizens, Britain currently has less than 1% of renewables under community ownership. The minister announced up to £1 billion in funding through the Great British Energy scheme to invest in community energy projects, targeting underserved areas for the biggest impact. He also committed to establishing a one-stop shop to provide support and advice to local communities planning their own renewable projects. Additionally, reforms will be made to market codes and supply licences to facilitate easier sale of power generated by communities, with consultations planned on how to use existing powers in the Infrastructure Act 2015 for shared ownership offers. The statement was concluded with an invitation to community groups to come forward with proposals, aiming at a stake for British people in the energy system, generating returns and wealth for local communities.

Shadow Comment

Greg Smith
Shadow Comment
The shadow response criticised Labour's plans as not offering value for money or reducing electricity prices. He noted that while the plan aims to shift power to local communities, it does not address the immediate need of lower energy bills and structural costs. Greg Smith argued that the £1 billion committed through Great British Energy will yield minor reductions in costs while leaving families with higher bills overall. The shadow questioned why the full impact assessment for AR7's potential to reduce bills by the early 2030s has not been published, despite claims of confidence in internal analysis. He highlighted concerns over longer contract terms and increased risk for bill payers, along with relaxed planning requirements for some offshore wind projects. Smith criticised Labour’s approach as doubling down on carbon taxes and adding more expensive renewable energy to an unprepared system, leading to higher costs for households and businesses. The shadow also challenged the establishment of Great British Energy, questioning its necessity and effectiveness in delivering lower bills compared to market-based solutions.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.