← Back to House of Commons Debates

Qualifications Reform Review

12 December 2024

Lead MP

Janet Daby

Debate Type

Ministerial Statement

Tags

EconomyEmployment
Other Contributors: 8

At a Glance

Janet Daby raised concerns about qualifications reform review in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Government Statement

EconomyEmployment
Government Statement
With permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I am making a statement on the outcomes of the review of qualifications reform at level 3. The Government aims to build a skills system that drives opportunity and economic growth. We inherited a complex qualifications landscape from the previous government which was confusing for learners and employers. This year, we paused defunding certain qualifications and conducted a stakeholder engagement review. Certainty is important for all stakeholders involved in education provision. Our decisions make clear positions up to 2027. Students deserve high-quality qualifications that meet their needs, and we must continue to develop and improve them. The curriculum and assessment review will consider long-term changes but some immediate actions are needed. We decided not to apply the previously proposed rules of combination, allowing providers flexibility in designing educational paths for students based on local economic needs. Over 200 qualifications with low or no enrolments will lose funding as scheduled. T-levels offer excellent qualification options and should be available to more learners; we introduced new T-levels this September and plan further additions. In agriculture, environment, animal care, legal, finance, accounting, business administration, creative design sectors, and engineering manufacturing, we are retaining qualifications until 2027. In digital sector, we will retain funding for six existing large digital qualifications until 2026, while also making T-level placements more flexible to accommodate remote learning. On health, science, social care, we are keeping nine health and social care qualifications funded till new alternatives are developed in 2026-7. In education and early years, the existing large-medium qualifications will be defunded as planned; six smaller ones retained for specific occupations support learners adequately. Construction T-levels have limited success due to lack of demand but offer a positive route into employment post-completion. One large qualification in site carpentry is kept along with 11 medium-small others. We aim to improve opportunities and quality, inviting awarding bodies to submit new level 3 qualifications this spring. Indecision over catering and beauty therapy T-levels will be addressed later.

Shadow Comment

Neil O'Brien
Shadow Comment
Thanking the Minister for advance sight of the statement, Neil O’Brien highlighted longstanding concerns about excessive further education qualification variety and complexity. While welcoming the introduction of higher-quality T-levels under the previous government, he questioned whether today’s announcement sufficiently simplifies this landscape up to 2027. He called for a clear vision from the Government on how they plan to simplify qualifications beyond maintaining overlapping qualifications. O’Brien also urged clarification on funding implications and commitments towards improving T-levels' appeal, ease of delivery and reducing dropout rates.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.