MP Lammy questioned why Grenfell Tower was chosen by the Government for an expensive refurbishment if the cladding used was unsafe. He called out failures across multiple institutions and asked what immediate action will be taken regarding buildings with unsafe cladding.

MP Caroline Lucas asked about accountability for non-compliance with fire safety laws before 2017. She also inquired whether there will be a review of the cladding test regime.

MP Nusrat Ghani expressed concern about the lack of progress in removing cladding and asked what measures will be taken for buildings where remediation is stalled.

Does the Prime Minister recognise how painful it must be for the Grenfell community to have had that tower looming over them for seven years, and can he give assurances regarding financial support and bringing those responsible to justice?

I thank the Prime Minister for his extremely powerful comments and associate my party with all of them. The Grenfell disaster is a tragedy that shames our whole society... Can the Prime Minister tell us when that legislation will be published, and whether the duty will cover all public officials?

The disaster was entirely foreseen and preventable, resulting from dishonesty and putting profit before people’s lives... Can he commit to ensuring that companies identified in the report are excluded from public contracts, held accountable under full law, and bear costs for remedial work?

It is clear that the conspiracy around product testing must face criminal proceedings... Will he bring responsibility under one Department, with one Minister responsible and a single regulator to prevent future wrongdoings?

Grenfell Tower is a daily presence for survivors, families of victims, and the wider community... Will he pledge that those complicit in the Grenfell fire are brought to justice?

May I refer the Prime Minister to recommendation 113.58 regarding independent incident investigation of serious building failures... Could we come and see the Prime Minister about this very serious matter?

First and foremost, today is about the families of Grenfell and the 72 people who died. For them, today is another emotionally exhausting day, but we must remember that their fight for justice is also our fight. Grenfell laid bare the sad truth of the stigma attached to social housing. It is a stigma I remember experiencing when people made assumptions because I lived on a council estate. It is a stigma that attaches to people from all walks of life—teachers, doctors and firefighters. They are people who pay their rent on time, but who are treated with disdain by housing providers. This damning report confirms that people’s voices were ignored, and that safety concerns about the industry were ignored or disregarded at all levels of the Government and the housing sector. It is unforgivable. The Prime Minister has spoken about the culture. Will he commit to ensuring that this new Government address the culture within our housing sector, which often treats social housing tenants as an afterthought?

Our hearts ache at the injustice and horror that befell individuals and their families at Grenfell Tower, and I commend the Prime Minister for the strength and power of his remarks from the Dispatch Box today. Can he give a commitment that his Government will continue to work constructively with the devolved Governments to ensure the quick removal of all cladding right across these isles, so that we do not see a repeat of this horrible tragedy?

How many times must we come here and hear another example of how the state, which should be on the side of ordinary people, becomes the enemy of working-class people? We have had Hillsborough, the Horizon Post Office scandal, the contaminated blood scandal, Windrush, and the treatment of former armed forces personnel who are members of the LGBT community. In each of those, the state has become the enemy of the people and delayed paying compensation to them. Can the Grenfell inquiry be a watershed when we end the process by which the state becomes the enemy of working-class people, we treat them with the dignity they deserve, and we ensure that their compensation is paid rapidly and not delayed, as it has been in all those other cases? In the case of freeholders who are still holding out and not paying for the remedial work to their properties, it is about time they paid fines for delaying that work.

The inquiry report is damning, and the testimony that we heard is utterly devastating. First and foremost, all our thoughts are with the victims, the survivors, the bereaved and everybody affected. In the last Parliament, many of us fought tooth and nail on a cross-party basis to improve the Fire Safety Bill and the Building Safety Bill so that social tenants and leaseholders who are still living in buildings covered in cladding and with other fire safety defects could get that remediation work done as quickly as possible. It is now clear that in some cases, the waterfall system that has been set up, by which we identify who is responsible, is simply not working and is taking far too long. One idea that was on the table in the last Parliament was that in some cases, the Government could put the money up to pay for the remediation, to take away the risk, and then use the power of the state and its lawyers to go after those responsible with penalties, so that the taxpayer would not lose out. Will the Prime Minister, who says that this is a moment of change and has committed to speed things up, please review that idea to see whether it could be used in some limited cases where there has still been no action?

I thank the Prime Minister for his statement today. I recently visited the Grenfell site with Lord Boateng, who is in the Gallery today—

I thank the Prime Minister for his statement today. The Grenfell fire was an unimaginable tragedy but, as he rightly said, it was also a comprehensive failure by the British state, and in many respects that comprehensive failure persists today. I am grateful for the words that he said about giving all resource and support to the police and the Crown Prosecution Service, because clearly the victims, the survivors and the community of North Kensington want the insights and the answers that they have partly had today, but they also want justice, and that needs to be delivered as soon as possible. Equally, I fully support the effort that the Prime Minister is going to make to see if further regulatory changes are required. They need to be made in a proportionate and effective way, and there are lessons to be learned from changes that we have made in the recent past. But when making those changes, can I urge him to look in particular at the status of the testing facility—the Building Research Establishment—and at the way it operates, which I think has failed significantly, as is laid out in the report? Finally, I concur with the broader point that the Prime Minister made today, which is that when one speaks to the victims and their families, one is left with a very strong sense that many people in social housing in our country feel that they are second-class citizens and that they are being treated with disrespect. That must end. Will he take forward the work that began with the social housing White Paper to ensure that that never happens again?

Following the wildfires of 2022 in Dagenham and Rainham, the ongoing crisis at Launders Lane in Rainham and now the devastating fire at the Spectrum building, also in my constituency, will the Prime Minister join me in commending the outstanding work of our emergency services? Will he also comment on the Government’s plans to improve fire resilience and safety in residential buildings and to hold those who are responsible to account when tragedies like this happen?

I thank the Prime Minister and Sir Martin for their comprehensive report. The needless deaths at Grenfell highlight a contract culture, deregulation, privatisation, ignorance, and contempt by those who should have protected residents. I urge criminal action against negligent parties and ask if dangerous cladding will be removed from private sector leasehold buildings.

On Chelsea council estates, there are discussions about Grenfell's incompetence and indifference from the local council. I ask if the Prime Minister will commit to working with local authorities to implement the report and ensure disabled residents have proper evacuation plans.

The pace of change has been frustrating, even years after the fire. I suggest establishing a Sub-Committee or cross-party Committee to monitor progress and provide external scrutiny on the report’s recommendations.

Reinforcing the Prime Minister’s statement on consistent and measured view, I ask if powers can be taken to control buildings with non-compliant owners living in tax havens and recover costs by acquiring and selling such buildings.

I thank the Prime Minister for his statement and ask if access to fire risk assessments can be improved, particularly for social housing tenants and leaseholders.

I welcome the Prime Minister's statement and ask for clear deadlines on removing flammable or unsafe cladding from high-rise blocks.

Colleagues have raised the issue of the urgent need for justice and prosecutions to be brought. Will he ensure that there is adequate resource in the policing arena and capacity in the court system to bring cases speedily?

Does the Prime Minister agree that deregulation and corporate greed were reasons for the Grenfell Tower catastrophe? When will the Government set up a statutory advisory body on fire policy?

Will he join me in paying tribute again to volunteer organisations, including Grenfell United, and members of charities and churches working tirelessly in the aftermath?

How will the Prime Minister support leaseholders living in 3,000 medium and high-rise buildings still being monitored by the Government because they are clad in unsafe cladding?

Will the Prime Minister look carefully at building control inspection since deregulation, which is often not carried out in person but through phone calls and photographs?

How will the Prime Minister ensure that those responsible for the broader building safety crisis should pay to make buildings safe at pace?

Will the findings and recommendations of the report be conveyed to the Minister at the Northern Ireland Assembly with urgency?

Will he reassure me that the Government will work closely with local authorities to ensure they have support for additional regulatory burdens?

Can he ensure that residents, tenants, and professional firefighters are heard and listened to?

How long will it take for UK building regulations to catch up, particularly on thermal insulation and fire safety risks?

Asked if the new Government would undertake work without delay to separate government from corporate lobbying, tackle social and racial injustices, and bring systemic change as urged by Grenfell United.

Highlighted the similarities between the Grenfell fire and a 1999 fire in Irvine, Scotland, urging the government to look at lessons from the Garnock Court fire.

Expressed difficulty in containing anger upon reading the report, emphasising the urgent action needed. Asked about a definitive report for each constituency on actions taken and to be taken, as well as requested an urgent review of building regulations considering vulnerable residents.