← Back to House of Commons Debates
Global Combat Air Programme 2025-01-20
20 January 2025
Lead MP
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
DefenceEmployment
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi raised concerns about global combat air programme 2025-01-20 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The UK is a world leader in combat air, having developed iconic fighter jets like the Spitfire and Typhoon. GCAP, an international collaboration with Japan and Italy aimed at delivering a next-generation fighter aircraft by 2035, promises national sovereignty in combat air, strengthened relationships with allies, and boosted defence industrial capacity. However, delivering on this ambitious programme will be challenging and requires transparency about costs, learning from past mistakes, flexibility to adapt to emerging technologies, and addressing workforce challenges.
James Cartlidge
Con
South Suffolk
Supports GCAP for continuing the UK's tradition in combat air and emphasises the importance of financial transparency to ensure adequate funding for both the Tempest platform and associated technologies. He stresses that these advancements could enhance the RAF's lethality before 2035.
Derek Twigg
Lab
Widnes and Halewood
Acknowledges the tremendous enthusiasm from GCAP partners in Japan and Italy, highlighting the project's importance for their defence industrial base. Emphasises that if the UK does not commit wholeheartedly to GCAP, it will be detrimental to national interests.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Questions the presentation of GCAP and its components beyond the Tempest airframe. Expresses concern about whether the programme can meet its ambitious targets given the fast-moving technological landscape.
Calvin Bailey
Lab
Leyton and Wanstead
Highlights the need for jet training solutions following the closure of Hawk aircraft production, which has led to a missed opportunity in the global market. Urges the inclusion of jet trainers as an essential part of GCAP's training system.
Calum Miller
LD
Bicester and Woodstock
Inquires about the Committee's intention to look at agile procurement methods seen in Ukraine during this Parliament, suggesting that lessons learned could be beneficial for UK defence programmes.
Will Stone
Lab
Swindon North
Asks whether potential new partners such as Saudi Arabia might join GCAP. The Committee's report warns of the need for careful consideration to ensure that adding new partners does not jeopardise the 2035 target date.
Ian Roome
LD
North Devon
Advocates for a similar commitment from the UK Government in terms of multi-year funding plans to give confidence to industry, as seen with Japanese and Italian partners.
Graeme Downie
Lab
Dunfermline and Dollar
Asked about the export potential of Tempest and suggested the possibility of informal collaboration between consortia pursuing sixth-generation fighters for knowledge sharing.
Robin Swann
UUP
South Antrim
Inquired about the flexibility in GCAP to accommodate a range of uncrewed solutions as part of the RAF’s autonomous collaborative platform strategy.
Honiton and Sidmouth
Asked Mr Dhesi about the benefits and risks of adding Saudi Arabia to the programme, highlighting previous overestimations in export potential from multilateral fighter jet programmes.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Discussed the importance of skilled workers in Northern Ireland for transferring GCAP skills through both smaller and larger operations and contracts.
Shadow Response
James Cartlidge
Shadow Response
The Opposition strongly supports GCAP for continuing the UK's tradition in combat air. Emphasises the need for financial transparency to ensure adequate funding for both the Tempest platform and associated technologies that could enhance the RAF's lethality before 2035.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.