← Back to House of Commons Debates

Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting) 2026-01-29

29 January 2026

Lead MP

Dan Tomlinson

Debate Type

General Debate

Tags

Taxation
Other Contributors: 23

At a Glance

Dan Tomlinson raised concerns about finance (no. 2) bill (third sitting) 2026-01-29 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
The Government is introducing a mechanism to recover winter fuel payments from pensioners with an income above £35,000. The measure aims to balance support for vulnerable pensioners while ensuring responsible use of taxpayer money. The £35,000 threshold has been set at a level that ensures more than three-quarters of pensioners will still benefit from the payment by the end of this Parliament. The Government believes changes proposed in amendments are unnecessary.

Government Response

Taxation
Government Response
Clause 55 and schedule 10 will provide a mechanism for recovering winter fuel payments from pensioners whose income exceeds £35,000. The Government believes that the proposed amendments are unnecessary at this time as more than three-quarters of pensioners will still benefit from the payment by the end of this Parliament. Defends Government’s decision to use total income as an assessment measure and argues that the £35,000 threshold is appropriate. He emphasises the importance of maintaining fairness in tax treatment while considering competitiveness and investment into the UK. Defended the measures in clause 56 and clause 57, stressing alignment between regulatory bodies and the need for robust pension scheme governance. Declined to speculate on future tax measures but committed to reviewing current reforms. I am not aware of further sectors to which the changes outlined in clause 59 would apply. I will work with officials to continue to receive representations and perspectives from those who may or may not want to see further changes. On discretion in applying penalties: yes, HMRC has discretion not to apply the penalty automatically, so it can take into account any mitigating factors. Defended the clarity and strength of existing legislation.

Shadow Response

None
Shadow Response
The clause introduces a new anti-avoidance provision aimed at arrangements involving non-derecognition liabilities. The Opposition strongly support efforts to tackle avoidance and close loopholes that undermine trust in the tax system, but want to ensure businesses have confidence and know which existing structures could be at risk. Asked for a more expansive definition in Committee, questioning the adequacy of current legal language.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.