← Back to House of Commons Debates

UK-China Economic and Financial Dialogue 2025-01-14

14 January 2025

Lead MP

Rachel Reeves

Debate Type

General Debate

Tags

Economy
Other Contributors: 41

At a Glance

Rachel Reeves raised concerns about uk-china economic and financial dialogue 2025-01-14 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Growth is the No. 1 mission of this Labour Government. To help Great British businesses to export around the world, including to China, we need to engage actively with them. The Chancellor led a delegation that secured tangible benefits for British firms in China, ensuring greater market access while safeguarding national security. Agreements were made on financial services licences and quota allocations, wealth management, sustainable finance, and vaccine approvals among others, delivering significant value (£1 billion) for the UK economy.

Shadow Response

Mel Stride
Shadow Response
The shadow Chancellor criticises Labour's economic performance and the value of the Chancellor’s deal with China. He argues that the £120 million deal is insignificant compared to the £12 billion increase in debt interest due to her Budget, highlighting the lack of serious policy proposals from Labour. Stated that issues of forced labour were raised with Chinese counterparts. Emphasised stringent requirements for companies seeking to list in London, as set out by the United Nations and OECD on labour supply and worker treatment. Highlighted the importance of engaging China but challenging values when they do not align.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.