← Back to House of Commons Debates
Pride in Place 2025-10-15
15 October 2025
Lead MP
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyTaxation
Other Contributors: 62
At a Glance
Miatta Fahnbulleh raised concerns about pride in place 2025-10-15 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The Labour Government announced a £5 billion pride in place programme to restore pride in local communities. The programme includes two main categories of investment: a flagship programme providing up to £20 million funding per area over ten years for specific neighbourhoods; and an impact fund offering £1.5 million short-term injection for immediate results, focusing on community spaces, public spaces, and town centre revitalisation.
David Simmonds
Con
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Simmonds criticised the programme as a 'fig leaf' to cover up a collapse in local investment due to high business rates and taxes. He raised concerns about complex governance, rebadged funding from other programmes, and suggested that funding is landing more in Labour-supporting areas.
Birmingham, Hodge Hill
Defends the Government's announcement, emphasises putting communities in charge, rejects accusations of process tying and fiddling with methodology, highlights a 10-year funding commitment starting immediately for phase one places.
Navendu Mishra
Lab
Stockport
Welcomes the investment for Stockport but criticises the previous Government's 'levelling-up' slogan as hollow and lacking substance.
Gideon Amos
LD
Taunton and Wellington
Welcomes the commitment to invest in high streets and communities but questions the strategy for creating a patchwork of small ringfenced grants, acknowledges the sell-off of community assets due to funding crises and asks about plans to relieve the care funding crisis.
Paula Barker
Lab
Liverpool Wavertree
Welcomes the £22 million investment in Fairfield but questions if the money should be used for core council services.
Andrew Mitchell
Con
Sutton Coldfield
Congratulates the Minister and welcomes the initiative, noting its continuity with previous Government efforts. Invites her to visit Sutton Coldfield to see how funds will be utilized effectively.
Nottingham North
Welcomed the £20 million pride in place funding for communities, emphasising that decisions will be made by neighbourhood boards with community support and investment plans.
Gosport
Expressed concerns about potential misuse of funds by local councils. Asked the Minister to introduce protections to prevent unscrupulous councils from misusing the funding.
Reaffirmed that communities and neighbourhood boards will be in control, with MPs having a say on who chairs these boards to ensure local voices are heard.
Gerald Jones
Lab
Merthyr Tydfil and Aberdare
Welcomed the investment but emphasised the need for real engagement with communities. Asked about discussions regarding a replacement for the shared prosperity fund.
Announced details of a local growth fund geared towards areas needing support, such as mayoral authorities in the north and midlands.
David Mundell
Con
Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale
Asked about reasons for slow disbursement of Borderlands funding and requested a full investigation into the issue.
Agreed to investigate why funds are being blocked and expressed readiness to unblock investment at pace.
Justin Madders
Lab
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Welcomed the Minister's appointment and praised the community-driven approach, contrasting it with the previous regime. Asked for assurances that community voices will be heard.
Emphasised that communities are in control, with designed programmes to ensure genuine community input and shape regeneration plans.
Torbay
Welcomed the principle of empowering communities but raised concerns about social housing scarcity. Asked for government reflection on addressing this issue.
Acknowledged the critical housing issue and highlighted record investment by the Government in affordable housing.
Natasha Irons
Lab
Croydon East
Welcomed £20 million investment for New Addington, emphasising community decision-making. Asked about new powers given to local communities.
Reaffirmed the critical role of neighbourhood boards and community right to buy to ensure community-driven regeneration.
Andrew Murrison
Con
South West Wiltshire
Asked about ensuring effective use of funds without legal challenges. Raised concerns about decision-making by unelected boards.
Emphasised the intent to repurpose premises effectively and the community-driven approach, along with capacity-building support for successful investment.
Shaun Davies
Lab
Telford
Welcomed £20 million match-funded by Labour-led Telford and Wrekin council. Asked when funds will reach communities and challenged other government agencies to align with community empowerment ethos.
Ben Maguire
LD
North Cornwall
Cornwall's lack of funding for deprived towns despite the end of shared prosperity funding is concerning. He requests a meeting with Fin Irwin to discuss plans for Bodmin’s Fore Street.
Lauren Sullivan
Lab
Gravesham
Welcomes Gravesham's £1.5 million investment over two years as a great opportunity to build communities and improve local economies.
Nick Timothy
Con
West Suffolk
Welcomed Lakenheath’s inclusion in the announcement and requested a meeting to discuss integrating new housing with transport connections from Cambridge to Haverhill.
Julie Minns
Lab
Carlisle
Commends Carlisle's £20 million investment but criticises centralised decision-making and praises community-led initiatives as transformative.
Pete Wishart
SNP
Perth and Kinross-shire
Complained about Perth and Kinross being ignored, receiving no funding despite securing £5 million from the Conservatives previously.
Paul Waugh
Lab/Co-op
Rochdale
Welcomed Rochdale's overdue investment of £20 million in Smallbridge and Hurstead, citing years of neglect by the Conservative party and Whitehall.
Gregory Stafford
Con
Farnham and Bordon
Asked why his constituency did not receive funding despite having places needing investment. Invited the Minister to visit his constituency.
Rosie Wrighting
Lab
Kettering
Highlighted the negative legacy of Tory policies in Avondale Grange and praised the £20 million investment for fostering community pride and unity.
Twickenham
Expressed concerns about London local authorities losing core Government funding under the fairer funding review, seeking an impact assessment and transitional funding.
Antonia Bance
Lab
Tipton and Wednesbury
Highlighted the lack of facilities for young people in Friar Park and welcomed the £20 million investment as a massive difference.
Ashley Fox
Con
Bridgwater
Welcomed additional funding but asked about further rounds of allocation, interested in leveraging additional funding through social impact investors and philanthropists.
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
The Minister emphasised the Government's commitment to grassroots growth, community wealth building, and putting communities at the heart of driving change. She highlighted the use of deprivation and community needs index metrics to focus the programme on areas in most need, while acknowledging that this is part of a larger strategy involving regional mayors and local government investment.
Llinos Medi
PC
Ynys Môn
The MP questioned why rural communities are excluded by design from the programme despite the use of deprivation metrics, citing an example where only one town on Ynys Môn meets the population threshold.
Derby North
The MP expressed support for the long-term investment and emphasised that local people should have a say in how the money is spent, particularly referencing Chaddesden in Derby which has been neglected for 14 years.
Sorcha Eastwood
Alliance
Lagan Valley
The MP raised concerns about the Northern Ireland Executive and the lack of replacement for the shared prosperity fund, questioning the impact on local growth investment in Northern Ireland. She asked if discussions have been held with the Northern Ireland Office.
Chris Webb
Lab
Blackpool South
The MP highlighted Blackpool's deprived status as a result of Tory policies and requested details on how the £1.5 million can be used quickly to restore high streets, while inviting the Minister to visit Blackpool.
Lisa Smart
LD
Hazel Grove
The MP welcomed the funding going into neighbouring areas but expressed concerns about the timeframe for social care review and questioned what conversations are being had with the Department of Health and Social Care.
Lizzi Collinge
Lab
Morecambe and Lunesdale
The MP welcomed the £20 million funding going into Morecambe, stating that it shows Labour's trust in local people to spend money locally without bureaucratic hurdles. She asked for a speedy implementation of the programme.
Ayoub Khan
Ind
Birmingham Perry Barr
The MP welcomed the funding package but pointed out that some deprived neighbourhoods in Birmingham have not received any funds and invited the Minister to meet him to discuss further funding needs.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
The MP highlighted Peterlee’s Labour Government investment of £20 million, noting it is important that this programme gives new powers to local people to decide how the money is spent.
Birmingham Erdington
The MP welcomed Kingstanding's £20 million investment and asked for assurances that local residents will come first after 14 years of Conservative neglect.
Andrew Pakes
Lab
Peterborough
The MP warmly welcomed the funding coming to Peterborough, emphasising the importance of not just bricks and mortar but changing lives through facilities such as family hubs. He highlighted the role of cooperative development in this strategy.
Wolverhampton North East
Welcomes the £20 million for Low Hill and an additional £1.5 million of pride in place impact funding, stressing that communities must be at the heart of deciding how to spend the money.
Mark Sewards
Lab
Leeds South West and Morley
Welcomes the £20 million for Old Farnley but calls for empowerment and faster action from residents to deliver change with the funding.
Tom Collins
Lab
Worcester
Emphasises that Warndon in Worcester needs respect, empowerment, and community-driven decisions to utilise the £20 million commitment effectively over 10 years.
Amanda Martin
Lab
Portsmouth North
Highlights the transformative potential of £41.5 million for Portsmouth under Labour’s pride in place impact programmes, with specific focus on Paulsgrove and community-led initiatives.
Barrow and Furness
Welcomes the funding allocation to Barrow Central ward, one of the most deprived areas, stressing that residents know where money should be spent for positive change.
Alice Macdonald
Lab/Co-op
Norwich North
Calls for involvement from all ages and backgrounds in Heartsease and Pilling Park to ensure the funding transforms their communities positively.
Lorraine Beavers
Lab
Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Asks for early opportunities and resources for Fleetwood, a community ready to deliver transformative changes with urgency.
Elsie Blundell
Lab
Heywood and Middleton North
Stresses the need for priority in local authority areas where acute need is evident, like Middleton, after years of Tory neglect.
Jonathan Brash
Lab
Hartlepool
Welcomes £21.5 million investment for Hartlepool, highlighting it as a sign that the people of Hartlepool have a Government and MP on their side after years of being left behind.
Kevin McKenna
Lab
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Highlights the need for local community involvement in East Sheppey projects, ensuring the funding is a catalyst for further change and investment.
Terry Jermy
Lab
South West Norfolk
Welcomes the funding for Thetford to increase capacity and reopen medieval church as a community space, which will support local businesses and economy.
Dan Aldridge
Lab
Weston-super-Mare
The Bournville, Coronation and Oldmixon communities have survived despite previous Westminster neglect. The £20 million investment in Weston-super-Mare is an endorsement of community champions who kept vulnerable communities together.
Darren Paffey
Lab
Southampton Itchen
Welcomes Labour Government's £20 million and £1.5 million investments into Weston and Southampton Itchen constituency, emphasising long-term stable and community-led investment as transformative for communities.
Luke Myer
Lab
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Confirms Park End and Beckfield will benefit from £20 million Pride in Place scheme. Proposes funding should be spent by the community on their priorities, not politicians or councils.
Helena Dollimore
Lab/Co-op
Hastings and Rye
Welcomes extra funding for Hastings but criticises previous schemes under Conservatives. Questions Parchment Trust’s plans to sell the Bridge community centre in Ore on the open market, suggesting they should consider returning it to public hands.
Richard Baker
Lab
Glenrothes and Mid Fife
Welcomes £40 million Pride in Place funding for neighbourhoods in Fife. Asks how funds can support local decision-making in Scottish communities under the SNP government, particularly those in areas of deprivation.
Penrith and Solway
Thanks Minister for £20 million investment announcement. Criticises lack of transparency in levelling-up money allocation under the previous government, asks for assurance on transparency from this Labour Government.
Richard Burgon
Lab
Leeds East
Welcomes £20 million secured for Seacroft North and Monkswood. Proposes ideas and answers on how to spend money lie with local people in those communities, not politicians or the previous Tory government.
Government Response
The Government announced a £5 billion pride in place programme aimed at restoring local pride through investment in community projects. It includes two main categories: a flagship programme providing up to £20 million funding per area over ten years and an impact fund offering £1.5 million short-term injection for immediate results, focusing on community spaces, public spaces, and town centre revitalisation. Defends the programme's approach of empowering communities and local authorities through multi-year funding and consolidation of grants. Highlights a commitment to devolution over 10 years and acknowledges the asset sell-off as a legacy issue from previous governments. Emphasised the importance of communities being in control, with clear intent for capacity-building support and enabling environment to ensure successful investment. Emphasised the focus on areas with high deprivation and community needs index. Committed to meeting MPs for further discussions about their constituencies. Discussed plans for leveraging additional funding through social impact investors, philanthropists, and local businesses. The Minister reiterated the Government's commitment to grassroots growth, community wealth building, and ensuring that communities are at the heart of driving change. She detailed how deprivation metrics were used to focus the programme on areas in most need but acknowledged the broader strategy involving regional mayors and local government investment. Emphasises that communities should be in charge of decisions regarding investments; underscores the importance of empowering residents to drive change. Reiterates commitment to rapid action and community involvement. Communities should be at the heart of decision-making for Pride in Place funding. The £20 million investment is a game-changer and communities are in the driving seat to spend it on their priorities, not politicians or councils.
Shadow Response
David Simmonds
Shadow Response
Simmonds criticised the programme as a 'fig leaf' to cover up a collapse in local investment due to high business rates and taxes. He raised concerns about complex governance, rebadged funding from other programmes, and suggested that funding is landing more in Labour-supporting areas.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.