Defended current provisions, stating that amendments were unnecessary as existing accountability procedures are robust. Emphasised that GBR will be held accountable and a representative on GBR’s board would have responsibility for freight. Minister clarified that clause 18(1) sets out clearly who and what duties apply to, making the amendment unnecessary. He stated that these functions and duties set out GBR's purpose. Defends clause 18(2)(a), arguing it already mandates promoting the interests of passengers and potential users, including disabled persons. Indicates this satisfies the duty to promote passenger growth. Mather defends the Government's position, emphasising that the Bill already includes provisions to address passenger interests, economic growth, and efficiency. He argues against duplicative duties proposed by amendments. The Government claim that they want ORR to monitor GBR, but several key parts of GBR’s operation are exempted from the competition duty. This makes GBR all-powerful over other operators and does not promote fair competition. We have put forward amendment 210 which suggests a different way of promoting competition: centrally decided timetables and auctioned train paths. Argues that removing ORR's exemptions in clause 20 would undermine economic considerations and potentially harm passenger rights, advocating for a more balanced approach. Minister Keir Mather confirmed ongoing negotiations for MOUs with Welsh and Scottish Governments, aiming to publish them as soon as possible. He clarified that clause 23 already mandates publication while maintaining flexibility in timelines. The Minister urged the shadow minister to withdraw amendment 39 due to its potential counterproductive impact.