← Back to House of Commons Debates
Political Finance Rules 2025-03-06
06 March 2025
Lead MP
Lloyd Hatton
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyNorthern IrelandDemocracy & Elections
Other Contributors: 15
At a Glance
Lloyd Hatton raised concerns about political finance rules 2025-03-06 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Calls for tightening political donation laws due to concerns over foreign and corrupt funding, risks to national security, and the need to strengthen regulators' powers. Highlights that £115 million of donations came from unknown or questionable sources between 2021-2024, exposing weaknesses in current regulations allowing shell companies to funnel money into UK politics.
Ellie Chowns
Green
North Herefordshire
Supports strengthening political finance rules to protect democracy from foreign influence. Questions the lack of individual donation limits and enforcement powers, citing £115 million in donations from unknown sources over a decade as evidence of serious issues.
Chris Hinchliff
Lab
North East Hertfordshire
Calls for immediate action to address corrupt funding in political parties and the need for greater transparency. Emphasises the importance of restoring the Electoral Commission's independence and proposes measures such as lowering reporting thresholds, capping donations, and tightening regulations on shell companies.
Iqbal Mohamed
Ind
Dewsbury and Batley
Highlights lack of transparency in political party funding, citing Transparency International research which shows £42 million from corrupt sources since 2001. Criticises defence industry corruption and proposes reforms to tighten spending rules, lower limits on donations, introduce caps, and enhance the Electoral Commission’s powers.
Tom Hayes
Lab
Bournemouth East
Supports tighter regulations on political finance, including donation caps of £10,000 a year for individuals and organisations. Emphasises the need to close loopholes allowing foreign funding and ensure only trusted sources fund overseas trips.
Poole
Raises concerns about economic dominance leading to political influence, citing Transparency International data on corrupt donors since 2001. Proposes an independent Ethics and Integrity Commission and closing loopholes for unincorporated associations and overseas funding.
Paul Kohler
LD
Wimbledon
Stresses the importance of rebuilding trust in politics, noting a significant drop in public trust over the past decade. Calls for MPs to focus on addressing people's concerns rather than internal party issues.
Stella Creasy
Lab/Co-op
Walthamstow
Highlights national security concerns with potential large donations from foreign entities. Emphasises the impact of money on local democracy, citing issues like disinformation and fake leaflets in constituencies.
Joe Powell
Lab
Kensington and Bayswater
Supports strengthening donation rules and transparency measures, including reforms to clamp down on unincorporated associations. Advocates for a cap on political donations due to the increasing reliance on major donors.
Phil Brickell
Lab
Bolton West
Low voter turnout and ease of circumventing donation restrictions pose significant risks. Foreign donations must be banned more effectively, as seen in past instances where the Bureau of Investigative Journalism made impermissible donations to major parties. Russian entities have donated large sums to political campaigns, raising concerns about influence buying. KYD rules should be introduced, shell company loopholes closed, and unincorporated associations regulated.
Sarah Olney
LD
Richmond Park
The Liberal Democrats support reforms to prevent foreign interference and increase transparency in political donations by strengthening the Electoral Commission’s independence and enforcement powers. They advocate for capping donations to political parties, enhancing regulatory power, and reversing Conservative Government changes that weakened the commission's independence.
David Simmonds
Con
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Stressed the importance of transparency in political donations through The Guardian's article detailing party spending limits and efforts. Raised concerns over issue-based campaign funding practices from the US, which can significantly impact British elections without being classified as direct donations to parties. Mentioned recent changes by Labour in Wales and SNP in Scotland that allow foreign citizens to vote and donate, creating a loophole. Questioned why the Government abandoned commitments under the National Security Act 2023 for sharing information between regulators, law enforcement, and political parties.
Rushanara Ali
Lab
Bethnal Green and Bow
The defending democracy taskforce, chaired by the Home Secretary alongside the Deputy Prime Minister, is looking at issues related to social media and political parties. The Government are reviewing changes in the role of the regulator to ensure enforcement provides a clear deterrent against breaking laws while remaining proportionate. They are considering evidence from various stakeholders and will continue efforts on election security and preparedness.
Ben Lake
PC
Ceredigion Preseli
He is pleased that the Government recognise the evolving nature of threats, especially in cyber and social media platforms. He hopes they look at ways social media can be used to benefit political parties directly or indirectly.
Andrew Lewin
Lab
Welwyn Hatfield
He discussed Elon Musk's comments during riots and suggested investigating such individuals who interfere with democracy, emphasising that their money has no place in politics. He supports protecting the integrity of elections and preventing foreign interference.
He thanked Members for contributions to the debate on political donations and regulation, highlighting the need for change to protect democracy from dirty money and Russian oligarchs. He reminded hon. Member for Dewsbury and Batley about the importance of evidence-based arguments.
Government Response
The Government are reviewing whether changes in the role of the regulator are needed to ensure enforcement is proportionate while providing a deterrent against breaking laws. They consider recommendations from various stakeholders, including the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, the Committee on Standards in Public Life and the Electoral Commission. The work focuses on protecting democracy's integrity.
Shadow Response
None
Shadow Response
Acknowledged the debate's importance in protecting democracy from foreign interference. Emphasised the UK’s strong political finance framework, which prohibits foreign donations with exceptions for certain Irish sources to Northern Ireland parties. Noted plans to strengthen safeguards against foreign donations, including enhanced checks on recipients and donors. Highlighted the crucial role of the Electoral Commission in regulating political finance.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.