← Back to House of Commons Debates
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) 2025-03-25
25 March 2025
Lead MP
Jim McMahon
Wigan
Lab
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
EconomyTaxation
Other Contributors: 12
At a Glance
Jim McMahon raised concerns about non-domestic rating (multipliers and private schools) bill (changed to non-domestic rating (multipliers) bill) 2025-03-25 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Response
The Minister provided detailed explanations for why the Government opposes certain Lords amendments. He highlighted the fiscal sustainability of the proposed higher multipliers and defended the targeted nature of support measures aimed at retail, hospitality, leisure properties and anchor stores. The Minister also emphasised that a sustainable business rates system is crucial for supporting growth and ensuring businesses pay their fair share. Defended the Government’s stance on the Bill by emphasising its targeted approach to those who need support and being fully funded. Rejected Lords amendments due to potential financial unsustainability or conflicts with manifesto commitments.
Jim McMahon
Lab
Wigan
The Minister for Local Government and English Devolution opened the debate by expressing gratitude to Members of both Houses for their scrutiny of the Bill. He explained that the Bill is a crucial step towards transforming the business rates system into one that supports growth, sustainability, and fairness. The Minister emphasised the need for a permanent tax cut that is sustainably funded through higher multipliers applied to properties with rateable values at or above £500,000.
Kevin Hollinrake
Con
Thirsk and Malton
Mr. Hollinrake questioned whether the proposed reforms were permanent or just a first step. He sought clarity on the Government's commitment to providing long-term certainty for businesses.
Suella Braverman
Con
Fareham and Waterlooville
Ms Braverman inquired about the impact of the Bill on pubs, highlighting that many have been struggling due to rising costs. The Minister responded by stressing the long-term support for such businesses through the measures proposed.
Chris Vince
Lab/Co-op
Harlow
Mr. Vince questioned whether focusing on exemptions from business rates was an appropriate approach to supporting the manufacturing industry, suggesting that other means might be more effective.
Suella Braverman
Con
Defended the Government's stance on the Bill, emphasising that it targets those who need support and is fully funded. Rejected Lords amendments due to potential financial unsustainability or conflicts with manifesto commitments.
Kevin Hollinrake
Con
Thirsk and Malton
Critiqued the Government's business rate changes, citing economic hardship for small businesses and decreased confidence in the economy. Supported amendments that would review rates for fulfillment warehouses and support manufacturing sectors. Highlighted Labour's broken promises on business rates reform.
Mark Sewards
Lab
Leeds South West and Morley
The Bill is necessary to support our high streets. It strikes a fairer balance between small businesses and large, and I am pleased to have contributed during most stages of its progress. Amendments 2, 5, 8 and 11 seek to exempt anchor stores from the higher multipliers, thus reducing the revenue raised by the Bill overall. By reducing that revenue, the amendments reduce the support available to smaller retail, hospitality and leisure businesses, when providing that support is the entire purpose of this legislation.
Asked what would be said to businesses trying to make their numbers add up. Inquired about the Labour party's promise during previous elections to level the playing field between online giants and small businesses, but pointed out that many different premises are being hit by these increases.
Mark Sewards
Lab
Leeds South West and Morley
The Bill is designed specifically to revive our high streets. The hon. Gentleman will remember, because his party was in government at the time, that our high streets were struggling and suffocating, and it is incumbent on this new Government to revive them. That is why it is so important for us to pass the Bill today.
Twickenham
Begins by thanking noble Lords in the other place for their work on the Bill. Expresses concern about pubs, restaurants and cafés who are wondering how they will continue with the reduction in rates relief. Tables amendments to improve the Bill and ensure it gives consideration to manufacturing facilities.
Mark Sewards
Con
Leeds South West
The electoral system mandates that the party with a majority delivers their manifesto pledges, even if they did not receive significant support. The Government is implementing policies such as employers’ national insurance contributions and winter fuel allowance cuts which were not in their manifesto.
Suella Braverman
Con
Hampshire
The amendment will harm children attending both private and state schools, pushing hundreds or thousands of pupils into already full state schools. This measure is unforgivable as it undermines the education quality for all children.
Shadow Response
None
Shadow Response
Critiqued the Government's business rate changes, citing economic hardship for small businesses and decreased confidence in the economy. Supported amendments that would review rates for fulfillment warehouses and support manufacturing sectors. Highlighted Labour's broken promises on business rates reform.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.