← Back to House of Commons Debates
UK Air Defence 2025-01-16
16 January 2025
Lead MP
Andrew Murrison
Debate Type
Adjournment Debate
Tags
UkraineDefence
Other Contributors: 3
At a Glance
Andrew Murrison raised concerns about uk air defence 2025-01-16 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Among the many issues that should be keeping Ministers awake at night are two tech-based conundrums: access to critical minerals and protection against missiles and drones. Defence costs are increasing, and the UK is not globally deployable or focusing on homeland defence. The US may demand higher NATO spending from European nations. Russia poses a proximate threat with its military capabilities, and the UK's current missile defence systems are inadequate. Germany has initiated the European Sky Shield initiative to address these threats. The UK should consider joining initiatives like ESSI for better protection. Historical examples of shadow factories highlight the importance of preparing for war through industrial capacity. The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory’s Missile Defence Centre is crucial but needs assessment and potential upgrading. NATO integrated air and missile defence with close-in systems is vital, especially as the US pivots towards the Indo-Pacific.
John Cooper
Con
Dumfries and Galloway
Questions the reliance on domestic systems and suggests considering off-the-shelf systems from other countries.
David Reed
Con
Exmouth and Exeter East
Does he think our allies are confident that we are playing our part in air defence?
Cameron Thomas
Lib Dem
Tewkesbury
Do the Government view the defence of UK airspace not singularly but as the western front of European air defence?
Government Response
The Minister thanked Dr Murrison for his serious approach to the debate and acknowledged the difficulty in times of increased threats. He stated that Lord Robertson is conducting a strategic defence review to address these challenges. The Minister highlighted the importance of integrated air missile defence, drones, and command of the electromagnetic spectrum, acknowledging the need for difficult decisions such as retiring old platforms like Watchkeeper due to technological obsolescence. He also mentioned his recent participation in an E5 Defence Ministers meeting in Warsaw, noting that NATO allies are taking air and missile defence seriously. The UK is increasing its defence spending from 2.3% to 2.5%, focusing on interoperability with allies to deter aggression. Luke Pollard emphasised the need for a reimagined strategy due to changes in threat definitions since the Ukraine war, addressing questions about NATO's eastern and southern flanks. He reiterated that adversaries must know the UK possesses formidable capabilities contributing to integrated air and missile defence. The Minister acknowledges the right hon. Member's concerns and highlights that enhancing capabilities is a core challenge of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR). The SDR will address how to match threats with appropriate defence measures, aiming to reach the 2.5% GDP target for defence spending in spring. Our NATO-first approach ensures protection under Article 3 and support under Article 5. Initiatives such as DIAMOND aim to improve air defence integration across Europe, while agreements like the Trinity House agreement between UK and Germany will strengthen air defences and better protect European airspace. The Minister also mentions closer cooperation with France through initiatives such as ELSA, aimed at supporting Ukraine and countering threats posed by Putin. A letter will be sent to address any points not covered during the debate.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.