Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Call for Evidence: Part K, Building Safety Regulation (Protection from Falling, Collision and Impact)

16 October 2026 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Florence Eshalomi Labour (Co-op) City of London

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Florence Eshalomi raised concerns about call for evidence: part k, building safety regulation (protection from falling, collision and impact) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Florence Eshalomi highlighted the upcoming call for evidence by the Building Safety Regulator on Part K of the Building Regulations.
  • The call for evidence aims to gather views on gaps, issues, and potential improvements in the regulation and guidance related to falls, collisions, impacts, and safety features in buildings.
  • No specific asks of the government or commitments made by the government were recorded.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Florence Eshalomi Labour (Co-op) City of London

Florence Eshalomi highlighted the upcoming call for evidence by the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) on Part K of the Building Regulations and Approved Document K. She emphasised the BSR's role in reviewing the safety of people in buildings and the standard of buildings. The call for evidence aims to gather views on gaps, issues, and potential improvements in the regulation and guidance related to falls, collisions, impacts, and safety features in buildings.

Other contributors (1)
  • Florence Eshalomi Lab City of London

    Florence Eshalomi encouraged all interested parties to respond to the call for evidence from the BSR on Part K and its associated guidance. The evidence will inform future considerations of Part K and Approved Document K, potentially leading to further justified changes.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy