← Back to House of Commons Debates
Robert Hamill Inquiry Report
14 September 2026
Lead MP
Chris Bryant
Debate Type
Ministerial Statement
Tags
Northern Ireland
Other Contributors: 15
At a Glance
Chris Bryant raised concerns about robert hamill inquiry report in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Government Statement
Chris Bryant paid tribute to Robert Hamill's family for their grace and honour in the 29 years since his murder. He stated that Robert Hamill was murdered on 27 April 1997, after being violently assaulted and left with fatal injuries. The inquiry report, published after 15 years of delay, found that the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) officers were not responsible for facilitating Hamill's death, but there were significant omissions in the investigation. The report also found that former RUC officer Robert Atkinson was guilty of obstructing justice. Bryant expressed regret for the delays and acknowledged the impact on the Hamill family. He noted the importance of the Belfast/Good Friday agreement and the need for continued efforts towards peace and harmony in Northern Ireland.
Question
Does the Secretary of State agree that the vast majority of RUC officers served with exemplary skill and bravery and deserve our thanks?
Minister reply
The minister acknowledged the bravery and skill of the vast majority of RUC officers and expressed gratitude for their service.
Question
Does the Secretary of State accept that the central finding of the report—that no officer in the Land Rover acted wrongfully—is a majority finding from which the inquiry’s own chairman dissented?
Minister reply
The minister acknowledged the dissenting view of the former chair, Sir Edwin Jowitt, and stated that the report was a majority finding.
Question
How have the Hamill family been supported throughout the process of publication?
Minister reply
The minister did not provide a specific answer but acknowledged the ongoing support for the Hamill family.
Question
What is the Government’s assessment of the costs, what they have delivered, and what they tell us about the inquiry model as a route to legacy truth recovery?
Minister reply
The minister did not provide a specific assessment but acknowledged the costs and delays, noting that the inquiry had cost £33 million by 2011 and took an additional 15 years to publish.
Question
How will the material gathered by the inquiry be preserved and made available to the body handling legacy cases and the Public Record Office in Northern Ireland?
Minister reply
The minister did not provide a specific answer but acknowledged the importance of preserving the material.
Question
Do the Government consider the questions raised by the report to be closed by its publication or do they accept that there is unfinished business in relation to the Director of Public Prosecutions’ role?
Minister reply
The minister did not provide a specific answer but acknowledged the ongoing need for justice.
Charlie Dewhirst
SDLP
Belfast North
Question
I thank the Secretary of State for his statement, and I echo his opening remarks. I pass on my own condolences to the Prime Minister and my deepest sympathies to the Hamill family on this most challenging of days. The killing of Robert Hamill was a tragedy, and the Opposition condemn all heinous sectarian violence. Robert Hamill was beaten to death in his own town. His death should never have happened, and his killers should be brought to justice. His family have been waiting 29 years, and Sir Edwin Jowitt did not live to see his own report published. This inquiry took too long. The failings of the police were because of a lack of due diligence; there was no overarching conspiracy in the events that led up to his death. The report highlights police failures of investigation, which were entirely wrong. The case of Atkinson led to a conviction for perverting the course of justice, and we condemn those actions entirely. We believe that 12 months served is not enough for such a crime. Those in the RUC who shamed themselves dishonour the many thousands of officers who served with integrity, standing between bombs, bullets and civilians. It is clear that the inquiry found that this was a case of negligence and that there was no overall conspiracy in the RUC to prevent a proper investigation. Those who murdered Robert Hamill could still be walking the streets today; we find it deplorable that they have not been brought to justice. May I take the opportunity to thank all those who have been involved in the report? I would like to ask the Secretary of State a number of questions. First, thousands of people served in the RUC in one of the most difficult policing environments imaginable. Does he agree that the vast majority of them carried out their duties with exemplary skill and bravery and deserve our thanks? Secondly, does he accept that the central finding of the report—that no officer in the Land Rover acted wrongfully—is a majority finding from which the inquiry’s own chairman dissented? Further, how have the Hamill family been supported throughout the process of publication? This is one of the last of the core inquiries to report. What is the Government’s assessment of what those inquiries have collectively cost, what they have delivered and what they tell us about the inquiry model as a route to legacy truth recovery? The inquiry had cost £33 million by the time it was initially completed in 2011, and it took a further 15 years to reach the public. What lessons do the Government draw for the Omagh bombing inquiry and the inquiry into the murder of Patrick Finucane? The Finucane inquiry is already behind schedule. How will the material gathered by the inquiry—more than 20,000 documents and evidence from 174 witnesses—be preserved? Will it be made available to the body now handling legacy cases and to the Public Record Office in Northern Ireland? Finally, do the Government consider the questions raised by the report to be closed by its publication or do they accept that there is unfinished business in relation to the Director of Public Prosecutions’ role, which the family had to go to judicial review to have considered?
Minister reply
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, whom I should welcome to his post. The first point I want to make is that something like 300 RUC officers were killed in the troubles. I pay tribute to the many thousands of RUC officers who did their jobs diligently in very difficult circumstances and with great courage and dedication to all communities in Northern Ireland. That is why a report such as this is so painful, including for the many RUC officers who formerly served, because they see the reputation of the organisation brought into disrepute by the actions of some. When we read the chapter in the report and all the paragraphs about the investigations, and the failings in them, it is difficult not to put our head in our hands and ask how on earth this could be the case. There were manifest failings. As the hon. Member said, the actions of Robert Atkinson were absolutely despicable, and he has rightly been convicted. The hon. Gentleman asked about the inquiry cost. He is right that the figure was at something like £33 million and a few more since. I feel a bit conflicted, because on the one hand, in the short time that I have been Secretary of State for Northern Ireland I have met so many people who lost loved ones and have no idea what happened, but I have also met people who see the person they believe killed their brother, their husband or their father going to Marks & Spencer or going about their daily business without ever having been interrupted by the legal system at all. They find that phenomenally painful. I also note the several points in the report where the inquiry panel points out that it would have been able to do more if more people had been able to provide witness statements, but lots of people did not do so because they felt that they were under threat or they were being cajoled into not doing so. All of that makes it very difficult to get to the truth. This is why I am committed to the troubles Bill, and to making sure that it delivers a legacy commission that is able to get to the truth for as many victims as possible. The hon. Gentleman asked about the Finucane inquiry. He will know that it is starting its processes in earnest this week. Several Governments promised an inquiry, which is why I pay tribute to my predecessor for setting it up. I hope that it will get to the answers. The hon. Gentleman’s final point was about the DPP. The report says that “we have come to the firm view that the process by which the decision was reached to discontinue the prosecution of Res Con Atkinson was riddled with significant flaws. We have reached the clear view that it was not carried out with due diligence.” In fact, subsequent to the interim report, the DPP returned to its original decision to prosecute two people, and that is what led to Mr Atkinson being convicted.
Hilary Benn
Lab
Leeds Central
Question
I begin by congratulating my right hon. Friend on his appointment as Secretary of State. This is the first chance I have had to do so, and I wish him every success for the future. This is a shocking story of a young man, Robert Hamill, who was the victim of a sectarian murder, but also the victim of the deliberate decision of a police officer to ring up a suspect a few hours after the murder to warn him to dispose of his clothing, because it might incriminate him, rather than fulfil his duty to uphold the law, and who then lied about it. Does my right hon. Friend agree that it is so important finally to tell the truth about what happened during the troubles, if reconciliation in Northern Ireland is to be progressed?
Minister reply
First, I warmly commend my right hon. Friend. If I can be as nice, sage, honourable, decent and gentlemanly as he in this role, I will have performed a decent task. He is absolutely right. There is another thing that is absolutely shocking here: there has never been an inquest. In fact, this is the first time that it has been declared that it was murder. That, of itself, is truly shocking. This is not the only case in Northern Ireland where no answers have been provided for individuals. He is absolutely right: the behaviour of Mr Atkinson would shock in a drama, but it is in fact the truth that he deliberately perverted the course of justice.
Question
Echoes the tribute to the family of Robert Hamill for their patience and grace in waiting for justice. Questions the 13-year delay in the conviction of the former RUC officer, Mr Atkinson, and asks what actions will be taken to ensure timely justice in future inquiries.
Minister reply
Acknowledges the importance of candour in public office and the need for thorough investigations. Emphasises the necessity of transparency and accountability in the PSNI and the need for a thorough review of the report.
Question
Acknowledges the brutality and sectarian nature of the murder and its impact on healing and reconciliation. Questions the implications of disclosure in the context of the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill.
Minister reply
Highlights the importance of addressing sectarianism and the need for calm and reconciliation. Confirms that the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill will address issues of disclosure.
Question
Questions the findings of the report that four RUC officers did not collude with attackers and asks for an end to the decades-long smear against the RUC.
Minister reply
Responds with a detailed explanation of the report's findings, emphasising the need to tell the whole story and defend the four officers involved.
Question
Calls for justice and truth in relation to Rosemary Nelson's case and highlights the impact of legacy issues on policing in Northern Ireland.
Minister reply
Emphasises the importance of addressing sectarianism and its impact on both murder and cover-up, and calls for moderation in dealing with past issues.
Question
Questions the value of the £33 million spent on the inquiry and asks what new information was revealed.
Minister reply
Responds by emphasising the clarity of the report in finding that a murder was committed and that there was no wrongful act or omission facilitating the murder by the police officers.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Question
I thank the Secretary of State very much for his answers. For grieving families, the absence of answers prolongs the pain and grief. There is also, of course, a wider public interest in ensuring that legacy cases, such as Robert Hamill’s, are dealt with both efficiently and fairly. But does the Secretary of State appreciate that inquiries and investigations that last for decades continue to place significant demands on police time and resources, and require large sums of public money, and that complex legacy cases can take time to investigate properly, and due process must always be respected?
Minister reply
Yes, of course I recognise that, and in addition there is the problem that for the families and for all the witnesses and the many other people, such as those who were there that night, there is the anguish of going through that process—through multiple legal processes, judicial reviews, considerations of the Director of Public Prosecutions, the original report by Justice Cory and then the eventual launching of the inquiry. All of that of course has an emotional cost as well as a financial cost. I do not want to set the financial cost aside; that is of course a consideration for Government, especially at a difficult time fiscally. But in the end we want to get as many answers as possible for people. I say this as much for the families of the 300 or so RUC officers, or the 1,100 members of the security services who were killed in Northern Ireland, and the families who were killed in whatever set of circumstances in Northern Ireland. That is why I want to make sure that the legacy commission really is able to do the job that we are setting it up to do, and that is why it is important that the troubles Bill goes through its passage. I would just say one other thing. It is one thing for us in the British Government to be candid; I think it is also important that the Irish Government be candid. That is why it is such an important part of the process that we are undergoing with the troubles Bill that when I have spoken to my opposite numbers in Dublin, Helen McEntee and Jim O’Callaghan, they have been very keen to say that they want to make sure that their necessary legislation, which enables them to participate in the process of providing answers for people and giving information, happens in lockstep with ours so that they will be implemented at the same time. If we can get the two Governments working together to provide answers, there will be many more families who will have—I hate the word “closure”, but they will at least reach a point when they are able to understand that this moment is done.
Shadow Comment
Charlie Dewhirst
Shadow Comment
Charlie Dewhirst echoed Bryant's sentiments and condemned the murder of Robert Hamill. He criticised the long delay in the inquiry's publication and highlighted the lack of a conspiracy in the RUC to prevent a proper investigation. Dewhirst expressed concern over the justice system's failure to bring the killers of Robert Hamill to justice. He asked if the Secretary of State agrees that the majority of RUC officers served with exemplary skill and bravery and deserve recognition. Dewhirst also questioned the costs and delays of similar inquiries and inquired about the preservation and future availability of the inquiry material. He concluded by condemning sectarian violence and urging for justice.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.